DON BROWN: Solar bill (SB 309) is wrong move for GOP

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 09, 2017  /   Posted in 2017 Indiana General Assembly, solar  /   No Comments

Brown

BROWN: Solar bill is wrong move for GOP

April 8, 2017
DEBATE Q: Should the Legislature change a plan that incentivizes homeowners to install solar panels?

A: I want to be a Republican, I really do.

I’m a successful businessperson, hate paying taxes, and detest government intrusion. But I can’t bring myself to support a party that preaches personal responsibility but practices centralized control and protects certain corporate interests.

State Senate Bill 309 is a great example of that hypocrisy. After all, what could possibly be more Republican than private citizens and businesses assuming control of their electricity use by leveraging the sun to generate their own power? Sadly, my own home in a heavily treed area near Eagle Creek is ill-suited to solar panels, but I’m happy that solar power is a viable option for many of my fellow Hoosiers. Their use of solar benefits me indirectly by decreasing the load on the grid and reducing the need for additional smoke-spewing power plants. Their lower carbon generation improves the quality of the air my kids breathe.

Of course, the advocates of SB 309 will try to mask the true beneficiaries—the large power companies—by arguing that my solar-loving compatriots are being unfair to me. It’s this aspect of the hypocrisy that I resent the most—the absurd contention that the Legislature’s serving as lapdog for large corporate concerns is done for my well-being.

Clearly, Sen. Brandt Hershman and his fellow Republicans want to curry favor with the utilities at the expense of private citizens and small businesses. Don’t insult my intelligence (albeit doubted by Rep. Ed Soliday) by claiming that it’s being done to protect me from those nasty solar freeloaders. I’m far from the smartest guy in the state, but even I can see that distributed power generation makes our state more resilient to natural disasters and reduces the threat of cyberattacks.

The only real problem is that such a tiny portion of our state’s energy use comes from renewables—less than 1 percent. If anything, we should be increasing incentives to our fellow citizens to move to wind and solar more quickly. I’ll gladly pitch in a few pennies each month on my electric bill.

I do have to hand it to the utilities behind this legislation for getting ahead of the curve. They want to build monopolistic walls way before the barbarians are at the gates, and make sure their fortress is on as high a perch as possible. As a businessperson, I can understand. Just don’t have the gall to tell me it’s for my sake.

So, Republican Party, please drop the pretense of supporting individual freedom and personal independence. You’re in the pocket of Big Power and want to ease their concerns about the growing use of rooftop solar and other power generation outside their control. At least have the decency to admit it.•

__________

Brown is an Indiana tech entrepreneur and philanthropist. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.

SB 309 Passes House Utilities on 8-5 Vote

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 29, 2017  /   Posted in 2017 Indiana General Assembly, solar  /   No Comments

House Utilities 3-29-2017

House Utilities Committee Members Voting "NO" on SB 309:

Rep. Mike Speedy (R-Indianapolis)

Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington)

Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville)

Rep. Karle Macer (D-Indianapolis)

Rep. Cherrish Pryor (D-Indianapolis)

IndianaDG says THANK YOU to these five state legislators!

House panel advances bill to trim solar 'subsidy'

A fervent debate on renewable energy may still be heating up.

A House panel on Wednesday advanced a measure to phase down financial incentives for people who sell excess energy from solar panels or wind turbines to utility companies. The 8-5 vote sends Senate Bill 309 to the full House for consideration.

Current rules require utilities to pay the retail rate for the electricity, which is about three times higher than wholesale prices. That incentive, put into place 12 years ago as a means to encourage renewable energy, has offset the costs for homeowners, churches, schools, small businesses and nonprofits to install solar panels and turbines. The exchange is known as net metering.

Senate Bill 309 proposes allowing people who already have solar panels or wind turbines to continue receiving bill credits equal to the higher retail rate for their surplus electricity for the next 30 years, essentially the expected lifespan of their systems. After 2022, people installing new systems would get credits for their surplus electricity at 25 percent higher than the wholesale rate.

An amendment also removed the process for utility companies to petition the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission for a lower rate.

Supporters, including the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, Indiana Energy Association and Indiana Manufacturers Association, say it's a critical time to address net metering before the financial incentive adds up to a larger cost. The lower costs of renewable energy systems also have diminished the need for the higher retail net metering rates, which they refer to as a “subsidy.”

But Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, said he didn't think the issue needed to be taken up.

"We're going to harm small businesses, entrepreneurs, people who are finally getting a foothold," he said before voting against the bill.

Pierce accused utility companies of trying to push back against renewable energy by trying to "sandbag" those using new technologies rather than working to change their own business models.

Other opposition to the bill has come from homeowners, schools and small businesses who have put solar panels on their rooftops, some for concern about climate change and others as a means to reduce their electricity costs. They contend that net metering helps utilities by providing additional sources of electricity, which can be cheaper than wholesale providers during times of peak demand.

Opponents of the bill said Indiana stands to lose its place in the new solar economy to states such as Illinois and Ohio that have more solar-friendly policies. Above all, skeptics said Senate Bill 309 was an effort by the big utilities to continue their monopoly on the electricity supply.

Call IndyStar reporter Stephanie Wang at (317) 444-6184. Follow her on Twitter: @stephaniewang.

Indiana anti-solar net metering bill amend and vote in House Utilities

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 29, 2017  /   Posted in 2017 Indiana General Assembly, solar, Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments

American flag with solar panels

All IndianaDG readers interested in the next saga on the future of net metering and roof-top solar and distributed wind can watch the action on-line today as follows:

WHAT: SB 309 distributed generation and net metering bill

WHEN: Wed., March 29th @ 1:30 pm EDT

WHERE: Room 156-B ,State House, Indianapolis

>>Watch on-line HERE:

https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2017/committees/utilities_and_energy_2000

Click and open March 29, 2017 from the drop down menu.

WHO: House Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications Committee

The Members of the House Utilities Committee are as follows:

Rep. Dave Ober (R-Albion) h82@iga.in.gov CHAIR

Rep. Dale DeVon (R-Granger) H5@iga.in.gov VICE CHAIR

Rep. Heath VanNatter(R-Kokomo) h38@iga.in.gov

Rep. Bob Behning (R-Indianapolis) h91@iga.in.gov

Rep. Dave Frizzell (R-Indianapolis) h93@iga.in.gov

Rep.Mike Speedy (R-Indianapolis) h90@iga.in.gov

Rep.Randy Frye (R-Greensburg) h67@iga.in.gov 

Rep. Alan Morrison (R-TerreHaute) h42@iga.in.gov

Rep.Ed Soliday (R-Valparaiso) h4@iga.in.gov

Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington) h61@iga.in.gov Ranking Minority Member

Rep. Karlee Macer (D-Indianapolis) h92@iga.in.gov

Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville) h77@iga.in.gov

Rep. Cherrish Pryor (D-Indianapolis) h94@iga.in.gov

If SB 309 receives a DO PASS recommendation TODAY (3/29/17) then the first week of April it will move to the Indiana House floor for second reading which allows further amendments by any House member and then third reading or final passage.

Watch for more details at IndianaDG.net.

Don't know who are your state legislators? See

https://iga.in.gov/legislative/find-legislators/

Contact your State representative by calling the House Telephone Center:

(800) 382-9842 or (317) 232-9600

Unless the net metering issue is referred to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC),

ask them to VOTE NO on SB 309.

 

CAC issues legal analysis of anti-solar bill, SB 309

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 27, 2017  /   Posted in 2017 Indiana General Assembly, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

CAC logo

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE    

March 27, 2017                                                                                                                             

Contact: Kerwin Olson, Executive Director 317-735-7727

 

CAC ISSUES LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ANTI-SOLAR BILL, SENATE BILL 309

Controversial legislation not as it appears, CAC calls for IURC to step in

INDIANAPOLIS – Today, Citizens Action Coalition released a legal analysis of the controversial, anti-solar bill SB309 authored by Senator Brandt Hershman (R-Buck Creek).  Jennifer Washburn, Counsel for CAC, authored the memo, which raises significant concerns over the language of the bill and the claims made by proponents of the legislation.

Jennifer Washburn

Jennifer Washburn, Counsel for Citizens Action Coalition (CAC)

“In addition to the seemingly undesirable policy outcomes, several components of the bill suffer from legal infirmities that will likely result in extended litigation, chilling the marketplace and bringing uncertainty to customers and those in the industry,” Ms. Washburn writes in the introduction.

Among others, Ms. Washburn identifies the following concerns and issues with respect to SB309:

  • Whether the investments of current and future net-metering customers are indeed protected by the so-called grandfathering provisions within the bill as touted by proponents of the bill.
  • The ratemaking provisions within the bill for distributed generation customers are undefined, vague, and “so ambiguous as to be unintelligible and is likely to bring excessive litigation from both sides.”
  •  There is no guarantee that future distributed generation customers will receive a rate equal to “wholesale + a 25% bonus,” despite statements to the contrary by proponents of the bill.

These issues when combined with other provisions in the bill “create the same legal and financing uncertainties for the industry, leading to higher costs for Indiana customers. The net effect could be that investment flows to other states,” said Ms. Washburn.

“SB309 has many problems and is likely to produce prolonged litigation.  It is my recommendation that CAC continues to work against this bill or to work on an amendment that would ask the Commission to decide these highly technical and complex issues, particularly as it relates to the pricing and ratemaking provisions.”

The full analysis is available upon request or can be found at:  http://www.citact.org/sites/default/files/309%20Legal%20Analysis--3-26-17-FINAL.pdf

 

####

Illinois launches ‘NextGrid’ utility of the future study

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 23, 2017  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Illinois launches 'NextGrid' utility of the future study

Dive Brief:

  • The Illinois Commerce Commission yesterday launched an 18-month study focused on finding new technologies, utility business models and regulatory strategies to transform the state's grid into a more flexible and efficient resource.
  • The NextGrid study will be led by an outside facilitator and will result in a final report late in 2018 that will include "tangible recommendations" to the ICC and Illinois General Assembly.
  • The study mirrors other grid modernization efforts and holistic utility reviews happening in New York, California, Hawaii and other states.

Dive Insight:

It's no longer just a few states undertaking so-called "utility of the future" proceedings. Ohio, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Maryland and now Illinois have all launched some form of these dockets.

The ICC, in a statement announcing the NextGrid proceeding, said "many experts believe that the electric utility industry will evolve more in the next ten years than it has in the past century with new technologies changing the way electricity is bought, sold, generated and  consumed. This transformation raises important questions about how all aspects of the system interact and what that may mean for consumers, regulators, utilities and other stakeholders."

The study, launched as a a "statewide collaborative," includes a wide range of stakeholders: Citizens Utility Board, ComEd and the state's attorney general all signed on to the announcement.

Environmental Defense Fund said it has also been working with CUB on a new regulatory framework aimed at "empowering customers and communities, driving economic development, and creating an innovative, 21st-century utility business model."

ICC Chairman Brien Sheahan cited the state's long history of "progressive leadership in energy policy," from customer choice laws in 1997 to the 2016 Future Energy Jobs Act.  "We need to support innovation by utilities that builds on our strengths, creates value for consumers, and contributes to growth and development," he said in a statement.

The study complements Exelon's Future Energy Jobs legislation, and was also convened at the recommendation of Gov. Bruce Rauner’s transition committee. Among other things, the 2016 law doubled the state’s energy efficiency portfolio and incentivized renewable energy development.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG