New Indiana Solar PV Manufacturer Clears Another Hurdle; Production to start in 2011 in Columbus, IN

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   December 08, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Editor's Note: NuSUN, Inc.  is a member of Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates (IDEA). IDEA extends a big CONGRATULATIONS to Ryan Stout and his newest renewable energy venture. Laura Ann Arnold

The Republic - Solar panel maker to bring 240 jobs. This is the link to the newspaper story in the Columbus, Indiana newspaper, The Republic.

COLUMBUS — A solar panel maker plans to create 240 jobs in Columbus and invest $8.9 million to bring manufacturing operations to an existing facility in Woodside South Industrial Park.

NuSun Inc., based in Yorktown, near Muncie, also plans to move its headquarters to Columbus, said founder and chief executive officer Ryan Stout.

City officials said that some grants have yet to be obtained and some agreements yet to be reached before the startup company can move into the industrial park.

----------------------------------------------

The Columbus City Council adopted a resolution during its council meeting 12/7/2010 to submit an application to the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs to provide financial support for the new manufacturing venture.

A fact sheet from the company states:

NUSUN, Inc. to be headquartered in Columbus, Indiana is a manufacturing company that will build and assemble "Made in USA" next generation nano coated crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels for the United States and International markets.

The company was incorporated in 2009 to serve as the manufacturing arm for Greenworks Energy, an established renewable energy products distribution, installation and renewable energy education company. NUSUN is currently owned and operated by Founder, Ryan Stout, who along with other company officers have over 40 years of experience reselling, installing and distributing within the energy industry.

Recognizing the demand for US manufactured solar panels through a supportive political and business climate combined with the unpredictable nature of product quality and supply chain from Asia, NUSUN has positioned itself to be a leading manufacturer of low-cost, high quality photovoltaic panels.

The NUSUN facility plans to start producing 25 MW of solar panels from the Columbus, IN, location. The company has already built relationships with established OEM cell suppliers in Asia and Europe to purchase the solar cells at attractive pricing through predictable long-term supply contracts. Furthermore, NUSUN is also working with high technology American tool suppliers such as Heliux Technology Inc. based in Santa Clara, CA, to provide them with a semi-automated turnkey production line to build low cost, high yield solar panels in the US.

NUSUN will purchase a manufacturing facility that is located at Woodside South Industrial Complex in Columbus, IN. It is a 12,500 sq ft facility with upgrades to be performed to increase it to a 16k-20k sq ft clean manufacturing environment to enable housing and operation of all panel assembly equipment including shipping, receiving and inventory. NUSUN plans for building modifications and construction to be completed by Q1 of 2011. All production equipment to be installed and commissioned by the middle of Q2 of 2011 and plans for commercial production to commence by the end of Q2 of 2011.

For additional information:

Ryan Stout, Founder and CEO

rstout@nusunsolar.com

(317) 826-0000

Distributing Renewable Energy | RenewablesBiz

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   December 02, 2010  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

A report says distributed wind and solar power will triple its impact in a few years.

via Distributing Renewable Energy | RenewablesBiz.

A new report sees wider expansion of small wind and solar production

Large-scale power generating stations my rule the United States utility model, but a new report suggest distributed wind and solar will play an increasing role worldwide. The Pike Research report suggests the sector will triple in size over the next five years.

Large-scale power generation is the prevailing model for the U.S. utility industry, but distributed renewables is a market that is growing very rapidly. That's according to a new study that tracks the growth in distributed solar and wind generation.

The global electric power industry is evolving from a financial and engineering model that relies on large centralized power plants owned by the utilities to one that is more diverse - both in sources of generation and ownership of the generation assets.

According to a new report from Pike Research [3], the renewable distributed energy generation (RDEG) market will experience strong growth over the next several years, with total system revenues increasing from $50.8 billion in 2009 to $154.7 billion by 2015.

RDEG includes both distributed solar photovoltaics [4] (PV) and small wind power and is an alternative to the traditional centralized power generation plants. During this period, the cleantech market intelligence firm forecasts that annual RDEG capacity additions will increase from 5.9 gigawatts in 2009 to 15.1 gigawatts in 2015.

"The economics of sub-utility scale renewable energy continue to improve at a rapid pace," says senior analyst Peter Asmus. "This downward price curve is fueling demand for distributed solar PV and small wind systems as an alternative to centralized power generation. But the transition to a more distributed system is no small matter, and it requires the evolution of policies, technologies, and business models."

RDEG currently represents a tiny part of the global electric power generation capacity - 0.2 percent. Although Europe and the United States are the largest markets for RDEG today, China and India are huge potential markets. Pike Research anticipates that Europe will continue to be the largest market for RDEG during the 2010-2015 forecast period, but China will see the largest market growth as the cost of renewable energy approaches that of conventional energy.

Currently, the key drivers of the market for distributed solar PV and small wind technologies [5] are public price supports in the form of feed-in tariffs and tax rebates. This dependence on price supports makes the market for RDEG vulnerable to abrupt changes in both political/regulatory policy and economic conditions. Some of largest markets for rooftop solar PV including Spain, Italy, Greece and the state of California, have spiraling national (and state) deficits that could negatively impact this market, the report says.

Pike Research's report, "Renewable Distributed Energy Generation", analyzes the market potential for RDEG technologies including distributed solar PV and small wind power. It examines policy and regulatory factors in key markets around the world, market-based demand drivers and key barriers to adoption, and the competitive landscape within the two major RDEG sectors. Global forecasts, segmented by key countries and world regions, are provided for installed capacity and total system revenues through 2015.

The editorial staff at RenewablesBiz.com is passionate about exchanging ideas and dedicated to promoting ongoing conversation about renewables and sustainable energy issues. We invite you to join and contribute to our online community. If you have an idea for an article or editorial contribution, please contact me via email, bopalka@energycentral.com [6], or phone, 860.633.0090

Editor's Note: Thought you might like to see the one comment posted thus far on the original article posted above. Your thoughts and comments please! Laura Ann Arnold

Distributed Generation - Yes, Wind/Solar - Maybe

 - Dec 2, 2010 - 9:21 AM

The article is interesting as it points out the value of Distributed Generation (DG). But, its focus on wind and solar is perplexing. Why limit it to these two energy sources? In fact, there are much better options for DG.

Rudd Asset Management is a renewable electric power developer. We focus on biomass fueled generation in the 10 - 20 MWe range. We much prefer biomass generation for a number of reasons including load dispatchability, base load operation, and the ability to locate our plants anywhere there is an indigenous biomass fuel source. Another big plus for us is the ability to add Combined Heat and Power to our designs. We can get our plant efficiency to 80 % +. That is not possible with wind and difficult for solar collection.

DG yes. Solar/Wind no!

Mark Rudd

ruddassetmangement@gmail.com

Indianapolis Star Editorial: Compromised by business as usual

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 30, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 http://www.indystar.com/article/20101130/OPINION08/11300305/1291/OPINION08/Compromised-by-business-as-usual

IURC and Duke Energy Ethics Scandal Continues...

Editor's Note: What amazes me is this is what they put in writing in emails.  What else did they discuss and did not leave a "paper trail"? Is this still just the tip of the iceburg? What are your thoughts? Laura Ann Arnold

5:17 PM, Nov 29, 2010  

They discussed luxury cars, vacations, Butler University basketball, Monty Python and family matters.

 Close pals in prestigious careers, David Lott Hardy and James L. Turner had lots of mutual interests to e-mail about.

Including the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, chaired by Hardy, which was considering an application for a $2.9 billion project by Duke Energy Corp., of which Turner was second in command.

Three months after the IURC and the State Ethics Commission ruled out conflict of interest in the Duke episode, a new batch of e-mails obtained by The Star adds to the embarrassment that has ensued from that since-discredited finding.

May we hope the shame has reached a point of no return to business as usual?

Last month, The Star turned up e-mails between Scott Storms and Duke from the time Storms was general counsel to the IURC and was seeking a job with Duke. Laced with joking references to the ethics commission, the messages made clear Storms was not "walled off" from Duke's coal-gasification case while at the IURC, as the ethics panel and Hardy had said.

After a re-investigation, prodded by the news media and consumer watchdogs, Gov. Mitch Daniels fired Hardy as IURC chairman and Duke fired the newly hired Storms along with its Indiana president, Michael Reed.

Still, the revelations of cozy personal connections between Duke and the IURC, which is supposed to safeguard the interests of Duke's customers, pour forth.

In addition to chitchat about sports and shopping, the Hardy-Turner e-mails included IURC internal matters. Work figured in their friendship, after all; Hardy used to be a lawyer for Duke's predecessor company and Turner is a former state utility consumer counselor. The question is: Has their friendship violated professional standards -- and perhaps the law?

The FBI, as well as the Daniels administration, is looking into this and other relationships. Among other possibilities, the validity of the Edwardsport coal-gasification plant, already far along with $2 billion invested, hangs in the balance.

Beyond the immediate mess, there is the larger issue of IURC neutrality. The commission traditionally has been compromised by the revolving door between it and those it regulates. Without systemic changes in how it operates, and how members are appointed, scandal will remain a constant threat. Perhaps the blatancy of the latest disclosures will prod the governor and lawmakers to take corrective action. Certainly, the public deserves better than having to eavesdrop on its own affairs.

New rate structure creates sticker shock for REMC customers

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 30, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   5 Comments
Herald-Times (Bloomington, IN) - Sunday, November 28, 2010
Author: Laura Lane, Herald-Times, Bloomington, Ind.
Nov. 28--Shelley Brim knew her electric rate was set to increase. But when the $507 June bill arrived, she unplugged night lights, unused televisions, cell phone chargers and an above-ground pool pump. She asked her husband to erect a clothes line behind their mobile home on Sadie Lane to dry laundry the old-fashioned way.

Her electric bill from the Bloomfield-based Utilities District of Western Indiana REMC the previous month, before the rate hike kicked in, was $234.

The Brim family could not afford to pay more than double what they had expected.

"Everywhere you go, the REMC bill is a topic of discussion," said Brim, secretary at Avoca Baptist Church in Lawrence County. "We are constantly receiving calls for help with electric bills. How are these people going to make it?"

She heard of one family that moved out to their camper and used a generator during the peak summer months to cut out the cost of air conditioning their house.

In March, Kim Holt bought the family business, Holt's Cafe in Judah, from her parents. She took over paying the bills, and was shocked when the June REMC bill was more than double what it had been the month before.

"It was really hard to make it through the summer because I had not expected it to go up like that. I guess I wasn't paying close enough attention," she said. "We had to let some things go to pay that, and then, when the rate went down this fall, I tried to catch up."

She said electric bills often are the talk of the restaurant these days. "And at the fair this summer, everybody was talking about it. The farmers and the older people, they get really upset," she said.

It's been suggested she could raise her meal prices to help pay the electric bill. "But I just can't do that, because my customers are facing the same increases I am, and they might stop coming if I charge more."

Why the increases?

There is a valid reason behind the rate increase and billing changes affecting UDWI REMC customers, who now pay more per kilowatt hour (kWh) during the three hottest and three coldest months of the year, when they consume more power to keep cool, then stay warm.

During more temperate months, when customers consume less, the rate dips way down, from 13.6 cents per kWh to 7.3 cents.

Here's why: Like the 17 other electric cooperatives that purchase their electric power in bulk from Bloomington-based Hoosier Energy, UDWI pays for it as the company is billed. Hoosier Energy's new rate structure charges more for power during peak-use times, and less for energy consumed when demand is lower.

That's because Hoosier Energy pays more for electricity during peaks and passes the cost along to its REMC consumers. During low-use times, those costs are greatly reduced.

Brian Sparks, chief executive officer for UDWI REMC, said he had to change the rate structure to be in line with the bills he receives from Hoosier Energy. Electric cooperatives do not have huge sums of money on hand to pay in advance, Sparks said. Instead, his REMC is customer-owned, not a private corporation or utility.

Over time, Sparks said, consumers' high and low electric bills balance out, although REMC officials admit the new rates will result in users paying about 5 percent more during the course of a year. "The biggest increase I have seen, figuring over a year, was 9 percent," Sparks said.

"We do realize it has hit people hard, especially with the economy the way it is. But this is how we are billed, and we have to balance our cash flow," he explained. "The increase to customers is revenue neutral for us. We don't make more money charging these rates. It pays for the power as we are billed for it."

Customers have known the billing changes were coming for several years, Sparks said. As the time grew near, he held eight meetings around the 11-county district, serving a meal and explaining how the new system worked. He addressed the upcoming change in the REMC newsletter each customer received. And it was a topic at the cooperative's annual meeting in April, held at Bloomfield High School and attended by 600 people.

"Yes, we were aware, but I guess everybody just didn't realize how much it would be. It did not kick in that it would be this bad," Brim said. "Then we had a really hot summer, so it was even worse."

First a drop, then a panic

Struggling families and people on fixed incomes most often receive the same amount of income every month and count on bills to remain somewhat steady. So when UDWI REMC customers such as William and Shelley Brim saw their bill increase from one month to the next by 117 percent, panic set in.

This past spring, the Brims and 19,000 or so other households and businesses benefited from a low rate UDWI REMC's board of directors initiated in April. The kWh cost was slashed to just 7.3 cents, a rate not seen for 15 years. Before that, UDWI REMC members paid a straight rate of 10.3 cents per kWh all year long.

No one complained about the low bills when the rate went down three cents.

Then came June, and the kWh rate jumped to 13.6 cents for the next three months. It was a hot summer, so increased air conditioning use plus the higher rate combined to create quite a shock for customers when they received their summer electric bills.

Many complained. Loudly.

"We heard from people, of course. It is a big change," Sparks said. "An increase like this is not something that is common in this area."

Brim, the church secretary, often fields requests from church members needing help paying utility bills. Those inquiries soared. More than 1,000 customers signed petitions "to voice our concern and confirm the hardship that this has placed on individuals in this community."

Citizens were up in arms over the summer, although the clamor died down when the 7.3-cent rate returned for the temperate fall months of September, October and November.

But come Wednesday, UDWI REMC customer's rates will jump back up to 13.7 cents per kWh. They will remain at that rate until March 1.

In a letter to news organizations asking that someone look into the rate structure, Brim outlined her concerns.

"It doesn't seem right," she wrote. "What about the many that get laid off in the winter months? What about the people that are struggling and now are hit with this? What about people on budgets or Social Security? And the elderly, who have to choose air or heat over their medications?"

Brim is not one to stir things up. But she had to do something on behalf of the REMC customers she kept hearing from. She wrote a letter and prepared a petition. "Somehow, I have ended up being the voice behind it all," she said.

The evening of Nov. 4, Sparks and two UDWI REMC board of directors met with the Brims at Gulletts Creek Baptist Church, where William Brim is the minister. "They explained why the increases happened and said this is what had to happen to keep from building more power plants and that Hoosier Energy's increases and government regulations were behind it. They talked about something called 'cap and trade,'" Shelley Brim said.

Then they asked her why she had not said much during the presentation. "I said all of that was just fine, but it would not do anything to help people who could not afford it."

The men told her about REMC's budget plan. The power company determines how much power a household likely will consume, based on past usage, then divides that amount into 12 payments.

"For now, our bill will be $315 a month," Brim said. "It would have been just $173 for October because of the lower rate, but of course it's more on the budget because it tries to even it out." She's hoping for no more $500 REMC bills.

After the meeting, Sparks sent someone to the couple's mobile home to check the insulation, windows and doors to make sure the home was sound in that regard.

"The guy said everything was fine as far as efficiency goes," Brim said.

Sparks said consumers of electricity must realize costs will continue to increase. The way to save money is to cut back usage, and high rates during peak times should encourage people to do that.

"It's hard to think about saving money and cutting back on something you never see," Sparks said.

Other customers already affected

UDWI REMC customers are not the first, or the last, to face new rate structures for electricity. South Central Indiana REMC, based in Martinsville, is ready to launch new time-of-use residential rates that will be higher during peak times.

But they haven't implemented the system yet, realizing the cooperative's 39,000 members -- many in Morgan, Monroe, Brown and Owen counties -- have not been educated in the merits of the rate change and the reasons behind it.

SCI REMC's new structure has a flat 7.5-cent-per-kWh rate during March, April, May, September, October and November. During June, July and August, though, the rate jumps to 20.17 cents during peak times, which are noon to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday. The rest of the time, the rate goes down to 7.5 cents.

And during the frigid months of December, January and February, the peak rate -- from 7 to 10 a.m. and from 6 to 9 p.m. weekdays -- is 21.97 cents. Again, it goes down to 7.5 all other times.

CEO Kevin Sump acknowledged the rate structure is complicated. But since it reflects the rates Hoosier Energy charges SCI REMC, it makes sense.

He tried the new time of use system on his own home, without changing his usage pattern, and said he would have saved $102 over a year because he and his wife are not home to use power during the day. Making a change like moving laundry to weekends could make a big difference under such a plan, he said.

Consumers of electricity can direct their usage to less-expensive times and save money for themselves and energy for the environment. And both REMCs soon will offer equipment that can ramp down a household's usage during peak times by activating a switch to turn off an air conditioner's compressor, for instance, or shut down a water heater for a period of time.

"This kind of change results in reducing usage as people become more aware of the reality of the costs of electricity and how it is charged," Sump said. "They physically reduce usage and move it to less expensive times. We need to influence consumer usage patterns away from peak times. Because the only environmentally friendly kilowatt hour is the one we do not produce."

Energy use
Average residential electricity consumption UDWI REMC customers, 2009:
13,776 kWh annually, average of 1,148 kWh per month
Source: UDWI REMC

Average electricity consumption for U.S. residential customers, 2008 (most recent year available):
11,040 kWh annually, average of 920 kWh per month

BY STATE
Highest electricity-consuming state: Tennessee (15,624 kWh annual avg.)
Lowest electricity-consuming state: Maine (6,252 kWh annual avg.)
 

Where it goes
Greatest U.S. electricity consumption, by source:
1. Cooling
2. Lighting
3. Water heating
4. Heating
5. Refrigeration
6. Televisions
7. Clothes dryers
8. Computers
9. Cooking appliances
10. Dishwashers
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

Copyright (c) 2010, Herald-Times, Bloomington, Ind.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

States Diverting Money From Climate Initiative

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 29, 2010  /   Posted in Emissions Trading/Cap and Trade  /   No Comments

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/nyregion/29greenhouse.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper
 
November 28, 2010
By MIREYA NAVARRO
 
In New York, government officials found $90 million to pay for schools by dipping into money generated by a multistate greenhouse gas initiative.
 
In New Hampshire, the state took $3.1 million from a similar environmental fund. And in New Jersey, the government diverted its whole share: $65 million.
 
At least three financially troubled states have discovered in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a cap-and-trade system, a convenient pool of money that can be drawn on to help balance state budgets.
 
In just over two years, the initiative, known as RGGI, has generated more than $729 million for the 10 states that have participated. Each state is supposed to use its share of the money raised to invest in renewable energy and to promote energy efficiency and consumer benefits, like programs that help low-income electricity customers pay their utility bills.
 
But the money is proving too much of a temptation for states not to use in other ways.
 
Critics say that diverting money from the fund for general spending, instead of using it on emissions control and energy savings, makes the initiative little more than a hidden tax on electricity.
 
Already, RGGI opponents in New Jersey have sponsored a bill to end the state’s participation.
 
“This is nothing but a new form of taxation, and environmentalists have been used,” said Steve Lonegan, New Jersey state director for Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group founded and largely financed by oil industry interests.
 
Under RGGI, which is pronounced Reggie, 10 Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states agreed to cap carbon dioxide emissions from electric power plants and charge the plants for the emissions they produce. As an incentive for power plants to pollute less, the states allow the plants that cut their emissions below the cap to sell or trade their excess carbon allowances through online auctions four times a year.
 
The agreement binds the states to spend at least 25 percent of the money on direct consumer benefits or “strategic” energy purposes.
 
The participating states have agreed to devote virtually all their RGGI money to energy-use reduction. Administrators of the system say that, even with the diversion of money by state governments, about 80 percent of the proceeds for carbon credit auctions still goes to such programs.
 
Some environmentalists who support the multistate pact agree that without the investment in programs that cut energy use and create green jobs, the initiative’s potential economic benefit becomes an expense.
 
“There’s a direct consequence for taking this money,” said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey chapter of the Sierra Club. “Families are going to pay higher energy bills this winter if they didn’t weatherize their homes.”
 
At the national level, efforts by Democratic leaders and the Obama administration to include a cap-and-trade scheme as part of a national energy policy were contested in Congress, with opponents branding it “cap-and-tax” and Tea Party followers singling it out as a symbol of what was wrong with Washington. But the controversy over cap-and-trade has percolated down to the states, where it became fodder for some candidates in the midterm elections and sparked anti-RGGI rallies in New York and New Jersey, organized by Americans for Prosperity.
 
“We don’t need this when the federal government didn’t go forward with a national plan,” said Alison Littell McHose, a Republican assemblywoman in New Jersey who sponsored the bill to get that state out of the initiative.
 
Some opponents said they feared that the multistate system would encourage cap-and-trade to spread. “The other states are watching this program to see if they can get away with it,” Mr. Lonegan said.
 
Two agreements similar to RGGI — the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord, with six states and one Canadian province, and the Western Climate Initiative, with seven states and four Canadian provinces — envision their own cap-and-trade systems. The regional groups have their own rules and features, but the 23 states in them have discussed linking efforts.
 
The regional carbon-trading market among the states has been free of speculation, administrators for the initiative say, and so far most carbon credits have been purchased by power suppliers. The main criticism from environmental groups is that the cap on emissions is too lax — in fact, power suppliers have easily met their caps, and carbon credits are trading at bottom-level prices, because plants are taking advantage of cheap prices for natural gas, which pollutes less than fuel sources like coal.
 
But with the renewed opposition, “now we’re going to be fighting to save RGGI,” Mr. Tittel of the Sierra Club said, rather than focusing on strengthening and expanding the program.
 
Gov. David A. Paterson of New York set the precedent last year when he took $90 million from the money generated by the initiative to deal with a projected state budget deficit of nearly $50 billion through March 2013. New York has so far collected $265 million from RGGI, the most of any of the participating states.
 
Peter Iwanowicz, the governor’s environmental adviser and acting commissioner of the State Department of Environmental Conservation, called the action “a one-time deal.”
 
“New York was facing historic deficits,” he said. “It wasn’t a decision that was made lightly.”
 
In New York, much of the money in the fund has gone to investments in alternative energy technologies, training for green jobs, and energy efficiency programs like subsidized energy audits for homes and other buildings. The energy initiative has added 72 cents to the monthly electricity bill of New Yorkers, Mr. Iwanowicz said, but he noted that because of reductions in energy use and cheaper fuel prices in the last two years, customers might not have seen a rise.
 
In New Jersey, Gov. Chris Christie said that the state would use its $65.2 million in RGGI money to help offset a $10.7 billion budget deficit for fiscal year 2011. Mr. Christie has yet to add his voice to calls among fellow Republicans to withdraw from the cap-and-trade regional group. Still, some experts note that the availability of RGGI money to help states deal with their economic woes may be the very thing that saves the initiative and similar accords.
 
“The states are so broke that it’s going to be unbelievably difficult for them to stop this program,” said Leigh Raymond, the associate director of the Climate Change Research Center at Purdue University. “They’re desperate for money.”

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG