German Coalition Agrees on Extending Nuclear Energy Until Replaced by Renewable Energy Sources

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 26, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

German Coalition Agrees on Nuclear Energy, Handelsblatt Says

By Oliver Suess

Oct. 23 (Bloomberg) -- German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats and the Free Democratic Party agreed to extend the use of nuclear energy, Handelsblatt reported.

The lifespan of German nuclear power plants will be extended until they can be “reliably replaced” by renewable energy sources, the newspaper said, citing a draft of the coalition agreement it obtained.

To contact the reporter on this story: Oliver Suess in Munich at osuess@bloomberg.net

Excerpt from www.Handelsblatt.com automatically translated from German to English with Google Toolbar:
...
The black-yellow coalition, moreover, laid down their energy policy course. The operators of nuclear power plants have to adjust accordingly to tough negotiations with the future government. In its coalition agreement to approve the CDU, CSU and FDP only a role of nuclear power as a transitional technology. Industry representatives complained that the plant operators were "certainly not among the winners of the coalition negotiations." On the other hand, welcomed the Renewable Energy Sector, the coalition agreements.

In the energy chapter of the coalition agreement states that nuclear energy is a bridge technology that would use it, "until they could reliably be replaced by renewable energies." "We are prepared to extend the maturities German nuclear power plants in compliance with the strict German and international safety standards." As late as Tuesday evening, this wording had been: "We shall extend the maturities. The three party leaders, however, sat by the slowdown. Both Chancellor Angela Merkel and FDP leader Guido Westerwelle emphasized, according to participants at the final talks on the energy chapter, there are no blank checks for longer maturities.

The tips of the CDU, CSU and FDP, given the energy chapter of the coalition agreement as early as Wednesday evening, her blessing. Other chapters are still controversial. At the weekend, the coalition will present the complete contract.

According to the Union and FDP coalition agreement "in a meeting as soon as possible agreement to be reached with the operators' schemes for runtime extensions. Union leaders stressed that the arrangements would "set for steam power plant. Before it terrified the industry already. The four nuclear power plant operators feared - Eon, RWE, EnBW and Vattenfall - that it could be just for one or the other plant: "This is a tough struggle for each reactor." However, the starting positions of the firms are different. While the reactor for RWE Biblis, for EnBW with Neckarwestheim and Vattenfall Brunsbüttel time is pressing, can be left Eon. The group is involved only as a co-Brunsbüttel, otherwise the company's facilities have comparatively rich residual amounts of electricity. RWE, EnBW and Vattenfall have their kiln, however saved only with difficulty in the new legislature, the residual amounts of electricity, which allocates the Atomic Energy Act, the facilities are almost empty.

Union leaders emphasize that the energy part of the coalition agreement is in no way be construed as decided by management of the nuclear phase-to red-green. Indeed, it is a real paradigm shift towards renewables. "We want to go the way into the regenerative period and expand its technology leadership in renewable energy," says the coalition agreement. Similarly positive assessment of the industry the contract. "We see a number of very clear and very positive terms, which was a good basis for our work," it when Federal Association for Renewable Energies. Even with the formulations to promote Photolvoltaik can live the industry

On this issue there had been intense discussions during the negotiations. In particular, FDP politicians had criticized the photovoltaic funding was excessive. The Treaty is now stated that they would resolve in a dialogue with solar industry and consumer advocates, "with which adjustments in the short term over-funding in the photovoltaic can be avoided." Even consumer watchdogs have criticized the promotion of photovoltaics, which is passed on to electricity customers, as too high.

A dialogue between politics and solar industry would make sense, "said Andreas Hänel, CEO of Phoenix Solar, the Handelsblatt. He warned to cut subsidies as part of the policy demanded by 30 percent. This would damage the industry as the price decrease in solar modules, not one leave transferable to the feed-in tariffs. Pricing for the modules have recently fallen rapidly.

Specific attention paid to the future coalition partners the energy companies. In the energy chapter, the Federal Ministry instructed to consider "what measures to maintain the competitiveness of electricity-intensive industries" are required. In addition, states that the coalition is set to ensure that energy companies remain the exception to continue the auctioning of emission rights. The companies evaluated these statements carefully. Investment decisions could not pronounce on this basis, it said.

New ASES Report Estimating the Jobs Impact of Tackling Climate Change

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 25, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

The American Solar Energy Society is rolling out a new report 10/30/09. It shows that tackling climate change can be a major net job creator for the U.S. economy.

According to the report, aggressive deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency can net up to 4.5 million new U.S. jobs by 2030 and provide the greenhouse gas emission reductions necessary to tackle climate change.

With Congress debating energy policy in Washington D.C., this is the type of information that can really make a difference.

Renewable energy and energy efficient technologies could displace approximately 1.2 billion tons of carbon emissions annually by 2030 - the amount scientists believe is necessary to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change.

The report is called, Estimating the Jobs Impact of Tackling Climate Change, and was produced by ASES and top economists at Management Information Services, Inc. based in Washington, D.C.

The report can be found at: www.ases.org/climatejobs

Here's one of the best parts. According to the analysis, renewable energy and energy efficiency deployment costs would be revenue neutral or better!

That's because the costs to implement the technologies are offset by savings from lower energy bills, making total net costs near zero.

As Brad Collins, ASES' Executive Director described it, "The twin challenges of climate change and economic stagnation can be solved by the same action-broad, aggressive, sustained deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency. The solution for one is the solution for the other."

This jobs report offers the most detailed analysis yet on the potential role of the new energy economy in tackling climate change.

It builds on the powerful findings of ASES' groundbreaking 2007 report Tackling Climate Change in the U.S.: Potential Carbon Emissions Reductions From Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by 2030 edited by Chuck Kutscher.

Check out the report: www.ases.org/climatejobs

This jobs report offers the most detailed analysis yet on the potential role of the new energy economy in tackling climate change.

Report findings show that:

•Aggressive deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency can net 4.5
million new jobs by 2030. These jobs are not limited to certain regions or sectors – they are widely dispersed throughout the U.S. in virtually all industries and occupations.
•Hot jobs spurred by this new economic growth span a diverse range of skills and experience and include: electricians, plumbers, carpenters, administrative assistants, machinists, cashiers,
management analysts, civil engineers, and sheet metal workers.
•Renewable energy and energy efficient technologies could displace approximately 1.2 billion tons of carbon emissions annually by 2030 – the amount scientists believe is necessary to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change.
•Approximately 57% of carbon emissions reductions would be from energy efficiency and 43% would be from renewable energy.
•Energy efficiency measures can allow U.S. carbon emissions to remain about level through 2030, while renewable technologies can provide large reductions in carbon emissions below current levels
•Industries showing the largest job gains include: construction, farming, professional services, public sector, retail, truck transportation, fabricated metals and electrical equipment.
•The construction industry directly benefits from almost all the growing renewable energy and energy efficiency sectors as well as from improvements in overall economic growth due to energy savings. Farming directly benefits from biomass and biofuel technology growth.
•Many of these jobs can not be easily outsourced due to the on-site nature required by these roles.
•The greatest numbers of renewable energy jobs are generated by solar photovoltaics, biofuels, biomass, and concentrating solar power sectors.

The report suggests that policy can play a significant role in both generating jobs and mitigating carbon emissions.

The Indiana Renewable Energy Association is the official state chapter of the American Solar Energy Society. For more information visit www.indianarenew.org.

T. Boone Pickens to Speak at University of Notre Dame Mon., Oct. 26th

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 24, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Editor's note: I received this message from Team Pickens and thought I would pass it on. Pickens recently appeared at Indiana University in Bloomington on September 18.

If you missed the Indiana University speaking appearance, it is still available on-line at http://broadcast.iu.edu/lectures/pickens_09/index.html

Boone will be appearing at the University of Notre Dame for a Town Hall meeting on Monday, October 26 at 5:00 pm. He will be giving an update on the Pickens Plan and taking questions from the audience.

Following are the event details:

Town Hall Meeting with T. Boone Pickens
Sponsored by the Mendoza College of Business and the Office of the Provost

Monday, October 26, 2009
5:00 pm

University of Notre Dame DeBartolo Performing Arts Center
100 Performing Arts Center
Notre Dame, IN 46556

The event is free but this is a ticketed event that is open to the campus and local communities. Tickets will be distributed on a first-come, first-serve basis beginning at 3 pm on Monday, October 26 at the performing arts center.

If you are unable to attend in person, we’ll be covering the event on our blog, Daily Pickens. You can also follow us on Twitter @pickensplan and Facebook.com/PickensPlan for updates.

-- Team Pickens

For more information about renewable energy in Indiana, visit www.indianarenew.org.

China to take due responsibilities in climate issue

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 23, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

China supports the development of a low-carbon economy, and will not shrug off its due responsibilities in countering global climate change, an environment expert with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) said Thursday.

Although China has not made quantified emission reduction commitments so far, the country will not step back from the responsibility to protect the global climate, Pan Jiahua, director of the CASS Research Center for Urban Development and Environment, said at a press conference on CASS's Annual Report on Climate Change Actions 2009.

China has not voiced objection to the long-term objective to keep temperature increases below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), he added.

In fact, he said, China has done a lot to address climate changes.

China and India on Wednesday signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) on cooperation in dealing with climate change.

Last Month, Chinese President Hu Jintao said that the country would cut carbon dioxide emissions per unit of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by "a notable margin" in the decade to 2020.

The country has also committed to raising the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to 15 percent by 2020.

Pan said China could make even greater contributions to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, with sufficient and quantified financing and technology support from developed countries.

But he also added that conditions were not yet ripe for China, still a developing country, to make quantified emission reduction commitments, or to specify when its emissions might peak at the current stage.

He cited such facts as China still being in the middle of the industrialization and urbanization process, its still growing population, incomplete infrastructure, and relatively limited access to technologies and financing.

The development came just two months ahead of the Copenhagen meeting scheduled in December. About 190 countries are expected to attend the meeting and renew greenhouse gases emissions reduction targets set by the Kyoto Protocol, which are to expire in 2012.

But according to a separate report released by the CASS Thursday, the think tank was not certain whether the Copenhagen meeting would produce all expected results due to disputes among nations.

In the UN climate change talk held in Bangkok from Sept 28 to Oct 9, the report said, some developed countries proposed to abandon the principle of the "common but differentiated responsibilities" among developed and developing countries in line with the Bali Roadmap.

The proposal posed obstacles to a fruitful round of talks in Copenhagen, the report said.

It said it was possible that only a framework political protocol would be reached in Copenhagen, leaving specific targets for greenhouse gas emission reduction to be discussed in later talks.

Sullivan Takes Issue with Hershman on position Lugar & Bayh should take on pending federal climate change legislation

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 22, 2009  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Editor's note: State Rep. Mary Ann Sullivan (D-Indianapolis) responded to State Sen. Brandt Hershman's Letter to the Editor urging that Hoosiers contact Sens. Lugar and Bayh to oppose climate change or cap and trade legislation pending before the U.S. Congress. We urge everyone to educate themselves on this important issue and communicate your views to Sens. Lugar and Bayh.

For our health, jobs, we must pass climate legislation

Indianapolis Star, October 22, 2009
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009910220378

While I agree with my colleague, state Sen. Brandt Hershman, that hearing from constituents is important (Letters, Oct. 4), I take issue with his comments regarding how U.S. Sens. Richard Lugar and Evan Bayh should vote on economy-boosting climate legislation.

The Senate clearly has an opportunity not just to cut carbon emissions that endanger our health and the health of our children and grandchildren, but also to grow jobs in Indiana.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the cost of implementing the elements of a federal climate bill would add up to the equivalent of a postage stamp a day per family, with low-income families realizing a $40 benefit by 2020. By 2030, the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy estimates an average saving of nearly $4,000 per U.S. household through the energy efficiency provisions alone.

Legislation that creates jobs, saves consumers money and reduces our dependence on foreign oil makes sense for Indiana and the country. I join millions of my fellow Americans in encouraging Lugar and Bayh to vote for this crucial bill, and help put Hoosiers back to work.

State Rep. Mary Ann Sullivan

House District 97

Indianapolis

--------------------------------------

Cap-and-trade disadvantages outweigh any potential good

Indianapolis Star, October 4, 2009
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009910040328

As an elected official, I know the power of contact by constituents. Therefore, I encourage you to join me in writing, calling or e-mailing U.S. Sens. Richard Lugar and Evan Bayh and urging them to vote against the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation now pending in the U.S. Senate.

This is dangerous legislation that will harm the U.S. economy far more than it will help the world's ecological condition.

According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, some estimates show the cost of living for a typical Hoosier household could rise by as much as $1,600 per year if this proposal becomes law. Others say this is a conservative inflationary figure and Indiana residents might pay substantially more.

One study conducted by the National Manufacturers Association revealed this legislation could cost Indiana nearly 60,000 jobs over the next two decades. Other estimates assert as many as 3 million American jobs could be lost by 2030.

And for what noble purpose? Ecologically, some say the impact will be minimal, at best, if the U.S. is the only participant. Two of our biggest global economic partners, China and India, have no plans to enact cap-and-trade legislation of their own. Their factories will keep on humming, putting pollutants in the air, money in their own bank accounts and, likely, more Americans out of work.

Cap-and-trade could be called a job killer and a massive new tax on energy. Congress should wait until there is an international agreement on carbon dioxide emissions that includes other industrial powers like India and China before committing to painful and perhaps futile reductions at home.

Brandt Hershman

Indiana State Senator, Senate District 7

For more information visit http://www.indianarenew.org.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG