Indiana stands to benefit from future wind development

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 02, 2011  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   1 Comments

By Zach Ammerman | Indiana Daily Student (IDS)
POSTED AT 05:38 PM ON Jun. 1, 2011

Indiana ranks among the states with the highest potential wind power capacity, and any future development of wind energy could boost the state economy, according to an article from the Indiana Business Research Center (IBRC).

U.S. wind energy capacity has grown at an average rate of 22 percent per year during the past five years, according to the article. Much of that growth has come from the Midwest. Until 2008, Indiana had made few developments in wind energy; but after 2008, Indiana jumped to fourth in the Midwest in the amount of energy generated by
wind power.

However, Indiana still has a long way to go to catch up with other states..

Indiana has an installed wind capacity of approximately 1 gigawatt, while Texas, the state with the highest installed capacity, is at about 9.5 gigawatts.

Indiana has a potential capacity of more than 400 gigawatts — more than enough to provide all of the electricity in the state — according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, which compiles data about renewable energy. 

One of the biggest benefits of developing wind power in Indiana is its potential economic impact on the state.

While most wind turbines are currently owned and manufactured in Europe (all of the four windmill farms in Indiana are owned by European firms), Indiana’s manufacturing sector will likely benefit from any increase in wind energy production.

There are several small firms located in Indiana that manufacture parts used in wind turbines, including Vela Gear Systems located in Carmel, Ind.

Vela Gear Systems, however, is projecting rapid expansion in the next three years, according to the  article from the IBRC.

Because of Indiana’s huge untapped wind energy potential and rising concerns about the environmental impact of greenhouse gas emissions, many small firms like Vela Gera Systems could also see rapid growth in the near future.

A new project for a wind farm in northwestern-central Indiana will create about 100 to 150 construction jobs and a smaller number of permanent positions after the project is completed.

E.ON Climate and Renewables, a North American subsidiary of a European based company, is financing the project, which will have an overall investment of $175 to $200 million, said Matt Tulis, Communications Manager for the company.

The project will have approximately 100 turbines that will create enough energy to power 60,000 homes, Tulis said.

He also said the company does not yet know where most of the manufacturing for the farm will take place; but if any Indiana firms get even part of the job, it will have a positive impact on Indiana’s economy.

ndiana could see an uptick in new long-term jobs linked to the wind industry, said Ryan Krause, an economic research assistant for the Indiana Business Research Center.

Most of these long-term jobs would involve manufacturing the various parts that go into turbines, like gears, which many companies in Indiana “are already very adept at,” Krause said.

But the bigger turbine parts, like the blades and the tower, are unlikely to come from Indiana in the near future, Krause said. Most of these parts are imported by companies overseas that specialize in manufacturing them.

Because the cost is so high to import such massive components, there is a possibility that if Indiana continues its trend of constructing new wind farms these parts might eventually be manufactured in Indiana, Krause suggested.

WSJ: Germany to Forsake Its Nuclear Reactors; How will it affect renewable energy policy such as their feed-in tariff?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 01, 2011  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Original article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303657404576354752218810560.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsThird I'm not sure how long this link will work so don't dawdle to check out the original article with additional links, etc.

Editor's Note: There is already a follow-up to this story in the Wednesday, June 1, 2011, Wall Street Journal entitled, "German Nuclear Operator Threatens Suit Over Ban". To me the significance of this new development in Germany is less about the political decision to abandon nuclear power and more about how Germany plans to make up the 22.6% of its energy supply it currently receives from nuclear power from the renewable energy sector.  It will be very interesting to see how this change in energy policy will affect recent changes in Germany's feed-in tariff. Laura Ann Arnold

 

By PATRICK MCGROARTY And VANESSA FUHRMANS

[GERNUKEjp] AFP/Getty ImagesGerman Chancellor Angela Merkel, center, received Monday a report on safe energy supply from the newly formed so-called Ethics Commission in Berlin.

BERLIN—Germany on Monday said it would close all of its 17 nuclear reactors by 2022, a sharp policy reversal that will make it the first major economy to quit atomic power in the wake of the nuclear crisis in Japan.

WSJ's Patrick McGroarty reports German Chancellor Angela Merkel's decision to close all nuclear power plants by 2022 in response to the nuclear disaster in Japan following March's tsunami. Photo: THOMAS KIENZLE/AFP/Getty Images

German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced that she plans to follow a government-appointed commission's recommendation to shut eight of the country's reactors immediately and close most of the others by 2021. Three plants may be kept online into 2022 as a source of reserve power, she added.

[GERNUKE]

Journal Community

 "After what was, for me anyway, an unimaginable disaster in Fukushima, we have had to reconsider the role of nuclear energy," Ms. Merkel said, announcing the decision at a news conference with several of her cabinet ministers.

"This path sets out a great challenge for Germany," she added, but "we can be the first industrial country to make the transition into an age of highly efficient and renewable energy."

Germany's move—marking a contrast with the U.S. and other countries that have largely stuck to plans to continue pursuing nuclear power—is a U-turn from a contentious plan that Ms. Merkel engineered just last fall that would have extended the lifetimes of some of Germany's reactors into the 2030s, more than a decade longer than previously scheduled. Ms. Merkel's latest move is effectively a return to an agreement to phase out nuclear power approved in 2002 by a center-left Social Democrat-Green coalition.

It's unclear whether a formal ban on nuclear-energy imports will be a part of the final law, but Ms. Merkel has said that it would be senseless to scuttle Germany's nuclear industry only to import electricity produced by reactors in neighboring countries.

FMK / DemotixProtesters holding antinuclear banners marched through the streets of Hamburg on Saturday.

gernuke0530

gernuke0530

Just days after the first explosion at Japan's tsunami-stricken Fukushima Daiichi plant in March, Ms. Merkel shut down seven of Germany's oldest reactors and ordered a review of its nuclear strategy. Germany's youngest nuclear-power plant, the Neckarweistheim II reactor north of Stuttgart, went online in 1989. The government's decision Monday, based on the outcome of that review, marks the most dramatic shift yet in a nation's nuclear-energy policy in reaction to the Japanese crisis. Switzerland's government also has approved a plan to decommission its nuclear plants. Under the Swiss plan, however, the nuclear phase-out may not be completed until well after 2030.

But apart from Japan, which has quit plans to build more reactors, few countries have altered long-term nuclear energy policies. Many, instead, are still examining how or whether to proceed with plans for new reactors. More than 150 are planned world-wide, in addition to the 64 under construction, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. China, Taiwan and Italy have suspended plans for new reactors, pending safety reviews, while the U.S. and the U.K. have also conducted reviews.

On Monday, the Obama Administration repeated that the U.S. intends to push ahead with efforts to revive the U.S. nuclear-power industry while learning lessons from the accident in Japan. "The administration is committed to increasing our nation's clean energy share through a broad range of energy sources," White House spokesman Clark Stevens said. President Barack Obama, whose home state of Illinois relies on nuclear power for nearly half its electricity, has long supported expanding nuclear energy as part of an effort to increase power sources that emit little or no carbon dioxide.

Since the Japan accident, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees civilian uses of nuclear power in the U.S., has been conducting special investigations of nuclear reactors. The chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Gregory Jaczko, has expressed confidence in the safety of U.S. nuclear reactors, but recently threw the industry a curve by saying there are "technical issues" with a new type of reactor some U.S. operators are using for their next-generation nuclear plants.

German officials decided late Sunday night to close all nuclear power plants by 2022. Video courtesy of Reuters and photo courtesy of AP.

Germany's largest neighbor, France—where nuclear energy makes up three-quarters of the electricity mix—said Ms. Merkel's move wouldn't sway its nuclear policy. "I respect the choice that Germany made," French Prime Minister François Fillon said in Strasbourg on Monday, but "it's not the choice that we are making—we think that nuclear energy is a solution for the future."

 In few countries is nuclear energy the hot-button issue it is in Germany, where polls show some 70% of the populace opposes it, the legacy of a broad-based antinuclear movement that harks back to the 1986 Chernobyl accident. Since the Fukushima accident, antinuclear protests have taken place across the country.

Ms. Merkel's change in course, though, hasn't produced the desired political effect. Conservative allies have been frustrated by her turn away from a cherished policy victory, and nuclear opponents have seen the move as opportunistic. Those perceptions contributed to several stinging regional election losses for the Christian Democratic Union this spring, and have led to a surge in clout for the opposition Green Party.

The center-left Social Democrats said Monday they would approve the government's new plan in parliament only if a stronger commitment is made to build up wind and solar capacity, and if the legislation leaves open the possibility of closing all nuclear plants sooner than 2022.

German industry leaders, while not surprised by the announcement, lashed out at what some called a politically driven decision that would increase energy prices and threaten German competitiveness.

"The clearly political intent to fix a final and irreversible end-date for German nuclear energy with such unprecedented haste gives me increasing worry," Hans-Peter Keitel, head of Germany's BDI business lobby, wrote in an open letter to German business leaders Monday.

Dieter Zetsche, chief executive of Germany luxury car maker Daimler AG, aired qualms about Germany's shift in nuclear policy. "People expect orientation, and with that in mind, too many changes in direction are to be viewed critically," Mr. Zetsche said in an interview in the German tabloid Bild-Zeitung. Mr. Zetsche added that the huge power requirements of Germany's heavy manufacturing companies—a pillar of its economy—need to be considered alongside the concerns raised by the Fukushima disaster.

Germany's electricity prices, which have more than doubled in the past decade, are a sensitive issue for industry, whose domestic sites consume nearly 50% of the country's electricity.

Currently, Germany derives 42.4% of its energy supply from coal-fired plants, but phasing out nuclear power, which now makes up nearly 23% of the country's energy supply, could force it to rely more on coal. The big variable is the cost of natural gas, the preferred, cleaner alterative. But procuring cheaper gas from other countries is complicated, in part because long-term contracts that many German utilities have signed with Russia lock them into a price tied to the price of oil.

On Monday, Ms. Merkel said the new nuclear policy wouldn't affect Germany's renewable energy targets, which call for generating 80% of Germany's energy supply from sources such as wind and solar, by 2050. Renewable energy capacity currently makes up about 16.9% of Germany's electricity consumption.

The move boosted stocks of German renewable energy companies. SolarWorld AG and solar-cell maker Q-Cells SE jumped more than 8%, while wind turbine maker Nordex SE rose 13%.

Shares in German utilities E.ON and RWE AG, which operate most of Germany's 17 nuclear reactors, fell sharply Monday on news of the plan. Though the utilities will no longer reap the potential profits of operating their nuclear plants longer, the government said they will still be subject to a new tax on nuclear-fuel rods introduced this year to offset those potential gains.

—Max Colchester, Jan Hromadko, Rebecca Smith, Stephen Power and Gary Fields contributed to this article.Write to Patrick McGroarty at patrick.mcgroarty@dowjones.com and Jan Hromadko at jan.hromadko@dowjones.com

IURC Approves Final Net Metering Rule

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 11, 2011  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

I received this message this afternoon following the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) weekly conference today (5/11/2011).

Dear Interested Parties,
 
Thank you for your participating in the administrative rulemaking for net metering.  This afternoon, the Commission approved the attached Final Rule.  The rule will now be circulated through the State process for full approval.  Because of statutory timelines, we estimate this process will take between three to four months to complete. I will email again when the rule is fully promulgated and becomes law.  Several people have asked what changes took place between the Proposed Rule and the Final Rule.  Please see the “Changes” document for a list of those changes.  Please let me know if you have any questions about the rulemaking process or have problems opening the attachment.
 
DeAnna L. Poon
Assistant General Counsel
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

Here is a description of the changes. Changes from Proposed Rule to Final Rule[1]

Here is a copy of the final rule approved today. LSA No 10-662 Final Rule[1]

IURC Weekly Conference Agenda 5/11/2011 Lists Final Net Metering Rule

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 11, 2011  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) weekly conference agenda for Wednesday, May 11, 2011 at 2:00 pm lists RM#09-10 which is the new net metering rule. The agenda indicates that the new rule--if approved--will become effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher. I assume this notation refers to publication in the Indiana Register.

It looks like our long and hard fought battle to update Indiana's net metering rule is coming to an end. Although there have been several unsuccessful attempts to revise these net metering regulations, the Commission initiated a series of public hearings, technical conference and one-on-one sessions with all the stakeholders including Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates (IDEA).

Watch for more details here after the Commission's weekly conference meeting this afternoon!

Italy changes solar FITs

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 09, 2011  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Editor's Note: This article from Craig Morris is a follow-up on an earlier post entitled, Abound Solar Wants Italian Sun; Will Italian Government Extention of Current Feed-in Tariff Impact Indiana? Craig Morris and I are both members of the Alliance for Renewable Energy Steering Committee. Last week during our monthly telephone conference call I asked if anyone knew the outcome of this pending decision by the Italian government. Craig Morris obliged with this post on Renewables International. Thanks for the update, Craig! Laura Ann Arnold

Original article: http://www.renewablesinternational.net/italy-changes-solar-fits/150/510/30890/ 

The changes were both highly anticipated and long in coming, but last Thursday [05/05/2011] the Council of Ministers adopted a new decree for photovoltaics. The reductions are yet another success story for feed-in tariffs, whose purpose has always been twofold: the widespread deployment of renewables, and bringing down cost.

On Thursday Italian ministers adopted a degree that would cut solar feed-in tariffs by between 22 and 30 percent in 2011, by 23 to 45 percent in 2012, and by 10 to 45 percent in 2013 depending on how much is actually installed. A ceiling has also been imposed depending on system size to prevent speculation: one megawatt on rooftops and 200 kilowatts foreground-mounted systems according to Reuters, which also explains that one goal is to limit the cost of solar feed-in tariffs at 6 to 7 billion euros by the end of 2016, when roughly 23 gigawatts is to have been installed.

According to a report at PV Tech (which includes a chart of specific rates), there is now to be a monthly degression, which could cause a headache for developers, but those who can get their projects completed by August 31 will reportedly still be eligible for the previous tariffs. Interestingly, PV Tech also reports that Italy has come up with a new way of approaching the "domestic content" issue: a five percent bonus is paid if 60 percent of the investment cost comes from within the EU – not from within Italy. Finally, PV Tech writes that Conto Energia IV stipulates that grid operators have 30 days to connect completed arrays.

 

Reuters cites a number of firms and investors who are not pleased by the cuts, one of which even plans to sue the Italian government for losses stemming from the changes, but not everyone agrees. For instance, Germany's Photon Magazine argued recently that Italian feed-in tariffs for solar are too high in comparison to Germany, especially in light of the much greater insulation conditions in Italy. The limit on project size will also help ensure that the market is not gobbled up by a small number of large corporate investors. And PV Tech quotes Jeffrey's International, which says that the new feed-in tariffs are "more positive for the solar industry" than its prior estimates.

Italy has become the world's second-largest market for photovoltaics behind Germany, and the goal of 23 gigawatts by 2016 remains ambitious. As Renewables International recently reported, Italy has probably already met its photovoltaics target for 2020 at 8,000 megawatts. In comparison, the United States – which has more than five times as many inhabitants as Italy and per capita power consumption nearly 4 times greater – installed less than 500 megawatts last year. Italy will obviously remain a gigawatt market over the next five years, and to match that performance on a per capita consumption basis, the US would have to install nearly 20 times as much – around 20,000 megawatts per year. In fact, market researchers at Solarbuzz recently estimated that the photovoltaics pipeline has "now soared past 12 gigawatts" – but apparently for the next five years according to the chart in the announcement, not per year.

Solarbuzz says that "the PV industry is facing the effects of large cuts in feed-in tariffs across Europe," but that the Request for Proposal process in the US is making the country "one of the most promising growth markets over the next 24 months." That's true, but a comparison of feed-in tariffs in Germany and Italy with RFPs in the US also clearly shows that the US will have a hard time keeping up with PV growth in Italy and Germany in absolute terms (not to mention per capita consumption). Furthermore, the US seems unable to bring the costs down without feed-in tariffs. Solarbuzz writes that "the largest US projects are now being completed in the range of $3-4 per watt," but that price only makes the largest systems in sunny deserts in the US competitive with systems smaller than 100 kilowatts in cloudy Germany (Renewables International reported).

Although the full text of Conto Energia IV has yet to be published in Italy's Gazette, it has been made available online at the Industry Ministry's website in Italian. The decree becomes law once it is published in the Gazette, and the law is expected to take effect on June 1. (Craig Morris)

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG