Author Archives Laura Arnold

State Senate Candidate Eckerty supports nuclear power in Delaware County; State Senator Sue Errington proponent of renewable energy

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 06, 2010  /   Posted in 2010 Mid-term Election & Candidates, Uncategorized  /   1 Comments
 
Republican Doug Eckerty wants to look beyond wind to nuclear energy.

http://www.thestarpress.com/article/20101006/NEWS01/10060316

MUNCIE -- Forget wind energy; Doug Eckerty, a state Senate candidate, wants to see nuclear power reactors in Delaware County.

Sen. Sue Errington, D-Muncie, championed wind energy during a recent debate with Eckerty, a Republican real estate investor who expressed support for nuclear energy before being cut off by the time clock.

Eckerty told the audience at Ball State University that the United States can't compete with the Chinese in the manufacturing of wind, solar and other alternative energy products. He said the U.S. needs to look beyond wind, solar and biomass to energy sources of the future, including nuclear.

Errington, describing herself as a leading proponent of renewable energy at the Statehouse, responded: "I'm not ready to give this up to the Chinese. We are still in this fight."

In an interview after the debate, Eckerty said: "I am happy to have (wind turbine gear box maker) Brevini here, but there is a next thing besides wind and solar. If the Chinese decide to take over wind and solar, you and I know that's exactly what they will do. When they do something on a national basis, when they want to dominate a market, they will dominate the market. We need to look beyond wind to what's coming up next."

Within 10 years, Eckerty said, the United States should be installing "nuclear reactors not unlike what you find in a nuclear submarine, where you bring a reactor the size of a standard household deep freezer into a community and secure it underground. It could power half a community the size of Muncie for 100 years."

Despite fears of a nuclear accident and the lack of a permanent storage site anywhere for radioactive waste, Eckerty said he would welcome small nuclear power reactors to Delaware County.

"It doesn't matter what I think," he said. "We will see them."

He's not alone.

President Barack Obama is also pushing forward to revive the nuclear power industry. So is Energy Secretary Steven Chu, who says one of the most promising areas is small modular reactors.

Contact reporter Seth Slabaugh at 213-5834.

Duke Energy puts local CEO on leave amid state probe; Governor Fires IURC Chairman Over Ethics Flap

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 05, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Chris O'Malley
October 5, 2010
Duke Energy Corp. placed Mike Reed, CEO of its Indiana operations, on administrative leave Tuesday afternoon amid a state investigation that involves the company and resulted in the dismissal of the chairman of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

Duke Energy Corp. placed Mike Reed, president and CEO of its Indiana operations, on administrative leave Tuesday afternoon in the wake of a state investigation that involves the company and resulted in the dismissal of the chairman of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

Earlier in the day, Gov. Mitch Daniels fired IURC chief David Lott Hardy for allegedly allowing an agency official to continue presiding over a Duke Energy case even after talking with the utility about a job opportunity.

The governor in an announcement Tuesday morning said he was immediately replacing Hardy with Jim Atterholt as chairman of the IURC. Atterholt serves on the IURC and is the state’s former insurance commissioner.

The firing of Hardy follows the recent departure to Duke’s Plainfield office of Scott Storms, who had been administrative law judge for the IURC. Storms was presiding over a handful of cases involving Duke, including matters involving cost overruns at Duke’s Edwardsport generating plant.

Duke said Tuesday it was also putting Storms on administrative leave from his position in Duke’s legal-regulatory department. Reed and Storms will be on leave “pending the completion of a full evaluation,” Duke said in an announcement.

Storms and Duke previously sought an advisory opinion from the state ethics commission on whether Storms would be subject to a one-year cooling-off period from employment at Duke. The ethics commission said the cooling-off period didn’t apply to Storms, but rather to IURC commissioners involved in direct decision-making.

Critics, including the Citizens Action Coalition, said Storms, even as an administrative law judge, made critical decisions, such as whether or not to admit key evidence in utility cases.

David Pippen, Daniels' general counsel, said an internal review found that Storms was communicating with Duke about a job even while he was presiding over administrative hearings concerning Duke.

"Additionally, the agency head (Hardy) was aware of the communications and did not remove the lawyer from matters for which the lawyer was now conflicted,” Pippen told agency heads.

He added: “I wrote a letter to the IURC explaining the governor’s interpretation of the spirit and intention of the ethics reform he spearheaded when he came to office.”

Moreover, Daniels has directed that administrative opinions over which Storms presided will be reopened and reviewed “to ensure no undue influence was exerted in the decisions.”

It was not immediately clear which Duke cases those involved. “In short, he [Daniels] will not tolerate even the appearance of impropriety,” Pippen said in a memo to state agency heads.

Daniels also directed that a one-year cooling off period for decision makers is to be considered for those at the administrative law judge level, as well.

Further, the administration said it has referred the matter to the inspector general to determine if any laws were broken or whether misinformation was presented to the Ethics Commission.

The blowup is a potential embarrassment for the Daniels administration because  Reed was Daniels’ former commissioner of the Indiana Department of Transportation until leaving for Duke in June. Reed also was former executive director of the IURC under Daniels from 2006 to 2009.

Hardy, an attorney from Fort Wayne, was appointed to the IURC by Daniels in 2005 and was reappointed last year. His term was to have expired in 2014.

Until the mid-1980s, Hardy was an attorney for Public Service Indiana, the predecessor of North Carolina-based Duke’s operations in Indiana.

When Hardy was appointed to the commission five years ago the consumer group Citizens Action Coalition, which intervenes in utility regulation, warned that naming a former PSI lawyer was like “the chicken guarding the hen house.”

A Daniels administration spokeswoman at the time downplayed the affiliation, saying the commission needed someone who was experienced in utility industry matters.

Hardy could not be reached for comment Tuesday afternoon.

The action by Duke Energy was preceded by this action in the Governor's Office.

October 5, 2010
News Release
INDIANAPOLIS (October 5, 2010) -- Governor Mitch Daniels today terminated the employment of David Lott Hardy, chairman of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, effective immediately, and appointed IURC Commissioner Jim Atterholt as the commission’s new chair.
The action follows the departure of the IURC’s general counsel Scott Storms, who accepted employment with Duke Energy of Indiana in September, and a letter Daniels sent shortly thereafter to Hardy outlining his expectations of the IURC in upholding a formal ethics opinion on the matter
David Pippen, the governor’s general counsel, also sent a memo to all executive branch agency heads.
The text is below:

To: All Agency Heads/General Counsels
From: David Pippen, General Counsel to the Governor
Re: Ethics

Recently, a former general counsel and administrative law judge (ALJ) for the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission left state government to work for Duke Energy of Indiana, a regulated entity. I wrote a letter to the IURC explaining the Governor’s interpretation of the spirit and intention of the ethics reform he spearheaded when he came to office. In short, he will not tolerate even the appearance of impropriety.

Upon the Governor’s direction, an internal review of the matter revealed the lawyer was communicating with Duke regarding a position with the company at a time he was presiding over administrative hearings concerning Duke. Additionally, the agency head was aware of the communications and did not remove the lawyer from matters for which the lawyer was now conflicted.

So you understand the seriousness of this matter, I want you to know our response:
1. The Governor has terminated the employment of the chairman of the IURC;
2. The administrative opinions over which the ALJ presided regarding Duke will be reopened and reviewed to ensure no undue influence was exerted in the decisions;
3. The one-year cooling off period for decision makers are to be considered to include ALJs who preside over information gathering and order drafting; and
4. The matter has been referred to the Inspector General to determine if any laws were broken or misinformation given to the Ethics Commission when requesting a formal opinion;

To reiterate the ethics rules as they relate to regulated entities:
1. No ALJ should engage in communications with regulated entities regarding possible employment without recusing oneself from matters appearing before that regulator;
2. Administrative opinions over which an ALJ presided while pursuing employment opportunities with the regulated entity will be reopened and reviewed to ensure no undue influence was exerted in the decision;
3. The one-year cooling off period for decision makers includes ALJs who preside over information gathering and order drafting; and
4. Violations of these points will be referred to the Inspector General.

Please advise your staff to avoid this circumstance in the future.
Atterholt’s appointment is effective immediately. The governor will request that the IURC Nominating Committee begin the process of accepting applications to fill the open position on the commission.

Source: Office of the Indiana Governor

The story about Scott Storms going to work for Duke Energy was front page news in the Indianapolis Star last week.

If you missed this flap, check out the following articles:
 
http://www.indystar.com/article/20100922/BUSINESS/9220385/Consumer-group-criticizes-Indiana-regulator-s-move-to-Duke-Energy
 
http://www.indystar.com/article/20100925/LOCAL18/9250330/1197/LOCAL1802/Duke-vows-to-play-fair-with-new-lawyer
 
http://www.ibj.com/watchdogs-howl-over-duke-hiring-iurc-attorney/PARAMS/article/22460
 

IDEA Supports IREC Written Comments on IURC Draft Proposed Rule on Net Metering

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   October 03, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates (IDEA) endorsed the written comments filed by Jason Keyes with Keyes and Fox on behalf of the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) on the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) draft proposed rule on net metering.

IREC Indiana Net Metering Comments Sep 30 2010

IREC redline of Indiana draft NEM rule Sep 30 2010

Presentation on Feed-in Tariffs to WISER on 9/22/2010 in Delphi, Indiana

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 20, 2010  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

WISER Indiana Public Forums
 return on
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
at the
Wabash & Erie Canal Interpretive Center
Delphi, Indiana
 
 
What is the next step in the sustainable/renewable energy saga for Indiana?
 
Laura Arnold from Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates (IDEA)
will be presenting on a recently approved renewable energy incentive,
including the new Indianapolis Power & Light (IPL) Feed-in Tariff, called Rate REP and the proposed Feed-in Tariff by Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) called Experimental Rate 849.
 
What does this mean and how could it benefit you? 
 
Come join us to learn about this and other
WISER Public Forums
scheduled for this fall.
 
 
Please RSVP by clicking the link below:
http://www.wiserindiana
 
 
Date:           Wednesday, September 22, 2010
 
Time:          Doors open at 12:30 p.m. EDT
                    Forum starts at 1:00 p.m. EDT
 
Location:    Wabash & Erie Canal Interpretive Center
                     1030 N. Washington St.
                     Delphi, IN 46923
 
Speaker/Topic:    Laura Arnold - Renewable Energy Incentives (Feed-in Tariffs)
 
 
Questions?  Email our WISER intern, Tyler Cotterman at Tyler@wiserindiana.org
 
Also visit the WISER web site www.wiserindiana.org for news and updates.

Consumer & Environmental Groups Say Settlement on Edwardsport IGCC BAD for Indiana

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 18, 2010  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 

NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release:

September 17, 2010                                                         

Contact: Kerwin Olson (317) 702-0461 
John Blair (812) 464-5663                                        
 
Today, a coalition of consumer and environmental watchdog groups announced their opposition to the recently filed settlement agreement pertaining to the Edwardsport IGGC power plant currently under construction in Knox County, IN. 
 
The settlement, which still requires approval from The Utility Regulatory Commission, is unacceptable to the intervening parties for the following reasons.  
 
1)     It allows Duke to continue construction of the problem plagued project, even though Duke’s own witnesses state that cancelling the plant today is the least cost option for consumers.
2)     It does not provide a “hard-cap” on the cost of the project as the settlement claims but still allows Duke to increase capital costs above their latest estimates.
3)     The so-called “hard-cap” fails to include future environmental compliance costs, costs associated with governmental action, or “acts of God”.  Again, this allows Duke to raise costs above the so called “cap”.  Carbon compliance costs alone could cost additional billions of dollars.
4)     Limits prudency review of costs to only those above $2.75 billion, which is even higher than the estimate previously approved by the Commission.
5)     Duke’s acceptance of a “reduced” return is limited to only costs above the already approved $2.35B costs estimate.
6)     The self-imposed rate case moratorium until 2012 does nothing to protect consumers from the plant which will come online in 2012, which is when Duke would have filed a rate case anyway.
7)     Proposed changes to depreciation and capital are short lived as they can be lost in the next rate case in 2012.
 
“This settlement does nothing to change the fact that this plant first and foremost is not needed by Duke to fulfill their legal obligation of providing reliable electricity to their customers and is far too expensive,” stated Kerwin Olson, Program Director for the Citizens Action Coalition. 
 
Mr. Olson continued: “The Commission should reject this settlement in its entirety, immediately halt construction, and initiate an investigation on whether or not the project is necessary to meet demand and is in the public interest.”
 
John Blair, President of Valley Watch, asserts, "Duke and the OUCC have been complicit in misleading the public since this project was first proposed.  We outlined these exact pitfalls in our testimony before the IURC in August 2007 (http://valleywatch.net/index.asp?id_nav=3 ).  Unfortunately, the IURC and the OUCC failed to listen and now Indiana ratepayers in 69 counties will suffer needlessly for their complicity."
 
    *********************************************************************************
 
Grant Smith, Executive Director for Citizens Action Coalition: 1-317-442-8802

Richard Hill, President of Save the Valley: 1-812-273-6015

John Blair, President of Valley Watch: 1-812-464-5663

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG