Author Archives Laura Arnold

IDEA Files Petition to Intervene in NIPSCO Feed-in Tariff Case

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 15, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Today (9/15/2010) Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates, Inc. (IDEA) filed a petition to intervene in the Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) case in Cause No. 43922. In this proceeding NIPSCO is proposing a to change in their net metering tariff and to propose a new feed-in tariff (FiT).

You can download IDEA's petition to intervene here:

43922_IDEA_Petition

The other participants currently include the Indiana Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and the Citizens Action Coalition (CAC) of Indiana.

If you are interested in more information or would like to support IDEA's petition to intervene, please contact Laura Ann Arnold at (317) 635-1701 or via email Laura.Arnold@indianaDG.org.

Technical Conference Set for 9/21 in NIPSCO Net Metering and Feed-in Tariff Case

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 14, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) approved the pre-hearing conference order on September 8, 2010 in the NIPSCO Net Metering and Feed-in Tariff case in Cause No. 43922. 

The Prehearing Conference Order can be downloaded here: 

43922order_090810[1]_prehearing conference order 

Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates (IDEA) plans to file a Petition to Intervene later this week and to participate in this proceeding to establish a revised net metering tariff and a new feed-in tariff for NIPSCO electric customers. 

The next step in this case is as follows: 

Technical Conference in Cause No. 43922 on Tuesday, September 21,2010 at 9:30 a.m., EDT, in Room 222 of the PNC Center, 101 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana.
An agenda, and any material supporting the specific issues to be addressed during the Technical Conference, shall be filed by the Petitioner on or before September 17, 2010.

  

  

To support IDEA and our participation in this case, please download, sign and return this Statement of Support. 

STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR IDEA in NIPSCO case 

AP: Ind. panel’s proposal would expand `net metering’

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 08, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
By RICK CALLAHAN (AP)

 

INDIANAPOLIS — A proposed expansion of Indiana's rules dictating which owners of wind turbines and other renewable power systems get credit for excess power they generate is drawing early support from clean energy advocates.

The draft "net metering" rule would boost the state's power cap for renewable power units and expand it to all customer classes served by electric utilities.

Under net metering, customers are charged only for the net amount of power they use. They get credit on future bills for excess power generated and sent into the electric grid.

But Indiana's current rules apply only to homeowners and K-12 schools and set a 10-kilowatt limit for each customer tapping the wind, sun or other clean energy sources.

The proposal drafted by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and released last week calls for expanding net metering to all customer classes and raising the power capacity 100-fold to 1 megawatt.

The panel agreed to revise the rules at the behest of state Sen. James Merritt, R-Indianapolis, after a push to update them failed in the Legislature's closing days this March for the second straight year.

Merritt said Tuesday he had not reviewed the proposed changes. But he said he's eager to hear the details of a technical workshop the commission will host Thursday on the draft rules.

Steve Francis of the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club said the group is "very supportive" of the proposed cap expansion and extending the rule to businesses, industries and municipalities — the classes he said would benefit most from a far higher cap.

"In our view, this will expand the use of net metering significantly in Indiana, create jobs that can't be outsourced and make Indiana more competitive with other states," he said.

Commission spokeswoman Danielle McGrath said the panel decided to revise the rules after public hearings in Indianapolis, Owensville and South Bend in June showed there was support.

McGrath said the proposed rule will be published in the Indiana Register, followed by a public hearing and a vote before the commission. The timeline is unclear, but she said Indiana rule-making typically takes 10 to 12 months.

State Rep. Ryan Dvorak, who sponsored legislation last session calling for a net metering overhaul, said a draft rule is progress "but there's some room for improvement."

Dvorak, D-South Bend, said he would prefer the state had no power cap for renewable systems. He said any such limit would only end up excluding customers with systems that generate more power than the cap level.

For example, he said the city of South Bend's planned 2 megawatt hydroelectric dam on the St. Joseph River would not be eligible for net metering under the proposed changes.

"When you draw these arbitrary caps, you're going to cut some people out when the goal behind this is to develop the industry and allow everybody in," Dvorak said.

The Indiana Energy Association, which represents Indiana's largest power companies, still is getting feedback from its electric utility members to assess their position on the proposed changes, said Ed Simcox, the group's chief executive officer.

He said the association is analyzing the "technical ramifications" of the proposed 1 megawatt cap to determine what its impact might be on investor-owned electric utilities.

Readying to Hit the Ground Running After Recess, Reid Says RES Alive

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 05, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Energy legislation that would include a renewable electricity standard (RES) “absolutely” remains a possibility for this year, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D), said this week.

The statements, coming as the Senator turned his attention to his annual energy conference in his home state of Nevada next week, were welcomed by the wind energy industry and its advocates, which prior to the August recess reached a far different conclusion from Reid about the ability of an RES to pass. Reid contended that an RES does not have the necessary 60 votes to avoid a filibuster, but wind energy advocates insisted that it does.

However, any gap between vote tallies appears to be narrowing. In his comments to reporters this week, Reid said two Republicans have expressed interest in an RES. While Reid did not name those Senators, Sam Brownback (Kan.) is one Republican who has publicly endorsed a 15% RES in recent weeks.

In a statement in early August, American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) CEO Denise Bode said, “There is tremendous bipartisan support for the renewable electricity standard, and we’re encouraged that Senate leadership is open to revisiting the bill in September. In recent days several Senators, including Republicans, made strong arguments for new policy to bring stability and continued growth to the American wind energy industry. That should come as no surprise. The RES has the greatest job-creation and job-protection potential of any energy policy Congress can consider this year. We are advancing our discussions with RES supporters in both parties to keep our industry competitive and to build a thriving clean energy manufacturing industry.”

This week, AWEA issued the following statement from Bode in response to Reid voicing confidence on the Senate energy bill:

“Today’s statement by Senator Reid that he sees more bipartisan support for a renewable electricity standard is a sure sign energy legislation is still very much in play. A recent Op-Ed by Senator Mark Udall and letter signed by labor, leading utilities, renewable energy trade associations, and most of the environmental community shows momentum is building throughout the nation. There is every reason the Senate can pass energy legislation with an RES.”

Congress returns to Washington, D.C., on September 13, but its working days are fewer this fall because of the election year.

Andrea Neal: As the wind wheels turn, Indiana leaves market alone

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 02, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
indystar.com

http://www.indystar.com/article/20100901/OPINION04/9010310/1038/OPINION04/As-the-wind-wheels-turn-Indiana-leaves-market-alone


September 1, 2010


Andrea Neal
As the wind wheels turn, Indiana leaves market alone

Andrea Neal

If the term "wind power" evokes images of picturesque Dutch windmills amidst a landscape of tulips, take a drive on I-65 north of Lafayette. A wind farm in an Indiana cornfield looks more like the setting for a sci-fi film than for a 17th-century Flemish painting.

Hundreds of turbines loom over the adjacent countryside. Rotary blades of 100 feet or more top massive towers and sweep a vertical airspace of just under an acre apiece.

"It is surreal, very surreal, the first time you see it," acknowledges Travis Murphy, program manager for renewable energy in the Indiana Office of Energy Development.

Hoosiers, get used to the sight. Indiana is in the middle of a wind power boom encouraged by liberal taxpayer subsidies at the federal level and plentiful wind resources and easy access to transmission lines at the state level.

Four wind farms producing 1,036 megawatts per year are online in Indiana; 20 more are being developed or have been proposed. The Fowler Ridge Wind Farm in Benton County operated by BP is the largest wind farm east of the Mississippi. Horizon Wind Energy, the one lining I-65 in White County, is expanding that site to produce more than 1,000 megawatts per year. That will make it one of the biggest wind farms in the world.

Interest in wind power is exploding even as the economics of wind power are under attack. Touted as a cost-effective alternative to fossil fuels, it's not that cheap and it isn't reducing reliance on fossil fuels, Robert Bryce wrote in the Aug. 23 Wall Street Journal.

Bryce, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, wrote, "A slew of recent studies show that wind-generated electricity likely won't result in any reduction in carbon emissions -- or that they'll be so small as to be almost meaningless."

At the same time, he noted, the wind industry receives much heavier subsidies than those for oil and gas. The federal government provides a production tax credit of just over 2 cents for each kilowatt-hour of electricity produced by wind, 200 times greater than those given to oil and gas on the basis of per-unit-of-energy produced.

If wind power alone provided electricity for a family of four, the Heritage Foundation calculated in March, it would cost $339 a month compared to $188 for coal. Statistics like these have critics worried that the federal government's push toward renewable energy will cost consumers in the long run.

Murphy has a different take on the situation. Indiana's objective isn't to replace fossil fuels with wind power, he said. In fact, it's "a bit of a misconception that it's going to get us off coal. Coal is a part of our energy mix and means a lot to our economy."

Murphy sees wind power as a way to add capacity in a market in which demand typically goes up 2 percent a year. It will do so in a cleaner and more fiscally stable manner than imported oil, for instance.

Indiana wisely has avoided precise targets for the percentage of energy that must come from alternative fuels. That's allowed the market to develop on its own. About 30 states have set specific requirements, and Congress has discussed doing so nationwide. California by 2020 will require utilities to get a third of their electricity from renewables, which critics fear will cause electricity costs there to skyrocket.

Murphy says Indiana's policy goal is to produce more of its energy using in-state resources. Local communities will take the lead in determining whether wind power is right for them. All four existing wind farms received local property tax abatements in addition to federal subsidies but no special incentives from the state.

That's as it should be. The verdict's not in on whether wind power makes economic or environmental sense. Whether you agree with federal subsidies or not, they're being handed out like candy, so -- unless you can't stand seeing those massive turbines -- there's no harm in Indiana getting in on the action.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG