Author Archives Laura Arnold

Nevada Legislature Passes Bill to Restore Net Metering for Rooftop Solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 07, 2017  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Nevada Legislature Passes Bill to Restore Net Metering for Rooftop Solar

Nevada Legislature Passes Bill to Restore Net Metering for Rooftop Solar

The legislation is on track to become law, which advocates say will reboot the state’s rooftop solar market. Tesla is already planning to enter.

by Julia Pyper
June 05, 2017

The Nevada State Legislature has passed a bill that's expected to revive the state's ailing rooftop solar market. The Assembly voted to approve a Senate version of the bill late Sunday night, with just a day remaining in the legislative session.

The bill (AB 405) would reinstate net energy metering for residential solar projects, but at a discounted compensation rate.

AB 405 would immediately allow rooftop solar customers to be reimbursed for excess generation from a solar system at 95 percent of the retail electricity rate. Over time, though, customer compensation would decline. The amended bill would create tiers, where credit rates decrease in increments for every 80 megawatts of rooftop solar generation deployed -- to a floor of 75 percent of the retail rate. A previous version of the bill lowered compensation in increments based on peak load.

If signed into law, AB 405 would also allow net-metered customers to lock in their rate for at least 20 years, eliminating the risk that rates could change retroactively. Other consumer protections are also included in the bill, like the requirement for solar companies to offer a 10-year warranty and to provide transparent information as to how they calculate customer savings.

Furthermore, the legislation ensures that net metering will remain the law of the land in the event Nevada voters decide to deregulate the state's electricity market. It also mandates that residential solar and energy storage customers cannot be treated as a separate rate class, which means these customers cannot be hit with higher fees for investing in distributed energy.

Governor Brian Sandoval has 10 days to sign the bill. If signed, the net metering compensation changes would take effect right away, and the consumer protection measures would take effect this fall.

Rooftop solar advocates, including the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), say the bill will reboot Nevada's rooftop solar market, which has been effectively stalled since a 2015 policy change.

"This bill is a compromise that doesn't fully value the benefits of distributed solar," said Sean Gallagher, SEIA's vice president of state affairs, in a statement. "It will, however, allow Nevada consumers and small businesses that may have wanted to go solar, but found it uneconomic under the existing solar policies, to now proceed."

"The legislation also provides important consumer protections, ensuring that solar customers aren't placed in discriminatory rate classes and giving customers 20 years of certainty when they sign up to go solar," he added. "We believe that it will be able to get solar companies back to business in Nevada, creating jobs and investment."

A Tesla spokesperson said the company will begin selling rooftop solar and residential storage products in Nevada as soon as possible, adding,"We look forward to bringing even more jobs to the state in the years ahead to help provide residents with affordable rooftop solar and energy storage choices.”

Changes in the legislation come nearly a year and a half after the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) voted to eliminate retail-rate net metering for new and existing solar customers in December 2015. State regulators originally planned to phase out net metering over four years, but later extended the timeline to 12 years. Amid ongoing public opposition, the PUCN decided to grandfather existing solar customers onto their previous rates, but did not address the market for new solar customers.

Nevada lost more than 2,600 jobs after regulators eliminated net metering in late 2015. Major solar firms pulled out of the state, unable to find a way to make their systems pencil out economically for consumers.

“This is a victory hard won and a testament to the overwhelming support for rooftop solar in Nevada," said Alex McDonough, Sunrun’s vice president of public policy. "Nevadans have made it clear they want the right to generate their own clean energy and they want the good jobs and clean air that go hand in hand with a thriving solar market. [...] We look forward to Governor Sandoval signing AB 405 into law and appreciate his leadership in bringing rooftop solar back to Nevada.”

NV Energy, meanwhile, contends that restoring net metering would be very costly. The utility gave a presentation to the Senate last month that forecast AB 405 would cost more than $63 million each year, or about $1.3 billion over two decades. These calculations were based on a earlier version of the bill, however -- not the bill that passed yesterday. Solar advocates also pointed out that the utility did not account for any of the costs of transmission and distribution for utility-scale solar or the benefits of rooftop solar.

The Nevada State Assembly passed an earlier version of AB 405 in a vote of 38-2 in late May. The Senate version passed Sunday was approved by the Assembly late Sunday night. The bill now heads to the desk of Governor Sandoval, who is likely to sign it. Sandoval put together an energy task force last year that recommended restoring net metering in 2017.

This story was updated on Monday, June 5 to reflect that the bill passed in both the Senate and the Assembly, and to include additional information on the bill. 

Oregon legislature says HOA’s can’t bar rooftop solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 01, 2017  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Legislature says homeowners associations can't bar rooftop solar

Homeowners associations won’t be able to deny Oregonians their right to go solar under a bill that passed the Legislature on Wednesday.

The bill, HB 2111, which sailed through the House more than a month ago on a 56-3 vote, passed the Senate 19-9.

Rep. Mitch Greenlick, a Democrat, was spurred to bring the bill by a constituent in unincorporated Washington County who reported that his homeowners association had flat refused to allow him to put solar panels on his roof.

“I think I started this in the 2013 session, so I’m really pleased that we finally got it done,” Greenlick said.

Gov. Kate Brown’s position on the bill wasn’t immediately known, but Greenlick said he couldn’t see any reason why she wouldn't sign it into law.

The bill was amended to include a provision that does allow a homeowners association to “adopt and enforce a provision that imposes reasonable size, placement or aesthetic requirements” on solar installations.


79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2017 Regular Session
A-Engrossed House Bill 2111
Ordered by the House April 14
Including House Amendments dated April 14
Sponsored by Representative GREENLICK; Representative HELM (at the request of Jerry Weinert)

SUMMARY
The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor’s brief statement of the essential features of the measure.
Prohibits inclusion of provisions prohibiting installation and use of solar panels for obtaining solar access in declaration or bylaws of planned community.
A BILL FOR AN ACT
Relating to solar access for residential real property.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1. Section 2 of this 2017 Act is added to and made a part of ORS 94.550 to 94.783.
SECTION 2. (1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a provision in a
declaration or bylaws of a planned community that prohibits an owner of the roof or other
exterior portion of a building or improvement on which solar panels may be installed from
installing or using solar panels for obtaining solar access, as described in ORS 215.044 and
227.190, is void and unenforceable as a violation of the public policy to protect the public
health, safety and welfare of the people of Oregon.
(2) An owner of record of real property subject to an instrument that contains a provision
described in subsection (1) of this section may file a petition to remove the provision
in the manner provided in ORS 93.272 for removal of a provision from an instrument conveying or contracting to convey real property.
(3) A homeowners association may adopt and enforce a provision that imposes reasonable
size, placement or aesthetic requirements for the installation or use of solar panels described in subsection (1) of this section.


 

IPL Indy 500 Parade Float Features Wind and Solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 26, 2017  /   Posted in 2017 Indiana General Assembly, solar, Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments

IPL Indy 500 float 1

IPL Indy 500 parade float 4

IPL Indy 500 parade float 3

IPL Indy 500 parade float 6

The theme for the 2017 Indianapolis 500 Parade is

Accelerating the American Spirit

As you can see from the above photos, Indianapolis Power and Light's (IPL's) 2017 parade float theme is:

Accelerate Power

IPL's float then prominently displays both wind turbines and solar panels. So what is the message? Does it mean that IPL wants to accelerate power sources such as wind and solar? But did IPL really accelerate their customer's ability to exercise their own American Spirit, Energy Freedom and Energy Choice this year? Instead didn't IPL along with the Indiana Energy Association (IEA) lobby the Indiana General Assembly this year to enact SEA 309 which eliminates perhaps the single most important state policy for individual home and business owners to install small wind and rooftop solar known as NET METERING?

What do you think?

SolarWorld may close Oregon factory

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 23, 2017  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments

BREAKING: SolarWorld may close Oregon factory

By Christian Roselund on May 22 2017, 7:29pm

The company has given WARN Act notices to all of its employees, and says that it is trying to determine the right size going forward.

Whatever criticisms that some in the industry have of SolarWorld, it is hard to say the the company is not transparent. Today, keeping in line with that the company’s U.S. subsidiary alerted the press that it had issued layoff notices through the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act to all of its employees.

WARN Act notices are required to be given by companies with more than 100 employees at least 60 days in advance of mass layoffs or plant closures. It is notable that a number of the other solar companies who recently had mass layoffs did not provide WARN Act notice to their employees.

SolarWorld could not confirm any additional details, such as whether the company’s ingot, cell and module would be downsized and remain open, or close. “We are trying to determine what is the right size for the organization going forwards,” SolarWorld Director of Strategic Affairs Ben Santarris told pv magazine.

As a direct subsidiary of Germany’s SolarWorld, SolarWorld Americas has been in trouble since the parent company filed for insolvency in German courts 12 days ago.

SolarWorld employs 800 workers in Oregon, and the company says that for the time being it is continuing production. The HIllsboro factory is the largest crystalline silicon manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere, with over 550 MW of annual module production capacity and 430 MW of cell capacity.

Opponents call Missouri net metering bill’s failure a ‘victory for consumers’

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 23, 2017  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 

solar-panels-943999_1920

Opponents call net metering bill’s failure a ‘victory for consumers’

by , Missouri Times

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – As the Missouri legislature returns to Jefferson City this week for a special session involving utility rates, opponents of another bill proposing to make changes to how Missouri’s law deals with net metering are still celebrating a victory.

The General Assembly adjourned a little over a week ago without passing Rep. Travis Fitzwater’s HB 340, which would have allowed utility companies to begin charging customers with solar panels an additional monthly fee.

The bill would allow energy suppliers to charge 75 percent of monthly fixed availability charges for “consumer-generators,” such as people with solar panels affixed to their roofs. Consumers who use “net metering,” a common-sense policy that allows homeowners and businesses to produce their own electric power, are credited for the power that they don’t use and send back onto the grid. In Missouri, homeowners and businesses receive a 1-for-1 bill credit for each kWh they put back onto the grid.

Supporters of the bill say it’s about creating fairness between solar and non-solar users. Critics of the bill, however, called it an onerous new tax on solar energy users, saying it would have resulted in the loss of 2,000 solar jobs, $200 million in solar company revenue, $50 million in sales tax revenue, and $15 million in payroll taxes.

The bill passed the House but was never taken up by the Senate.

“This job-killing energy tax would have devastated one of Missouri’s most innovative and fastest growing industries while making energy more expensive for thousands of solar energy users across the state,” said Zachary Wyatt-Gomez, Executive Director of Missouri Solar Energy Industry Association (MOSEIA). “We thank the members of the Missouri Senate for doing the right thing and putting the brakes on this anti-business and anti-consumer bill.”

“Missourians deserve clean, reliable, affordable energy — not backdoor tax hikes to line the pockets of big utility companies,” PJ Wilson, Executive Director of Renew Missouri, said. “The failure of this bill is a victory for families, businesses and our entire economy, and we thank the lawmakers who opposed it. These lawmakers listened to their constituents and the thousands of Missourians who contacted their representatives in opposition to this bill. Moving forward, rather than gouging renewable energy users with new taxes and fees, state leaders should help families and businesses by working to make solar energy even more affordable and accessible.”

But even though the bill failed to pass this year, the fact that it passed the House with a vote of 102-51 stands to reason that the legislation will most likely be brought forward again in the next legislative session, meaning both sides have a year to find compromises or strategize.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG