Duke Energy CEO doubts coal industry ‘revival’

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 20, 2017  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments

lynn good mk004

Melissa Key

Lynn Good, CEO of Duke Energy, speaks at the Hood Hargett luncheon on Wednesday at the Palm Restaurant.

Duke Energy CEO doubts coal industry ‘revival’

John Downey, Senior Staff Writer - Charlotte Business Journal

Duke Energy CEO Lynn Good says despite talk of “reviving the coal industry” in the Trump administration, coal remains economically and environmentally challenged — and Duke won’t change its move away from the fuel.

“We have to look through the changes of administration, the changes in politics and set our vision on where we want our company to be and what strategy we are pursuing,” she told more than 70 attendees during the Hood Hargett Breakfast Club luncheon at The Palm Wednesday. “Our strategy will continue to be to drive carbon out of our business.”

She said the economics of coal “are really challenged” and that it would prove more important than any government position. Referring to public policy, she said, “So when I think about administrations, the only person running Duke Energy for 2025, 2030 and 2035 is Duke Energy.”

Nuclear winter

The future of coal was one of more than a dozen audience questions Good addressed as the luncheon’s featured speaker. She last addressed the group three years ago.

She also addressed the future of new nuclear plant construction at Duke (NYSE:DUK), making that sound only a little more likely than development of a new coal plant. And, she made it clear that's not something Duke is looking at short-term.

“You may have been reading about something called the Westinghouse bankruptcy,” she told the audience, referring to Westinghouse Electric Co.’s March 29 filing for Chapter 11 protection from creditors. That filing came after Westinghouse lost more than $6.2 billion as the principal contractor for the only two new-generation U.S. nuclear projects in the United States.

License extension

She said that Duke’s proposed Lee Nuclear Station is supposed to employ the Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactor that has been the subject of construction delays and significant cost overruns at SCANA Corp.’s V.C. Summer Nuclear Station in Jenkinsville, SC., and Southern Co.’s Plant Vogtle in Waynesboro, Ga.

“So we are watching this very carefully,” she said. “But new nuclear takes 7 to 10 years to build, it’s a sizable capital investment and we’ve got some uncertainty right now with the vendor.”

Given that situation, Good said, “Our focus is on maintaining what we have, making those plants survive as long as they possibly can.”

Duke operates 11 nuclear reactors at six sites across the Carolinas. She called them “some of the most valuable assets in the region,” and says the company is inclined to seek regulatory permission to operate them for 20 years beyond their current 60-year licensing limit.

Power transformation

Good took questions for about 40 minutes after a brief speech to the group. In those opening remarks Good focused factors driving transformation at Duke.

She spoke about the Duke’s evolving relationship with customers, and its efforts to be more responsive and to make more information available to the people and businesses on its grid. She outlined efforts to invest in the power delivery system, including Duke’s plans to spend $13 billion over the next 10 years to upgrade the grid.

And she asserted Duke remains committed to providing more clean energy for customers. She said solar has to be an important part of that. But she also counted the move to natural gas from coal as providing cleaner energy and she said the nuclear, which provides 40% of the power in the Carolinas, needs to remain an important part of the energy mix because it provided base load power without carbon emissions.

Fragmented industry

She discussed the recent acquisitions — Progress Energy and Piedmont Natural Gas — and predicted the consolidation in the energy industry would continue.

In response to an audience question, she said power remains a fragmented industry when other utility-style business like telecommunications have long since consolidated largely because the states tend to have such a large role in regulating the power industry. The need for state approval on some many mergers makes completing them more difficult, she said.

“For every merger that closes, there’s one that doesn’t because they couldn’t get regulatory approval to consolidate,” she said.

The telecommunications industry, on the other hand, is regulated largely at the federal level.

She said the fragmentation is even greater in the natural gas industry — in which Duke hopes to expand now following the Piedmont purchase.


John Downey covers the energy industry and public companies for the Charlotte Business Journal.

 

Big Business Pushes Coal-Friendly Kentucky To Embrace Renewables

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 18, 2017  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments

Kevin Butt, Toyota's regional environmental sustainability director, at a facility that uses methane to generate clean electricity to help run Toyota's auto plant in central Kentucky.

Big Business Pushes Coal-Friendly Kentucky To Embrace Renewables

Columbus Community Solar Initiative Respectfully Requests Your Veto of SB 309

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 14, 2017  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

April 14, 2017

Dear Governor Holcomb,

On behalf of the Columbus Community Solar Initiative, this is to respectfully request your veto of SB 309, which will shortly be presented to you to sign, veto or allow to become law without your signature.

The Initiative requests your veto of this bill not only on behalf of its many participants and supporters, but also the children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren which many of us (including the undersigned) have.  We believe that this is a bill which dims their futures, as well as the future of our local Solar Initiative.

The Columbus Community Solar Initiative is an all-volunteer project initiated with strong community support in Fall 2015 with the initial goal of assisting homeowners, businesses and non-profit and governmental organizations to install 1,000 solar panels in Bartholomew County.   To date, through the Initiative, eight homeowners and one church have installed 263 panels, six additional homeowners have contracted and are scheduled to install an additional 117 panels, and eight homeowners and one neighborhood center have executed non-binding letters of intent and received proposals from the Initiative’s partner vendor to contract for and install approximately another 180 panels.  The Initiative is also scheduled to "kick off" in May another round of public information, solicitation of letters of intent, contracting and installation focused on public and private non-profit organizations, including schools, churches, community centers and social service organizations.

The immediate reason that the Initiative is seeking your veto of SB 309 is quite simple – after the bill was filed and became a public issue of considerable controversy and publicity, the Initiative received ZERO new letters of intent, closed ZERO contracts for additional installations, scheduled ZERO installations for dates after June 30, 2017, and was expressly advised by three of its participants presently pondering proposals that they would not contract for installations unless and until SB 309 had been defeated or substantially amended. Since the bill was amended to its current form, we have received one telephone inquiry from a prospective participant and had one existing participant advance from a preliminary proposal to a site visit preparatory to a final proposal.  But, otherwise, the Initiative has remained in a state of suspended animation pending final action on the bill, with no new signed letters of intent or contracts.

With an amendment extending the 30-year net metering "grandfathering" provision to installations completed by December 31, 2017, as well as to successor owners of those installations, we would anticipate that some of our participants who have placed their projects on hold will decide to sign their contracts IF they can be guaranteed of completed installations by the new, later cut-off date.  But, we also expect other current participants will decide not to proceed and that we will have few if any future participants because the provisions of and the circumstance surrounding SB 309 have led those present and prospective participants to lose faith in their elected officials when it comes to making future energy policy for the State of Indiana.

Stated frankly, those present and prospective participants believe that the Indiana Energy Association has exercised undue influence to prevail on the General Assembly to dramatically "change the rules in the middle of the game" -- notwithstanding a massive outpouring of public opposition by ordinary citizens, opinion leaders, numerous public interest organizations, and the great majority of the State's newspapers which have editorialized on the matter.

In this context, there are three aspects of the bill being presented to you which are most troubling to us:

  1. The bill is premised on the assumption that residential, commercial, governmental and institutional customers of investor-owned utilities who spend tens of thousands of dollars of their own money to "go solar" are somehow being subsidized by those customers who do not or cannot do so.  Yet, this assumption is not based on any Indiana-specific study or evidence and is contrary to the great majority of studies and virtually all of the evidence developed in other states by credible, independent entities.
  1. The bill replaces the existing, simple "net metering" regime in which customer-generators and their utilities "swap" killowatt-hours on a one-for-one basis with a complex "net billing" regime in which so called "net excess generation" would be sold by customers and bought by utilities.  These sales of electricity would be made at a legislatively-determined rate that the bill's author has himself characterized as "admittedly arbitrary," instead of at a rate determined by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to meet the traditional "just and reasonable" standard enshrined in both state and federal law and jurisprudence based on credible evidence of record duly considered after notice and hearing extended to all concerned.
  1. The bill makes this dramatic change in Indiana energy law and policy at a time when only one-eighth of one percent of the peak load of the State's investor-owned utilities is being met by "net metered" customer-owned generation. even though the "existing rules of the game" set a target of one percent of peak load and those rules are not scheduled to expire under current law until January 1, 2020.  Moreover, this abrupt and dramatic change is being made with no proceeding, no investigation and no findings of fact or conclusions of law by the Utility Regulatory Commission, a blue ribbon panel, or a legislative study committee with the resources and the expertise required to investigate, evaluate and report on such a critical and controversial change in the State's energy law and policy.

Governor, with all due respect, to the vast majority of your constituents with an opinion on the matter, including the participants and supporters of the Columbus Community Solar Initiative, SB 309 becoming law under these circumstances would be nothing more than government of, by, and for the investor-owned monopoly utilities of this State.

Accordingly, the Columbus Community Solar Initiative respectfully requests that you exercise your ultimate authority as Chief Executive of the State of Indiana to veto SB 309 as contrary to the best interests of the State of Indiana and its citizenry, both at present and in the future.

Thank you for your attention and your consideration of our request.

Respectfully,

Michael A. Mullett

Volunteer Administrative Coordinator

Columbus Community Solar Initiative

723 Lafayette Avenue
Columbus, IN 47201
Phone: (812) 376-0734
Fax: (812) 376-0734
E-Mail: MullettGEN@aol.com

Hoosiers Messages to Gov. Holcomb to VETO SB 309

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 14, 2017  /   Posted in 2017 Indiana General Assembly, solar  /   No Comments

Image may contain: outdoor

Pictured above is Governor Eric Holcomb and First Dog Henry. It's a #GoodFriday.

A new group forming called Hoosier Canines for Solar!

UPDATE on Status of SB 309:

As of yesterday (4/13/17). SB 309, the bill destroying net metering which is the single most important Indiana state policy to encourage Hoosiers to to buy and install solar, small wind and biomass HAD NOT BEEN DELIVERED YET TO GOVERNOR HOLCOMB.

2017 BILL WATCH

Enrolled acts signed by the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Tempore are sent to the Office of the Lt. Governor for signature, are then returned to the Office of the Secretary of the Senate (for Senate Enrolled Acts) or the Clerk of the House of Representatives (for House Enrolled Acts), and then go to the Office of the Governor. From there, the Governor reviews all legislation and has seven days to sign or veto the bill. If he does not sign it, it automatically becomes law on the eighth day after receipt.

Today (4/14/17) is a State Holiday and therefore, the next earliest day SB 309 could arrive in the Governor's Office is Monday, April 17, 2017.

Many solar supporters have recruited their children and grand children to craft messages to Governor Eric Holcomb to VETO SB 309. Here are just a few pictured below:

Displaying PastedGraphic-73.png

Displaying PastedGraphic-74.png

Perhaps this is a good family activity over this holiday weekend. Please don't procrastinate though. All the bills delivered to Governor Holcomb on 4/13/17 were signed the same day.

Governor Holcomb appears to be fond of puppies and dogs as evidenced by these photos from his Facebook page. Perhaps you can include a photo of your favorite canine with your message to Governor Holcomb asking him to VETO SB 309. It's worth a try! 🙂

>>>Mailto: govholcomb@gov.in.gov

Governor Holcomb and his wife, Janet, live with their dog, Henry, in the Governor’s Residence on North Meridian Street in Indianapolis.

Woof, woof!

Listen up Indiana: Solar installations crater in Hawaii after net metering incentives gutted

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 11, 2017  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Is there such a thing as a bad photo of a solar array from Hawaii? (No. No there is not.)

Is there such a thing as a bad photo of a solar array from Hawaii? (No. No there is not.)

News Analysis: Installations crater in Hawaii after incentives gutted

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG