Author Archives Laura Arnold

Blowing coal away; Wind power now competitive with coal in some regions

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 23, 2011  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Original Article: http://www.grist.org/article/2011-02-07-report-wind-power-now-competitive-with-coal-in-some-regions/?ref=se

by Todd Woody 

7 Feb 2011 4:45 PM

More good news on the renewable energy front Monday: The cost of onshore wind power has dropped to record lows, and in some regions is competitive with electricity generated by coal-fired plants, according to a survey by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a market research firm.

"The latest edition of our Wind Turbine Price Index shows wind continuing to become a competitive source of large-scale power," Michael Liebreich, Bloomberg New Energy Finance's chief executive, said in a statement.

"For the past few years, wind turbine costs went up due to rising demand around the world and the increasing price of steel," he added. "Behind the scenes, wind manufacturers were reducing their costs, and now we are seeing just how cheap wind energy can be when overcapacity in the supply chain works its way through to developers."

Driving the trend are falling prices for wind turbines, which have dropped to their lowest level since 2005, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Bloomberg said it based its analysis on a review of wind turbine contracts provided by 28 turbine buyers in 28 markets across the world. Those contacts represent nearly 7,000 megawatts' worth of turbines.

Of course, that's not necessarily good news for turbine manufacturers in the short term. But it makes wind energy more competitive over the long run. Over the past year the industry in the United States, for instance, has seen the wind taken out of its sails as demand has fallen due to the economy and natural gas prices have plummeted.

According to Bloomberg, contracts signed in late 2010 for turbines to be delivered in the first half of this year this year fell 7 percent from 2009 to an average of $1.33 million a megawatt. That's a 19 percent decline since 2007.

In some regions of Brazil, Mexico, Sweden, and the United States, the cost of electricity generated by wind farms is on par with coal-fired power, the report said. In those areas, the cost of wind-generated electricity is $68 per megawatt-hour compared to $67 a megawatt-hour for coal power and $56 per megawatt-hour for natural gas.

Meanwhile on Monday, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced that the federal government would grant $50.5 million over five years to spur offshore wind farm developments on the East Coast.

The money will go toward developing offshore wind technology and removing market barrier to building coastal wind farms.

Todd Woody is a veteran environmental journalist based in California.

Chicago Tribune: Ind. activists oppose nuclear incentive bill; IDEA says bill contains little for the state’s renewable sectors

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 20, 2011  /   Posted in 2011 Indiana General Assembly, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/wire/chi-ap-in-xgr-nuclearplants,0,5897625.story

chicagotribune.com

By RICK CALLAHAN

Associated Press

8:10 AM CST, February 20, 2011

INDIANAPOLIS

A bill that would offer Indiana's utilities incentives to build the state's first nuclear power plants is advancing in the Statehouse despite strong opposition from environmentalists, renewable energy boosters and industries that consume large amounts of electricity.

Supporters argue that the wide-ranging bill is needed to help the state meet its future energy needs, while opponents contend it would simply give utilities subsidies to design and construct multibillion dollar nuclear power plants without compelling them to control the costs of such big projects.

Opponents who include consumer and senior citizen groups also warn that the bill spurns Indiana's fledgling industry that's starting to tap into the state's wind power and other renewable energy sources.

The bill, which is scheduled for a vote Monday in the Republican-ruled Indiana Senate, would move to the GOP-controlled House for consideration if it passes.

One of the bill's authors, Sen. Beverly Gard, R-Greenfield, said it's needed to ensure that Indiana has enough power for its future needs.

"You want power. It's not going to fall out of the sky for free," she said Feb. 10 before the bill cleared the Senate's Utilities and Technology Committee.

Many of the bill's opponents warn that it would end up boosting the cost of electricity by shifting the risk of building power plants from utility companies to customers.

State Sen. Jean Breaux, D-Indianapolis, warns that the legislation "is being pushed under the guise of clean energy, but it's neither consumer friendly or environment friendly."

The bill contains three main elements, the first of which would allow utilities to quickly recoup their costs associated with complying with federal regulations.

A second provision would allow utilities to quickly recover the costs of designing, licensing and permitting nuclear power plants. Lawmakers have approved similar cost-recovery options in recent years for so-called clean-coal projects.

Indiana currently has no nuclear power plants. The state's first planned nuclear power plant, southern Indiana's Marble Hill power plant, was canceled in 1984 following billion-dollar cost overruns and safety concerns.

The bill also would replace a renewable electricity standard -- the idea of requiring the state to get a set amount of its power from renewable sources -- with a voluntary goal that would include "clean-coal," nuclear, waste-burning plants and other sources among a broader set of "renewable and low-carbon power" sources that would count toward a state goal.

One of the bill's sponsors, Sen. James Merritt, R-Indianapolis, said it's simply aimed at addressing the growing energy needs of the state, which currently gets more than 95 percent of its electricity from coal-fired power plants.

Even as those power needs are growing, Merritt said increased federal regulation of coal-fired power plants is making it nearly impossible to build such plants.

"What we're trying to do is to provide incentives for Indiana utilities to diversify their power generation," he said.

Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, said the bill as written would have a "devastating" effect on Indiana's renewable-energy sector. He said it could also hurt working class families and small businesses with higher energy costs in part due to "new ratepayer-funded subsidies for nuclear power."

"Utilities would have little incentive to control or manage costs," Kharbanda said.

Jack Wickes, an Indianapolis attorney who represents dozens of large industrial consumers of electricity, said the bill is actually "aimed at keeping utilities healthy" and would not encourage them to control project costs.

"The utilities would have no skin in the game really and it's pretty easy for them to just be seeking reimbursement, as opposed to having some responsibility for bringing projects in at the estimated price," Wickes said.

He noted that the cost of the $3 billion coal-gasification plant Duke Energy is building in southwestern Indiana is running about 30 percent above its initial construction cost estimate.

Indiana is one of 13 states without some form of a renewable electricity standard, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Thirty states have mandatory renewable energy requirements, while seven others have goals.

A 2008 study by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, Calif., found that about 70 percent of renewable investment in the U.S. is directed to states with renewable energy standards.

Indiana has seen big growth in the number of wind farms in the state, but the American Wind Energy Association said the current bill would do nothing to boost that industry.

"A missed opportunity here could cost Indiana thousands of jobs at a time of significantly high state unemployment," said Brad Lystra, the association's manager of state campaigns.

Laura Ann Arnold of Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates, a group that promotes renewable energy, said the bill contains little for the state's renewable sectors at a time when many states have progressive policies.

"Indiana is still behind -- we're really not with the program," Arnold said.

Indy airport’s planned solar farm would be the largest in the state

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 20, 2011  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
Original story: http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2011102190328
1:01 AM, Feb. 19, 2011  |  108Comments
Written by Bruce C. Smith
Solar panels like the ones planned at Indianapolis International Airport are already making money outside the Denver airport. / HYOUNG CHANG / The Denver Post

The warm rays of the sun may be the next big thing to make money for Indianapolis International Airport.

The airport is looking for a developer to build what would be the largest solar energy farm in the state on 30 acres of airport-owned land near the end of a runway.

It would generate 10 megawatts of electricity an hour -- enough to power up to 6,000 homes -- and that electricity would be sold to Indianapolis Power & Light. The airport would make money by leasing the property to a company that would build and operate the array of thousands of solar panels.

Other airports, including Denver and Fresno, Calif., have put money-making solar farms near runways on property not suitable for other types of developments.

It was not known how much revenue the solar farm would generate for the airport. The move is part of a larger plan approved by the airport Friday to generate more than $190 million over the next 30 years from hundreds of acres of its undeveloped land.

Industry experts estimate that a developer would have to spend $30 million to build the solar farm and that the equipment could generate electricity for at least 30 years.

"Solar power isn't just a hippie dream anymore," said Travis Murphy, who worked in the state's renewable energy agency and now sells solar systems for Johnson Melloh Solutions. "Solar energy is not just something that environmentalists will do anymore, but it has become an opportunity for businesses and homes."

The airport's solar farm would send a highly visible message of public support for renewable energy, said Mark Hedegard, the airport's senior business development director.

Thousands of solar panels -- tinted black so the glare doesn't blind airplane pilots -- would be planted next to the airport's front door. Millions of airplane passengers going to the Col. H. Weir Cook terminal building each year and millions more motorists on I-70 would pass the solar farm.

The site is tucked next to a long, circular ramp that is used by vehicles getting off the interstate and heading onto the road to the new terminal.

By far, it would be the biggest single solar power site in the state, according to Murphy. He said a survey last year conservatively estimated about 750 kilowatts of solar power had been built in Indiana.

An additional 1.76 megawatt array of 5,700 solar panels is being built on the roof of the Emmett J. Bean Federal Center, the military's finance facility in Lawrence.

Andrew Crocox, project manger for electric contractor Ermco, said the Bean array should be making electricity for the IPL grid by April.

Several industry insiders said federal tax credits and accelerated depreciation on the equipment have sparked a national rush to invest in solar power, along with methane gas, wind turbines and other renewable sources of energy.

Locally, IPL's interest in developing alternative energy sources has triggered a stampede of solar developers quietly swarming over Indianapolis the past year, looking for good sites and workable financing for solar power farms.

IPL was the first Indiana electric power company to receive approval from the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to provide a rate incentive to solar energy suppliers to feed power into its network.

IPL's website indicates it would pay up to 24 cents per kilowatt hour for solar energy, which is several times the rate paid for other forms of electricity. There also is a national market for energy generated from renewable sources. And some states -- not including Indiana -- set a quota of energy from renewable sources that their utilities are to sell.

IPL spokeswoman Crystal Livers-Powers said IPL's goal is to generate electricity from all forms of renewable sources equal to 1 percent of its 2010 sales, or roughly 150,000 megawatt hours of power.

However, even as the solar power industry gets into gear, IPL has flashed a red light.

Livers-Powers said IPL has filed a notice with the IURC to temporarily suspend its offer of the rate normally paid for solar electricity "until we present changes that limit the participation in the program to existing IPL customers."

IPL's rate was so attractive that out-of-state solar developers have been considering very large projects that would have used all of its capacity for renewable-source electricity, leaving none for IPL's current customers such as the airport.

She said, "We just want to give our current customers an opportunity to participate."

Call Star reporter Bruce C. Smith at (317) 444-6081.

Senator Gard Amendment #6 to SB 251 is confusing at best

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 17, 2011  /   Posted in 2011 Indiana General Assembly  /   No Comments

The six-page amendment filed 02/17/2011 @ 10:24 am by Sen. Beverly Gard (R-Greenfield) on SB 251 the so-called Clean Energy Bill is confusing at best.

It is next to impossible to understand the impact of this proposed amendment without matching up the amendment with the February 8, 2011 printed version of the bill.

It is true that page one of the proposed amendment amends IC 8-1-8.8-10 and deletes a laundry list of technologies defined as "renewable energy resources". Why this is being done in this amendment is as clear as mud to me right now. Two other bills, SB 66 and HB 1128, have been moving through this session of the Indiana General Assembly amending this section of the law. I was told by an informed source that some of the language in this amendment was suggested by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) but that doesn't make sense to me because the Commission's proposed new net metering regulations references this definition of "renewable energy resources" so why would they propose to delete it?

Does the right hand know what the left hand is doing?

There is another laundry list of "clean energy resources" which does include wind, solar, biomass, hydropower, hydrogen, algae, and geothermal in a new Chapter 37 creating a Clean Energy Portfolio Standard Program.

Again, I was told yesterday that a proposed amendment would create two buckets under this "VOLUNTARY" Clean Energy Portfolio Standard Program--one for true renewables and another for nuclear and coal. 

I guess I will just try to sit tight and listen to the explanation from the microphone IF SB 251 is called down for second reading this afternoon.

P.S. The Senate is on SB 217 right now on the Second Reading Calendar. There are two more bills--SB 222 and SB 240--before SB 251.

CORRECTION: Sen. Beverly Gard Proposes Amendment #6 to SB 251 to strip “true” renewables from definition of clean energy

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 17, 2011  /   Posted in 2011 Indiana General Assembly  /   2 Comments

Editor's Note: Please accept my deepest apology. I jumped the gun and rendered an interpretation of Sen. Gard's proposed amendment #6 to SB 251 in haste. Amendment #6 did delete the current definition of renewable energy BUT it also replaced it with another new definition of renewable energy in another section of the bill. In order to understand this it required looking at both the 6-page amendment and matching up the proposed changes to the 21-page February 8, 2011.

I suppose my only excuse is that I have been conditioned to expect the worse this session. An amended SB 251 will be on the Third Reading calendar in the Indiana State Senate this week.

To read the version of SB 251 the Indiana Senate will address can be found at Latest Printing (PDF) 

If you received or downloaded an earlier version of SB 251, you need to make sure you are now reading the Reprinted February 18, 2011 version of SB 251.

 To continue to watch the progress of this bill, please visit http://www.in.gov/apps/lsa/session/billwatch/billinfo?year=2011&request=getBill&docno=251

The saga goes on. Laura Ann Arnold

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An amendment was filed this morning (2/17/2011) on SB 251, the so-called Clean Energy Bill, authored by Sen. Beverly Gard,  Sen. Jim Merritt and Sen. Brandt Hershman, that would strip  "true" renewable energy resources such as wind, solar, biomass, hydro, etc. from the definition of "renewable energy resources". It is hard to understand what the reason or rationale would be for this proposed change. I have not had a chance to read and really digest the rest of this 6-page proposed amendment.

It is possible I am not reading this correctly but I don't think so. If I am correct then a really bad bill just became worse. I will try to continue to read and understand but I tought this was too important not to share with my blog readers right now.

The Indiana Senate is scheduled to go into session this afternoon at 1:30 pm EST, however, since both Senate Republicans and Senate Democrats were caucusing immediately prior to going into session it is doubtful they will start promptly at 1:30 pm.

Watch video from the Senate

Here is the text of the proposed amendment by Sen. Gard.

MADAM PRESIDENT:

    I move

that Senate Bill 251 be amended to read as follows:

<!-- WP Comment

SOURCE: Page 2, line 6; (11)MO025106.2. -->     Page 2, line 6, delete "safety." and insert " safety, including integrity, additions, enhancements, and replacement projects related to safe and reliable operation.".
    Page 4, line 9, after "from" insert " or increase the efficiency of".
    Page 5, line 33, after "energy" insert " production or".
    Page 5, line 33, strike "or coal gasification".
    Page 7, delete lines 1 through 33, begin a new paragraph and insert:
<!-- WP Comment
SOURCE: IC 8-1-8.8-10; (11)MO025106.11. -->     "SECTION 11. IC 8-1-8.8-10, AS AMENDED BY P.L.95-2010, SECTION 1, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011]: Sec. 10. (a) As used in this chapter "renewable energy resources" means alternative sources of renewable energy, including the following:
        (1) Energy from wind.
        (2) Solar energy.
        (3) Photovoltaic cells and panels.
        (4) Dedicated crops grown for energy production.
        (5) Organic waste biomass, including any of the following organic matter that is available on a renewable basis:
            (A) Agricultural crops.
            (B) Agricultural wastes and residues.
            (C) Wood and wood wastes, including the following:
                (i) Wood residues.
                (ii) Forest thinnings.
                (iii) Mill residue wood.
            (D) Animal wastes.
            (E) Animal byproducts.
            (F) Aquatic plants.
            (G) Algae.
        (6) Hydropower from existing dams.
        (7) Fuel cells.

        (8) Energy from waste to energy facilities.
        (9) Energy storage systems. a clean energy resource listed in IC 8-1-37-4(1) through (13).
    (b) Except for energy described in subsection (a)(8), from waste to energy facilities, the term does not include energy from the incinerations, burning, or heating of any of the following:
        (1) Tires.
        (2) General household, institutional, commercial, industrial lunchroom, office, or landscape waste.
    (c) The term excludes treated or painted lumber.".
<!-- WP Comment

SOURCE: Page 8, line 36; (11)MO025106.8. -->     Page 8, line 36, delete "financial incentives".
    Page 11, line 11, after "37." insert " Voluntary".
    Page 11, delete lines 18 through 25, begin a new line single block indented and insert:
        " (1) represents one (1) megawatt hour of clean energy that satisfies the applicable conditions set forth in section 12(c)(2) of this chapter;".
    Page 11, line 28, after "4." insert " (a)".
    Page 12, delete lines 13 through 35, begin a new line block indented and insert:
        " (12) Coal bed methane.
        (13) A source, technology, or program approved by the commission and designated as a clean energy resource by a rule adopted by the commission under IC 4-22-2.
        (14) Demand side management or energy efficiency initiatives that:
            (A) reduce electricity consumption; or
            (B) implement load management, demand response, or energy efficiency measures designed to shift customers' electric loads from periods of higher demand to periods of lower demand;
        as a result of equipment installed, or customers enrolled, after January 1, 2010.
        (15) A clean energy project described in IC 8-1-8.8-2(1).
        (16) Nuclear energy.
        (17) Electricity that is:
            (A) generated by a customer owned distributed generation facility that is interconnected to the electricity supplier's distribution system in accordance with the commission's interconnection standards set forth in 170 IAC 4-4.3; and
            (B) supplied back to the electricity supplier for use in meeting the electricity supplier's electricity demand requirements in accordance with the commission's net metering rules set forth in 170 IAC 4-4.2.
        (18) Combined heat and power systems.
        (19) Electricity that is generated from natural gas at a facilityconstructed in Indiana after July 1, 2011, which displaces electricity generation from an existing coal fired generation facility.

during the base year.
        (2) CPS Goal Period II: For the six (6) calendar years beginning January 1, 2019, and ending December 31, 2024, an average of at least seven percent (7%) of the total electricity obtained by the participating electricity supplier to meet the energy requirements of its Indiana retail electric customers during the base year.
        (3) CPS Goal Period III: In the calendar year ending December 31, 2025, at least ten percent (10%) of the total electricity obtained by the participating electricity supplier to meet the energy requirements of its Indiana retail electric customers during the base year.


    Page 16, line 31, delete "(f)" and insert " (g)".
    Page 16, line 32, delete "4(18)" and insert " 4(15) through 4(20)".
    Page 16, line 35, delete "shall" and insert " may".
    Page 16, line 35, delete "the following".
    Page 16, delete line 36.
    Page 16, line 37, delete "(1) A" and insert " a".
    Page 16, run in lines 35 through 37.
    Page 17, delete lines 1 through 9, begin a new line blocked left and insert:
" authorized by the commission under this subsection may:
        (1) be different for each of the CPS goal periods identified in section 12(a) of this chapter, as the commission determines is appropriate; and
        (2) in the case of a particular participating electricity supplier, be based on the extent to which the participating electricity supplier met a particular CPS goal using clean energy resources listed in section 4(1) through 4(13) of this chapter.
".
    Page 17, line 10, beginning with "The" begin a new line blocked left.
    Page 17, line 11, delete "subdivision" and insert " subsection".
    Page 17, line 12, delete "cumulative." and insert " cumulative and may not be authorized for a clean energy resource for which the commission has authorized an incentive under IC 8-1-8.8-11(a)(2).".
    Page 17, delete lines 20 through 42, begin a new paragraph and insert:
    " (b) If the commission approves an electricity supplier's application under section 11(c) of this chapter, the commission shall permit the recovery, by means of a periodic rate adjustment mechanism, of incentives based on the following:
        (1) The sharing of achieved savings or as a percentage of costs.
        (2) Avoided costs resulting from achieving demand side management or energy efficiency targets.
".
    Page 18, delete lines 1 through 3.
    Page 18, line 4, delete "(4)" and insert " (3)".
    Page 18, line 7, delete "(5)" and insert " (4)".
    Page 18, between lines 13 and 14, begin a new paragraph and insert:
    "

(c) If the commission approved an electricity supplier's application under section 11(c) of this chapter, the commission shall permit the recovery, by means of a periodic rate adjustment mechanism of all reasonable and necessary program costs incurred by a participating electricity supplier in:
        (1) constructing, operating, or maintaining facilities that generate clean energy that:
            (A) is used by the participating electricity supplier in itsefforts to meet a CPS goal set forth in section 12(a) of this chapter; and
            (B) meets the requirements set forth in section 12(c) of this chapter; or
        (2) otherwise generating or purchasing clean energy that is used by the participating electricity supplier in its efforts to meet a CPS goal set forth in section 12(a) of this chapter.
For purposes of this subsection and subsection (h)(1), "program costs" includes administrative costs, ancillary costs, capacity costs, costs associated with CECs, capital costs, depreciation costs, tax costs, and financing costs incurred in connection with an activity described in subdivision (1) or (2).

________________________________________
Senator GARD

".
    Page 18, line 14, delete "(b)" and insert " (d)".
    Page 18, line 15, after "(a)" insert " or periodic rate adjustment mechanisms established by the commission under subsection (b) or (c)".
    Page 18, line 21, after "incentives" insert " or periodic rate adjustment mechanisms".
    Page 18, line 22, delete "(c)" and insert " (e)".
    Page 18, line 26, delete "(d)" and insert " (f)".
    Page 18, line 28, after "incentives" insert " or periodic rate adjustment mechanisms".
    Page 18, line 33, delete "(e)" and insert " (g)".
    Page 18, line 37, delete "(a)(1)" and insert " (a)".
    Page 19, line 2, delete "(f)" and insert " (h)".
    Page 19, line 6, delete "(a)(2)" and insert " (c)".
    Page 19, line 13, delete "Subject to subsection (c), beginning" and insert " Beginning".
    Page 20, line 22, delete "12(e)" and insert " 12(f)".
    Page 20, line 37, delete "Subject to subsection (c), beginning" and insert " Beginning".
    Page 21, delete lines 5 through 10.
    (Reference is to SB 251 as printed February 14, 2011.)
".
    Page 12, line 36, delete "(19)" and insert " (20)".
    Page 12, between lines 37 and 38, begin a new paragraph and insert:
    " (b) Except for energy described in subsection (a)(9), the term does not include energy from the incineration, burning, or heating of any of the following:
        (1) Tires.
        (2) General household, institutional, commercial, industrial, lunchroom, office, or landscape waste.
    (c) The term excludes treated or painted lumber.
".
    Page 13, line 15, after "Indiana " insert " voluntary".
    Page 13, line 25, after "Indiana" insert " voluntary".
    Page 13, line 38, after "incentives" insert " and periodic rate adjustment mechanisms".
    Page 14, line 24, delete "The commission shall approve an application submitted".
    Page 14, line 25, delete "under subsection (a) if" and insert " If".
    Page 14, delete line 26, begin a new line single block indented and insert:
        " (1) an application submitted under subsection (a) is complete and reasonably complies with the purpose of this chapter; and".
    Page 14, line 29, delete "supplying" and insert " obtaining".
    Page 14, line 29, after "to" insert " meet the energy requirements of".
    Page 14, line 34, delete "chapter." and insert " chapter;
the commission shall approve the application. If, however, the commission determines that the application does not meet the requirements set forth in this subsection, the commission shall reject the application. The electricity supplier that submitted the application under subsection (a) bears the burden of proving to the commission that the application meets the requirements set forth in this subsection.
".
    Page 14, line 35, delete "(b)," and insert " (c),".
    Page 14, line 37, delete "supply" and insert " obtain".
    Page 14, line 37, after "to" insert " meet the energy requirements of".
    Page 14, delete lines 40 through 42, begin a new line single block indented and insert:
        " (1) CPS Goal Period I: For the six (6) calendar years beginning January 1, 2013, and ending December 31, 2018, an average of at least four percent (4%) of the total electricity obtained by the participating electricity supplier to meet the energy requirements of its Indiana retail electric customers ".
    Page 15, delete lines 1 through 19.
    Page 15, line 20, before "For" begin a new paragraph and insert " (b)".
    Page 15, line 20, delete "this subsection," and insert " subsection (a),".
    Page 15, line 23, after "energy" insert " as follows:
        (1) Subject to subdivision (2), for clean energy
".
    Page 15, between lines 25 and 26, begin a new line single block indented and insert:
        " (2) For clean energy that is generated by a facility located in Indiana from a clean energy resource listed in section 4(1) through 4(13) of this chapter by a factor of one and five tenths (1.5).".
    Page 15, line 26, delete "(b)" and insert " (c)".
    Page 15, line 29, delete "(e)," and insert " (f),".
    Page 15, line 29, delete "supplied" and insert " obtained".
    Page 15, line 30, after "to" insert " meet the energy requirements of".
    Page 15, delete lines 33 through 42, begin a new line single block indented and insert:
        " (2) is generated by a facility located in a control area that is part of a regional transmission organization of which an electricity supplier is a member.".
    Page 16, delete lines 1 through 18, begin a new paragraph and insert:
    " (d) An electricity supplier is not required to obtain clean energy to meet a particular CPS goal if the commission determines that the cost of clean energy resources available to the electricity supplier would result in an increase in the rates and charges of the electricity supplier that would not be just and reasonable.".
    Page 16, line 19, delete "(d)" and insert " (e)".
    Page 16, line 22, delete "one (1) of".
    Page 16, line 22, delete "(b)(2)." and insert " (c)(2).".
    Page 16, line 23, delete "(e)" and insert " (f)".

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG