SEPA: The Four Dos of Green Tariffs (and One Don’t)

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 01, 2018  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 SEPA logo

The Four Dos of Green Tariffs (and One Don’t)

  

More than 90 percent of the world’s largest companies put out a sustainability report. Two-thirds of the Fortune 100 have renewable energy goals and, according to the Business Renewables Center Deal Tracker. So far this year, companies have publicly announced their intention to purchase 3.86 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy.

U.S. Renewable Energy Map: A Guide for Corporate Buyers

Where customers can buy large-scale renewable energy through the grid. Visit the World Resources Institute website for the full interactive map. (Source: World Resources Institute)

How will these customers access renewable energy? The answer may be green tariffs. Green tariffs make sense as a next-generation renewable power solution for customers, utilities and regulators due to the confluence of two trends:

  1. A growing number of commercial and industrial electricity customers want to significantly increase their use of renewable energy to meet sustainability initiatives and contribute to carbon emissions reductions.
  2. As the cost of renewable energy continues to decline, customers have become more likely to seek potential economic benefit by including long-term renewable contracts as part of their power mix.

Traditional green pricing programs provide access to renewable energy, but typically at a premium tied to the utility’s regular rate and often without access to the corresponding renewable energy credits, or RECs. Green tariffs, on the other hand, provide economic benefit by providing a long-term hedge against fluctuating fossil fuel prices because customers have locked in a fixed price for renewable energy that isn’t pegged to the regular rate.

Additionally, because green tariffs are bundled with renewable energy credits, they provide a verifiable way to achieve sustainability objectives, to which many large companies increasingly have pledged. A Smart Electric Power Alliance (SEPA) survey of a small sample of Fortune 500 companies found that 90 percent of their reported renewable energy consumption in 2016 was based on unbundled renewable energy credits. As I wrote in March, green power pricing generally involves unbundled renewable energy credits that neither add new renewable generation resources to the local grid nor provide the customer with renewable energy credits to retire or sell.

Green tariffs are more attractive to some customers than behind-the-meter alternatives, such as installing their own solar panels. Aside from the practical difficulty of generating large-scale power on their own, companies may prefer to focus on their own core business while leveraging the utility’s expertise in generation and distribution.

For utilities, green tariffs can be an improvement over historical green pricing plans in several ways. First, and importantly, they provide another attractive option for larger customers, helping retain and/or attract major commercial and industrial customers in their service territory.

Utilities also benefit from continued engagement in the decision process about where best to site new renewable generation resources, which helps ensure optimal operation of and value to the local grid. For example, as part of the negotiation of a new green tariff involving a power purchase agreement between a large industrial customer and a solar generation company, the utility is best positioned to know which points on the system are best suited to accommodate new generation, potentially reducing the overall project cost.

For regulators and other policymakers, green tariffs provide the opportunity to create an economic “ring fence” around contracts between utilities and their largest customers, ensuring that additional renewable capacity is built without subsidization to or from customers in other rate classes. Over the long term, this benefit should enable more approval of renewable projects with less controversy.

Dynamic Duos: Utility Green tariffs and Corporate Buyers 

What should utilities look to do when creating green tariff deals – and what should they avoid? We’ll explore those questions during this Nov. 8 webinar while I speak with representatives of both sides of the same green tariff deal. I ask utilities and customers to describe the process from day one to execution. Heather Mulligan, market manager for solar programs at Puget Sound Energy – a pioneer in green tariffs – and Patrick Leonard, manager of energy and resource management at Starbucks, which signed a green tariff agreement with Puget Sound Energy to power dozens of its Washington state stores with renewable energy, will be my guests.

Dos and Don’ts

In the meantime, our discussions with utilities across the country point to some clear lessons for those considering green tariff development.

  • Do diversify renewable energy offerings to meet market demand. Large commercial and industrial customers are looking for alternatives to either their own behind-the-meter renewable capacity or green pricing programs. Community solar programs continue to gain traction in many markets as a viable alternative, while green tariffs provide another path to renewable power for a utility’s larger customers.
  • Do engage early and often with customers, regulators and stakeholders. As the market for renewable energy expands, utilities will be responsible not only for rolling out new products but for educating the community about a market that isn’t intuitively easy to understand. Take the time to develop a strategic process of dialogue, education and negotiation with the goal of ensuring all parties are on the same page.
  • Do offer flexibility in green tariff design. Among early green tariff programs, success stories include a range of designs. These include asset ownership by the utility or the customer; sleeved power purchase agreements vs. a subscriber model; and various lengths of power purchase agreement or contract duration. Tailoring the tariff to the customer’s needs and constraints helps ensure a positive experience that will attract more customers.
  • Do transfer renewable energy credits to the customer or retire them on behalf of the customer. Including renewable energy credits with electrons is one of the prime benefits of green tariffs, helping commercial and industrial customers nail down sustainability goals over a multi-year period.
  • Don’t develop products without understanding your customers. Successful pioneers in the market took the time to research their customer bases’ preferences, both through conversation and market research.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Salesforce invests in wind farm as it grows in Chicago area

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 31, 2018  /   Posted in wind  /   No Comments
Corilyn ShropshireChicago Tribune

Tech firm Salesforce said it will back the construction of a new renewable energy wind farm in McLean County, a project that has been in the planning stages for 10 years.

The Bright Stalk Wind Farm will be built near Bloomington-Normal, and owned and operated by EDP Renewables North America, the Houston-based company behind five other renewable energy projects in Illinois. Bright Stalk will produce enough electricity to power 71,000 average homes, the company said.

The 15-year deal will allow Salesforce to balance out a portion of the energy the company consumes from its offices and data centers with “renewable energy.

EDP Renewables hopes to begin construction on the roughly $300 million project by next spring, according to Ryan Brown, EDP Renewables’ North America executive vice president, Eastern Region & Canada.

The deal helps solidify the company’s presence in Illinois, Brown said. “This is an area of the country where you have very strong wind resources and communities and landowners with an interest in hosting new projects,” he said.

Salesforce executives declined to disclose the size of the wind farm investment.

Salesforce, based in San Francisco, has plans to expand its presence in the Chicago area. The company already employs nearly 1,500 workers in Chicago. It is in talks to take up to 500,000 square feet of new office space on the north side of the Chicago River.

The wind farm’s location in rural McLean County is important because it is halfway between Salesforce’s data centers south of Chicago and near Indianapolis. While the wind farm may not power Salesforce’s Midwest operations, it helps offset the number of megawatt-hours used by the business. For each megawatt-hour of electricity produced by the wind farm, Salesforce earns the revenue generated by the electricity and a renewable energy credit.

In recent years, other businesses have upped their investments in renewable energy. In 2016, Chicago-based Invenergy partnered with Google to support the tech firm’s large data center operations. In 2015, Amazon invested in a wind energy farm near Lafayette, Ind.

In 2015, Salesforce committed to powering 100 percent of its operations with renewable energy by 2022. “Our real end goal is a fully de-carbonized (electricity) grid globally,” said Patrick Flynn, the company’s vice president of sustainability.

crshropshire@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @corilyns

Ohio business community backs 2.2 GW of Ohio solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 31, 2018  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

State of Ohio flag

Ohio business community backs 2.2 GW of Ohio solar

Trump takes coal proposal on tour of Southern Indiana

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 30, 2018  /   Posted in 2018 Midterm Elections, Hoosier Energy (HE), solar  /   No Comments

Trump takes coal proposal on tour

Coal mines around the Hoosier state and country could see fewer regulations with President Donald Trump's Affordable Clean Energy or ACE proposal.

 

Trump takes coal proposal on tour

Mike Grant, Washington (IN) Times Herald, Aug 29, 2018

President Donald Trump is headed to southwestern Indiana. There is no guarantee he will talk about his new Affordable Clean Energy rule for the Environmental Protection Agency but it only makes sense that he would while making a stop in an area that sits in the middle of coal producing areas in Illinois, Kentucky and Indiana.

Trump announced the plan last week in Charlestown, West Virginia. It would do away with the Obama Clean Power Plan rule, and replace it with one that allows individual states to set limits for carbon dioxide emissions.

“We are putting our coal miners back to work,” said Trump, in an Associated Press story last week.

Republican Eighth District Indiana Congressman Larry Bucshon called Trump’s move the right one.

“The Obama Administration put in the Clean Power Plan which really was the death knell for the coal industry,” said Bucshon. “What they were doing in the previous administration was putting in regulations that could not be met with current technology. It would shut down the coal industry.”

During Obama’s second term, the coal industry in Indiana began to slow down. That happened even though a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2016 stopped the provisions of the EPA rule from being put into effect.

“I am an ‘all the above’ energy believer and coal is a piece of that,” said Bucshon. “This area of the country is rich in coal and every coal miner in the state of Indiana is in my district.”

Bucshon’s opponent in the fall election, William Tanoos, questions who will really benefit from the change.

“I understand the President is trying to bolster coal, and coal is important in the Eighth District,” said Tanoos, a Democrat from Terre Haute. “My concern is with the miner. This will benefit those at the top but not the worker and at the same time increase pollution and the negative health impacts that brings.”

He called the measure disappointing.

“There is a lot that could be done to improve the plight of miners, and this does nothing to address that,” said Tanoos. “It just takes the cap off of pollution.”

In Daviess County, Solar Sources still operates mines in the eastern part of the county. Earlier this year the company reopened the Billings Pit that had been closed. The Trump plan seems to be getting a warm reception.

“It could be beneficial to eliminate the clean power plan and allow the states to regulate carbon dioxide emissions,” said Mike Owen, regulatory consultant for Solar Sources . “If they let each state set limits on carbon dioxide it will look much different than the national, one size fits all system, that Obama was pushing. This recognizes that there are different kinds of coal in different regions. Illinois basin coal is different from Powder River coal and that is different than Texas coal.”

Owen says the change of EPA rules could have a positive impact on mining in the area.

“In the short term, I believe it could mean more mining,” he said. “I am not sure how quickly it can all go into effect. These rules will probably be challenged in court. The Hoosier Environmental Council and the Sierra Club are still around.”

The last coal burning power plant built in southern Indiana was the $1 billion Edwardsport Plant constructed by Duke Energy in northern Knox County. While the coal industry may have been struggling, renewable power operations began popping up in the area. Hoosier Energy built a solar farm along Interstate-69 near the Crane exit. Indiana Municipal Power Agency built a 4-megawatt solar operation in Washington and Duke Energy is in the process of constructing a solar operation at the Crane Naval Warfare Center.

“The old rules were forcing out older coal plants and forcing others to go natural gas,” said Owen. “Older coal plants have been shutting down and they were not coming back. Hoosier Energy closed a plant at Petersburg. Marginal plants that had reached 30 years on line were being shut down. This will allow them to continue to operate at an economic advantage to rate payers. Utility companies will be able to make small changes to improve air quality instead of trying to reach for everything at once.”

“What the Trump administration is doing is putting in regulation that is reasonable, that can be met with reasonable technology,” said Bucshon. “That will help the coal industry here in Indiana. We need to continue to advance innovation and technology which we will, but you just can’t put onerous regulation in place like the Clean Power Plan.”

Still, Tanoos believes the Trump bill could have put in some regulations that did more than turn the coal companies and the utilities loose.

“They could have tied the emission levels to job training or put more money toward retirement for the workers,” he said. “I understand the intent of the rule. It does nothing for the workers and only helps those at the top and in the end, the EPA estimates as many 1,400 deaths could be tied to this proposal.”

The Indiana Coal Council contends Indiana has around 24 active mines operated by a dozen companies that produce 32 million tons of coal. Including trucking and other ancillary workers, the mining industry supports 2,500 jobs in Indiana.

“I see this change as positive, but we will still have to see what the full impact will be,” said Owen.

Officials point out that since 2010, utilities have retired or announced plans to retire 630 coal-fired power plants in 43 states. That is roughly the equivalent of 40 percent of all coal-fired power plants in the country.

Still, the change is expected to make a difference in the coal fields.

“I am very excited they have decided to put in regulation that backs up a little bit and lets us work where we are,” said Bucshon. “We can still try to do what we can to make the air as clean as possible, but now do it with the available technology, so I’m pleased.”

Big steel goes big solar in Colorado; Why not in Indiana?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 20, 2018  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments

Big steel goes big solar

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG