Consumer & Environmental Groups Say Settlement on Edwardsport IGCC BAD for Indiana

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 18, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 

NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release:

September 17, 2010                                                         

Contact: Kerwin Olson (317) 702-0461 
John Blair (812) 464-5663                                        
 
Today, a coalition of consumer and environmental watchdog groups announced their opposition to the recently filed settlement agreement pertaining to the Edwardsport IGGC power plant currently under construction in Knox County, IN. 
 
The settlement, which still requires approval from The Utility Regulatory Commission, is unacceptable to the intervening parties for the following reasons.  
 
1)     It allows Duke to continue construction of the problem plagued project, even though Duke’s own witnesses state that cancelling the plant today is the least cost option for consumers.
2)     It does not provide a “hard-cap” on the cost of the project as the settlement claims but still allows Duke to increase capital costs above their latest estimates.
3)     The so-called “hard-cap” fails to include future environmental compliance costs, costs associated with governmental action, or “acts of God”.  Again, this allows Duke to raise costs above the so called “cap”.  Carbon compliance costs alone could cost additional billions of dollars.
4)     Limits prudency review of costs to only those above $2.75 billion, which is even higher than the estimate previously approved by the Commission.
5)     Duke’s acceptance of a “reduced” return is limited to only costs above the already approved $2.35B costs estimate.
6)     The self-imposed rate case moratorium until 2012 does nothing to protect consumers from the plant which will come online in 2012, which is when Duke would have filed a rate case anyway.
7)     Proposed changes to depreciation and capital are short lived as they can be lost in the next rate case in 2012.
 
“This settlement does nothing to change the fact that this plant first and foremost is not needed by Duke to fulfill their legal obligation of providing reliable electricity to their customers and is far too expensive,” stated Kerwin Olson, Program Director for the Citizens Action Coalition. 
 
Mr. Olson continued: “The Commission should reject this settlement in its entirety, immediately halt construction, and initiate an investigation on whether or not the project is necessary to meet demand and is in the public interest.”
 
John Blair, President of Valley Watch, asserts, "Duke and the OUCC have been complicit in misleading the public since this project was first proposed.  We outlined these exact pitfalls in our testimony before the IURC in August 2007 (http://valleywatch.net/index.asp?id_nav=3 ).  Unfortunately, the IURC and the OUCC failed to listen and now Indiana ratepayers in 69 counties will suffer needlessly for their complicity."
 
    *********************************************************************************
 
Grant Smith, Executive Director for Citizens Action Coalition: 1-317-442-8802

Richard Hill, President of Save the Valley: 1-812-273-6015

John Blair, President of Valley Watch: 1-812-464-5663

IDEA Files Petition to Intervene in NIPSCO Feed-in Tariff Case

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 15, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Today (9/15/2010) Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates, Inc. (IDEA) filed a petition to intervene in the Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) case in Cause No. 43922. In this proceeding NIPSCO is proposing a to change in their net metering tariff and to propose a new feed-in tariff (FiT).

You can download IDEA's petition to intervene here:

43922_IDEA_Petition

The other participants currently include the Indiana Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and the Citizens Action Coalition (CAC) of Indiana.

If you are interested in more information or would like to support IDEA's petition to intervene, please contact Laura Ann Arnold at (317) 635-1701 or via email Laura.Arnold@indianaDG.org.

Technical Conference Set for 9/21 in NIPSCO Net Metering and Feed-in Tariff Case

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 14, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) approved the pre-hearing conference order on September 8, 2010 in the NIPSCO Net Metering and Feed-in Tariff case in Cause No. 43922. 

The Prehearing Conference Order can be downloaded here: 

43922order_090810[1]_prehearing conference order 

Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates (IDEA) plans to file a Petition to Intervene later this week and to participate in this proceeding to establish a revised net metering tariff and a new feed-in tariff for NIPSCO electric customers. 

The next step in this case is as follows: 

Technical Conference in Cause No. 43922 on Tuesday, September 21,2010 at 9:30 a.m., EDT, in Room 222 of the PNC Center, 101 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana.
An agenda, and any material supporting the specific issues to be addressed during the Technical Conference, shall be filed by the Petitioner on or before September 17, 2010.

  

  

To support IDEA and our participation in this case, please download, sign and return this Statement of Support. 

STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR IDEA in NIPSCO case 

AP: Ind. panel’s proposal would expand `net metering’

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 08, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
By RICK CALLAHAN (AP)

 

INDIANAPOLIS — A proposed expansion of Indiana's rules dictating which owners of wind turbines and other renewable power systems get credit for excess power they generate is drawing early support from clean energy advocates.

The draft "net metering" rule would boost the state's power cap for renewable power units and expand it to all customer classes served by electric utilities.

Under net metering, customers are charged only for the net amount of power they use. They get credit on future bills for excess power generated and sent into the electric grid.

But Indiana's current rules apply only to homeowners and K-12 schools and set a 10-kilowatt limit for each customer tapping the wind, sun or other clean energy sources.

The proposal drafted by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and released last week calls for expanding net metering to all customer classes and raising the power capacity 100-fold to 1 megawatt.

The panel agreed to revise the rules at the behest of state Sen. James Merritt, R-Indianapolis, after a push to update them failed in the Legislature's closing days this March for the second straight year.

Merritt said Tuesday he had not reviewed the proposed changes. But he said he's eager to hear the details of a technical workshop the commission will host Thursday on the draft rules.

Steve Francis of the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club said the group is "very supportive" of the proposed cap expansion and extending the rule to businesses, industries and municipalities — the classes he said would benefit most from a far higher cap.

"In our view, this will expand the use of net metering significantly in Indiana, create jobs that can't be outsourced and make Indiana more competitive with other states," he said.

Commission spokeswoman Danielle McGrath said the panel decided to revise the rules after public hearings in Indianapolis, Owensville and South Bend in June showed there was support.

McGrath said the proposed rule will be published in the Indiana Register, followed by a public hearing and a vote before the commission. The timeline is unclear, but she said Indiana rule-making typically takes 10 to 12 months.

State Rep. Ryan Dvorak, who sponsored legislation last session calling for a net metering overhaul, said a draft rule is progress "but there's some room for improvement."

Dvorak, D-South Bend, said he would prefer the state had no power cap for renewable systems. He said any such limit would only end up excluding customers with systems that generate more power than the cap level.

For example, he said the city of South Bend's planned 2 megawatt hydroelectric dam on the St. Joseph River would not be eligible for net metering under the proposed changes.

"When you draw these arbitrary caps, you're going to cut some people out when the goal behind this is to develop the industry and allow everybody in," Dvorak said.

The Indiana Energy Association, which represents Indiana's largest power companies, still is getting feedback from its electric utility members to assess their position on the proposed changes, said Ed Simcox, the group's chief executive officer.

He said the association is analyzing the "technical ramifications" of the proposed 1 megawatt cap to determine what its impact might be on investor-owned electric utilities.

Readying to Hit the Ground Running After Recess, Reid Says RES Alive

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 05, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Energy legislation that would include a renewable electricity standard (RES) “absolutely” remains a possibility for this year, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D), said this week.

The statements, coming as the Senator turned his attention to his annual energy conference in his home state of Nevada next week, were welcomed by the wind energy industry and its advocates, which prior to the August recess reached a far different conclusion from Reid about the ability of an RES to pass. Reid contended that an RES does not have the necessary 60 votes to avoid a filibuster, but wind energy advocates insisted that it does.

However, any gap between vote tallies appears to be narrowing. In his comments to reporters this week, Reid said two Republicans have expressed interest in an RES. While Reid did not name those Senators, Sam Brownback (Kan.) is one Republican who has publicly endorsed a 15% RES in recent weeks.

In a statement in early August, American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) CEO Denise Bode said, “There is tremendous bipartisan support for the renewable electricity standard, and we’re encouraged that Senate leadership is open to revisiting the bill in September. In recent days several Senators, including Republicans, made strong arguments for new policy to bring stability and continued growth to the American wind energy industry. That should come as no surprise. The RES has the greatest job-creation and job-protection potential of any energy policy Congress can consider this year. We are advancing our discussions with RES supporters in both parties to keep our industry competitive and to build a thriving clean energy manufacturing industry.”

This week, AWEA issued the following statement from Bode in response to Reid voicing confidence on the Senate energy bill:

“Today’s statement by Senator Reid that he sees more bipartisan support for a renewable electricity standard is a sure sign energy legislation is still very much in play. A recent Op-Ed by Senator Mark Udall and letter signed by labor, leading utilities, renewable energy trade associations, and most of the environmental community shows momentum is building throughout the nation. There is every reason the Senate can pass energy legislation with an RES.”

Congress returns to Washington, D.C., on September 13, but its working days are fewer this fall because of the election year.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG