Author Archives Laura Arnold

SEIA Statement on Proposed No More Solyndras Act’; “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater”

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 12, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

For Immediate Release
July 12, 2012

SEIA Statement on Proposed No More Solyndras Act

WASHINGTON - Today, the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee and the Energy and Power Subcommittee held a legislative hearing on the discussion draft of the No More Solyndras Act.  Rhone Resch, President and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association® (SEIA®), issued the following statement on the discussion draft:

"The solar industry supports efforts to ensure that taxpayer dollars are protected and used wisely to increase the effectiveness of Department of Energy ("DOE") Loan Guarantee Program. The solar industry stands ready to work with policymakers on a bipartisan basis to achieve these common sense goals and improve the loan program.

"Unfortunately, the discussion draft – as was noted on multiple occasions in the legislative hearing – would 'throw the baby out with the bathwater.' The loan program has been utilized on a bipartisan basis to leverage private capital to promote transportation, health care, education, housing and energy infrastructure policies.  The provision in the discussion draft that sunsets DOE's loan program would hinder our nation's ability to develop innovative energy infrastructure projects.  In solar alone, this program has achieved a number of notable successes. Chief among these are 11 utilityscale solar power plants in the Southwest, totaling 2,700 megawatts – enough to power 500,000 homes.

"The solar industry welcomes the opportunity to work with Congress and the Administration to improve the DOE loan program."

The U.S. solar energy industry employs 100,000 Americans at more than 5,600 companies, mostly small businesses, across the nation in all 50 states.

About SEIA®:
Established in 1974, the Solar Energy Industries Association® is the national trade association of the U.S. solar energy industry. Through advocacy and education, SEIA is working to build a strong solar industry to power America. As the voice of the industry, SEIA works with its 1,000 member companies to make solar a mainstream and significant energy source by expanding markets, removing market barriers, strengthening the industry and educating the public on the benefits of solar energy. www.seia.org

Background Materials:
Facts on the DOE Loan Program: http://www.seia.org/policy/finance-tax/doe-loan-guarantee-program

Media Contacts:
Monique Hanis, 202.556.2885, mhanis@seia.org
Susan DeVico, 510.339.1527, SusanDV@aol.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is a link to the Draft "No More Solyndras Act"

http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Joint/20120712_EP_OI/BILLS-112hr-PIH-nomoresolyndras.pdf

Energy defends loan guarantees, attacks GOP for offering 'No More Solyndras' bill

By Ben Geman - 07/12/12 08:34 AM ET from E2 Wire, The Hill's Energy & Environment Blog

The Energy Department (DOE) is trying to counter fresh GOP legislative and political attacks against the department's embattled loan guarantee program.

A senior DOE official will tell lawmakers Thursday that House GOP legislation called the "No More Solyndras Act" would harm the program without boosting taxpayer protections. The legislation would create new restrictions on clean energy loan guarantees.

David Frantz, the acting head of the loan programs office, says in testimony to the House Energy and Commerce Committee that DOE has already made a series of improvements to the program.

"This effort has included improvements to the way loan guarantees are originated and the way in which they are monitored. With these improvements in place, the department has concerns that the legislation would not result in increased taxpayer protections, but would instead hinder effective implementation of this important program," he states in written testimony submitted for a Thursday hearing.

The loan program is under fire from Republicans over the collapse of the solar panel manufacturer Solyndra, as well as the more recent bankruptcy of Abound Solar and headwinds facing other DOE-backed companies. GOP lawmakers say they represent recklessness with taxpayer dollars and the failure of the White House green energy agenda.

Top Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans floated a draft bill this week that would sunset the loan guarantee program, barring any new guarantees for applications received after the end of 2011.

The "No More Solyndras Act," which is the subject of Thursday's hearing, also creates new parameters for the review of current applications. More on that here.

The measure is named after the California company that went belly-up last year after winning a $535 million loan guarantee in 2009.

Obama administration officials have counterpunched amid the GOP attacks, arguing that the woes of a few companies should not obscure the success of the wider loan portfolio.

"The troubles of some segments in the solar manufacturing market should not overshadow the great work that the department's loan programs have done to date, or the need to continue to find ways to support clean energy deployment in this country," Frantz states.

The bill also prevents the "subordination" of taxpayer interests to private investors.

Republicans have slammed the early 2011 decision to restructure the Solyndra loan that put private investors — who were providing additional capital to the struggling firm — ahead of taxpayers for repayment if the company collapsed.

But Frantz, during the hearing, said it's important to keep the ability to subordinate as a last-ditch tool rescue a highly distressed loan recipient.

"This tool would only be used in extreme situations," he said.

"You would be hamstringing us and taking a very critical tool that could, in fact, save taxpayers' money," Frantz said of the GOP bill to bar subordination.

The loan program was first authorized in a bipartisan 2005 energy law, and expanded in the 2009 stimulus, which ultimately provided backing for Solyndra and other solar equipment manufacturing, as well as wind, solar and geothermal power-generation projects.

The overall program is authorized to support technologies including renewables, nuclear power, transmission and low-emissions fossil energy such as carbon control technologies projects for coal-fired power.

In addition to the renewables guarantees, other projects approved or conditionally approved include a preliminary commitment for an $8.3 billion guarantee to help utility giant Southern Co. build a pair of nuclear reactors in Georgia.

Loan program officials are currently "performing due diligence on several advanced fossil projects," according to Frantz.

House Republicans floated legislation Tuesday that would sunset the Energy Department's controversial loan guarantee program for green energy projects.

The draft bill, which Republicans call the "No More Solyndras Act," would bar the Energy Department (DOE) from granting loan guarantees for any applications received after the end of 2011.

House GOP floats 'No More Solyndras Act'

By Ben Geman - 07/10/12 01:27 PM ET

For existing applications, the bill — which is named after the failed DOE-backed solar firm Solyndra — sets new parameters for reviewing the requests. The department currently has authority to issue $34 billion worth of loan guarantees, according to the draft bill.

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), Upton's point man on the committee's Solyndra probe, are the sponsors of the draft bill that will be the subject of a committee hearing Thursday.

Stearns said Monday evening that he's hoping for a floor vote before the congressional August recess. "Our 'No More Solyndras Act' will ensure taxpayers are no longer vulnerable to the Obama administration's game of crony capitalism," Stearns said in a statement Tuesday.

But the plan could run into conflict with lawmakers who say the loan program should be altered, not scrapped. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, the top Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has taken a mend-it-don't-end-it approach.

Republicans have pounced on the 2011 collapse of Solyndra, which had received a $535 million loan guarantee in 2009, as well as the more recent bankruptcy of Abound Solar and headwinds facing other DOE-backed companies, alleging they represent the failure of the White House green energy agenda.

But administration officials have pushed back against the attacks, arguing they obscure the successes of the loan guarantee program, which was first authorized in a bipartisan 2005 energy law and expanded through a stimulus law program that ultimately backed Solyndra and other companies.

In addition to sun-setting the program, the bill would set new restrictions on review of existing loan guarantee applications that are meant to correct what Republicans call deep flaws in DOE's vetting process.

A White House-commissioned report released earlier this year also recommended improvements to the program.

The bill would require that no guarantees may be made until the Treasury Department reviews them and makes a recommendation to the Energy Department, and states that if DOE makes a guarantee that's not consistent with Treasury's recommendation, DOE officials must provide a report to Congress explaining why.

It also requires DOE to consult with Treasury on the restructuring of any loan guarantees, and prevents the "subordination" of taxpayer interests to private investors.

Republicans have slammed the early 2011 decision to restructure the Solyndra loan that put private investors — who were providing additional capital to the struggling firm — ahead of taxpayers for repayment after the company collapsed.

The Energy Department did not provide immediate comment.

IPL Contemplating New Gas-Fired Power Plant to Replace Coal-Fired Power Plants

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 09, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Dear Indiana DG Readers:

Given the issuance of this RFP by IPL for 600 MWs of new power, you would think there should be a discussion of how best to meet these new power needs due to the retirement of their coal-fired units. What role should renewable energy and distributed generation play? So if IPL doesn't like solar PV anymore then what about some additional cogeneration or combined heat and power (CHP)? We know they can't build a 600 MW wind farm in Indianapolis but there may be other options. More when I get a chance to review the RFP.

What do you think? Please share your thoughts with other IndianaDG readers?

Laura Ann Arnold

-------------------------------------------------------

InsideINdianaBusiness.com Report

Indianapolis Power & Light Co. is planning to retire some coal-fired generation operations in the next several years. The utility has issued a request for proposals to replace the power generated by its Eagle Valley and Harding Street stations. That includes the possibility of building a new 600 megawatt gas-fired power plant.

IPL  is also considering purchasing existing facilities. Responses to the request for proposals are due in September.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 9, 2012

News Release

Indianapolis, IN - - Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL) today issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for 600 megawatts (MW) of gas-fired combined cycle generation beginning in June 2017. The RFP is intended to provide IPL with possible options to replace a like amount of existing coal-fired generation at its Eagle Valley and Harding Street stations that is likely to be retired over the next several years.

In conjunction with the RFP and consistent with the company’s Integrated Resource Plan, IPL is  evaluating whether to build a 600MW natural gas-fired combined cycle unit in the Central Indianapolis area.

In addition to the RFP and self-build options, IPL is also considering purchasing existing power plants or some combination of these options.

“The combination of current and expected environmental regulations make it likely that IPL will retire several of our existing coal-fired, smaller and older generating units within the next several years,” said Ken Zagzebski, CEO of IPL. “To ensure our customers continue to receive safe, reliable and affordable power, we are studying a variety of available options for new power generation. The issuance of this RFP is the next step in that process.”

Reponses to the RFP must be submitted on or before September 10, 2012.

Source: Indianapolis Power & Light

IBJ: IPL pulling plug on renewable-energy effort; IndianaDG disappointed Feed-in Tariff (FIT) or Rate REP not to be extended after 3/30/13

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 07, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), IPL Rate REP, Uncategorized  /   1 Comments

Dear IndianaDG Blog Readers:

This is the follow-up to our blog post with the News Release and Letter sent to Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL) President and CEO Ken Zagzebski. See http://wp.me/pMRZi-Kb. It is interesting to note that the letter sent to Ken Zagzebski by Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance, Citizens Action Coalition and the Sierra Club has yet to receive a response. Instead, IPL VP William Henley sent a letter to Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) Chairman Jim Atterholt. 

Click here to read the letter IPL sent to the IURC: Letter from William Henley to Atterholt_2012-06-28

Henley's letter also indicates that parties to the proceeding in Cause No. 44018 would also be contacted but as far as I know that also has not happened as of this blog post.

Please watch for additional blog posts on IPL's Rate REP for further updates and analysis.

Laura Ann Arnold

P.S. A big "THANKS" to IBJ Report Chris O'Malley who wrote this story.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chris O'Malley July 5, 2012, Indianapolis Business Journal

Indianapolis Power & Light says it will stop buying electricity from customers who generate it from renewable sources—a blow to advocates of wind, solar and other clean forms of energy.

The 6,152 solar panels atop the Maj. Gen. Emmett J. Bean Federal Center generate about 1.8 megawatts of electricity that's sold to Indianapolis Power & Light. (AP photo)

The utility's 3-year-old Renewable Energy Production program, or REP, expires next March 30. Proponents of renewable energy, who'd praised IPL for creating the program, in recent months implored the utility to extend and expand it.

So far, IPL has agreed to purchase 2.2 megawatts of power generated by a handful of customers under contracts of up to 15 years. IPL estimates it will pay about $567,000 for that power.

Projects providing another 30 megawatts are pending, including a 10-megawatt solar farm slated to be built this summer at Indianapolis International Airport.

An additional 30 megawatts will be obtained through a "reverse auction," which favors the applicant offering to sell power to the utility at the least unit cost.

"IPL anticipates more projects proposed before the program expires in March," said Crystal Livers Powers, spokeswoman for the utility serving 470,000 customers, principally in Marion County.

A letter IPL sent June 28 to Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Chairman James Atterholt cites several reasons for not continuing the pilot.

IPL said it already has contracts to purchase 300 megawatts of electricity generated by utility-scale wind farms to promote clean energy and as a hedge against high costs that might result from a federally mandated renewable energy program in the future.

"However, in the current energy environment, increasing the amount of renewable energy, which now costs more than traditional forms of generation, must be balanced against other expected cost increases such as those necessary to comply with Environmental Protection Agency mandates."

IPL said earlier this year it may have to spend upward of $900 million to equip its power plants with scrubbers to reduce harmful emissions.

IPL's ratepayers will pay for those upgrades through higher electric bills.

The utility also cited rising costs for photovoltaic solar panels, in part due to higher levies on panels from China, and the phaseout of federal tax incentives for renewable projects.

Thus, customers proposing renewable energy projects might find their costs rising unless IPL pays them more for power under the long-term contract.

IPL pays anywhere from 7.5 cents per kilowatt-hour for large wind turbines to 24 cents per kilowatt-hour for solar projects.

IPL ratepayers shoulder the cost of buying renewable power under the REP program, and paying more for power under the program would "put pressure on customers' rates at a time when rates are expected to increase due to the new environmental compliance costs," IPL wrote.

Finally, IPL told the commission the REP program has not generated the level of interest among customers that it originally expected.

IPL theorizes that part of the problem may be the economic downturn. The greatest interest has been from developers interested in creating projects that are eventually sold to third-party investors, the utility said.

Though many developers have sought to partner with IPL customers so they can qualify for the REP program, such projects are a "financial play" that benefits tax investors "and only marginally benefits host customers who do not always understand the obligations and risks that must be assumed as a result of such a partnership."

It's true that some of the projects are complicated. The airport's solar farm, for example, is being constructed through a joint venture of three local firms: architectural/engineering firm Schmidt Associates, telecommunications services firm Telamon Corp. and Johnson-Melloh Solutions, a contractor involved in several renewable projects around the region.

The Indianapolis Airport Authority expects to collect $316,000 annually from the solar-farm partnership, which will feed all the solar panels' output into IPL's grid.

Many IPL customers simply will not embark on renewable projects unless they have the long-term financial assurances the REP program provides, said Laura Arnold, president of the Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance, who said she's disappointed in IPL's decision.

"Even when the customer wants to do this, they often don't have the cash upfront" for the investment, she said. "There's not going to be as much interest" now.

"The idea of just abandoning the program—a program that had so much interest—is clearly wrongheaded," said Dave Menzer, who heads the Sierra Club's "Beyond Coal" campaign in Indiana.

If anything, Menzer said, renewable power now looks more cost-effective when factoring-in the hundreds of millions of dollars IPL will need to spend on additional pollution controls on its coal plants.

Those costs will soar further for future carbon dioxide emission caps, he added.

Ratepayers can pay for either those pollution upgrades or for renewable generation, "but if we had our choice, let's promote new technology and clean energy and job creation," he said of renewable generation.

On the other hand, some industry critics say a utility can generate a higher rate of return on a conventionally fueled power plant and that such a prospect is foremost in the minds of investor-owned utilities.

To that extent, IPL is looking to add additional generation in the form of natural-gas-fueled plants. Late last month, the subsidiary of Virginia-based AES Corp. issued a request for proposals for 600 megawatts of gas-fired generation, starting in 2017.

Such generation could replace a like amount of existing coal-fired generation at its Eagle Valley plant in Martinsville or its Harding Street facility.

IPL said it's evaluating whether to build a natural gas unit in the Indianapolis area, as well as considering whether to buy existing power plants "or some combination of these options."

IPL's so-called net metering program will continue. Under net metering, IPL issues a credit on the bills of customers who generate excess power each month through renewable sources, up to 1 megawatt.•

Abound Solar to Suspend Operations, Will Seek Bankruptcy; Abound Solar Follows Bankruptcy of Uni-Solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 28, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
Dear Indiana DG Readers:
 
Abound Solar is planning to file bankruptcy next week. That means they won't be manufacturing solar thin film PV panels in Tipton, Indiana.
 
Abound is the second thin film solar PV company to file bankruptcy recently.
 
Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. ("ECD"), a leader in materials science and renewable energy technologies, and its wholly-owned subsidiary United Solar Ovonic LLC ("USO"), will sell by public auction, to be authorized by the United States Bankruptcy Court, substantially all of its assets relating to its solar business. The auction will commence on June 26, 2012. Assets for sale will include machinery, equipment, intellectual property, furniture, real estate and inventory.

The auction sale process has been designed to facilitate the sale of assets in various bulk and piecemeal configurations, and to maximize the opportunity to sell the integrated assets in bulk to permit future manufacturing of USO’s proprietary Uni-Solar© brand thin-film solar laminates.

The live webcast auction sale will commence on Tuesday June 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM ET at USO’s Greenville, Michigan facility.

ECD and USO voluntarily filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on February 14, 2012. Additional information regarding the bankruptcy proceedings is available at www.energyconversiondevices.com/restructuring.php.

 Laura Ann Arnold
 

Bloomberg News

By Christopher Martin and Jim Snyder on June 28, 2012

Abound Solar Inc., a U.S. solar manufacturer that was awarded a $400 million U.S. loan guarantee, will suspend operations and file for bankruptcy because its panels were too expensive to compete.

Abound borrowed about $70 million against the guarantee, the Loveland, Colorado-based company said today in a statement. It plans to file for bankruptcy protection in Wilmington, Delaware, next week.

The failure will follow that of Solyndra LLC, which shut down in August after receiving a $535 million loan guarantee from the same U.S. Energy Department program. Abound stopped production in February to focus on reducing costs after a global oversupply and increasing competition from China drove down the price of solar panels by half last year.

“Aggressive pricing actions from Chinese solar-panel companies have made it very difficult for an early stage startup company like Abound to scale in current market conditions,” the company said in the statement.

U.S. taxpayers may lose $40 million to $60 million on the loan after Abound’s assets are sold and the bankruptcy proceeding closes, Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman, said in a statement today.

“When the floor fell out on the price of solar panels, Abound’s product was no longer cost competitive,” LaVera said.

Bankruptcy Warning

Cliff Stearns, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s oversight panel that has held several hearings and collected thousands of administration e-mails relating to Solyndra’s guarantee, said he didn’t think Abound’s closure warranted its own investigation.

“We know why they went bankrupt. We warned them they would go bankrupt,” Stearns, a Florida Republican, told reporters today. “The larger question is why the administration was pursuing a green-energy policy in which companies are going bankrupt and wasting taxpayer money.”

Stearns said his panel would probably hold a hearing on the guarantee program. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, continues to investigate the loan-guarantee program and still hasn’t received some requested documents from the Energy Department, said Jeffrey Solsby, a spokesman for Issa.

Abound was awarded the loan guarantee to build two factories to make thin-film panels using cadmium telluride. It completed one plant, in Longmont, Colorado, and never began construction on the second, which was planned for Tipton, Indiana. The company last received money from the Energy Department in August, before Solyndra’s collapse.

Economic Boost

Representative Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican, said he supported Abound because he thought the company would boost his state’s economy.

“We had a terrible economic problem. Plants were closing there in that area,” Burton told reporters in Capitol Hill today. “We thought this would be a great way to create jobs. If I had known that Abound, or Solyndra, had been in the fiscal situation it was in, I certainly would have never supported it.”

“This is not surprising at all,” Anthony Kim, an analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance in New York, said today in an interview. “They were trying to sell to a competitive, over- supplied market with limited production. That keeps costs high.”

$35 Billion

The Energy Department has provided almost $35 billion in loans, loan guarantees and conditional commitments to renewable- energy companies. About 35 percent of that is for solar- generating projects, which benefit from falling panel prices, compared with less than 4 percent for solar manufacturers, according to LaVera.

Besides Abound and Solyndra, two other solar manufacturers received loan guarantees. 1366 Technologies Inc. won approval to borrow as much as $150 million to produce polysilicon for solar panels and SoloPower Inc. was awarded a $197 million guarantee to make rolls of flexible solar panels using a copper-indium- gallium-selenide composite.

Neither 1366 nor SoloPower have drawn funding under the Energy Department program, LaVera said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Christopher Martin in New York at cmartin11@bloomberg.net; Jim Snyder in Washington at jsnyder24@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reed Landberg at landberg@bloomberg.net

Indiana Groups Urge Indianapolis Power and Light to Extend Feed-in Tariff Pilot Program Called Rate REP

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 27, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), IPL Rate REP, Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Indiana DG/Citizens Action Coalition/Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter

NEWS RELEASE

For Immediate Release: June 27, 2012      

Contact:     

Laura Ann Arnold (317) 635-1701 or (317) 502-5123

Kerwin Olson (317) 702-0461 

David Menzer (317) 727-8467                                                                

RENEWABLE ENERGY, CONSUMER ADVOCACY AND ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS

JOIN TO ASK IPL TO EXTEND RENEWABLE ENERGY PILOT PROGRAM

Download News Release: IPL Rate REP News Release-FINAL-2012-06-27_as sent

Indianapolis, IN. Three statewide groups, representing renewable energy, consumer and environmental interests in Indiana, joined together to send a letter to Ken Zagzebski, President of Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL), asking the electric utility to extend and expand a renewable energy program known as Rate REP or Renewable Energy Production, commonly referred to as feed-in tariff (FIT) or Clean Local Energy Accessible Now (CLEAN programs).

"We want to commend IPL for its leadership in offering Rate REP," said Laura Ann Arnold, President of the Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance. "But due to major changes made to the program and approved earlier this year by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC), the program really needs to be extended past the initial three year pilot."

Arnold pointed out that the program is capped at 1% of IPL's retail sales. This could bring as much as 100 MW's of renewable energy into central Indiana; however, thus far, less than 2.5 MWs have been approved by IPL's Rate REP, which became effective on March 30th, 2010.

By comparison, the electric utility that services NW Indiana, Northern Indiana Public Service Corporation (NIPSCO), recently implemented a FIT pilot program in cooperation with Indiana DG, CAC, and Sierra Club, that became effective less than a year ago on July 14th, 2011. As of this month, NIPSCO indicates that nearly 25 MW's of solar PV, wind and biomass projects are pending under their feed-in tariff.

Therefore, it appears that NIPSCO in one year has nearly 10 times as many projects pending as the projects approved by IPL. It is generally believed that the Indianapolis Airport solar farm with 10 MW's of solar PV is still under review for a Rate REP contract at IPL.

Arnold noted that before IPL proposed making significant changes to Rate REP after only the first year of their 3 year pilot program, 170 MWs of solar PV and wind projects had already been proposed. Arnold wonders what will happen to said projects if the IPL program is discontinued.

"We are hopeful that IPL will continue this program in an effort to diversify their generation portfolio, bring investment to Indianapolis which will create desperately needed jobs, and help decrease their environmental footprint which is of great importance in the wake of new and pending EPA regulations, especially considering the risk IPL and its customers currently face due to their heavy reliance on coal fired power plants," said Kerwin Olson, Executive Director of CAC.

Dave Menzer, Campaign Representative for the Sierra Club's "Beyond Coal Campaign" stressed that more renewable energy resources need to be added to IPL's generation mix to improve Indiana's environmental quality. Menzer stated that Sierra Club is urging other Indiana utilities to consider voluntarily offering more renewable energy programs such as FITs.

"The Sierra Club supports a transition to a clean energy economy, and one of the best tools to attract private investment in solar and wind farms is to offer a fair fixed rate to the developer for the power they are producing and putting back on the grid. Given the incredible interest IPL has seen, it would a huge step backwards to allow these programs to expire."

-30-

------------------------------------------------------------------

Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance (http://www.IndianaDG.net) is the group which is the successor-in-interest to Indiana Distributed Energy Advocates which was a participant in both the IPL Rate REP and the NIPSCO feed-in tariff cases before the IURC. IndianaDG works with national/international groups such as the Alliance for Renewable Energy which works to promote feed-in tariff programs as the most effective public policy to deploy renewable energy resources in the most cost effective way.

Citizen Action Coalition's (http:/www.citact.org) mission is to initiate, facilitate and coordinate citizen action directed to improving the quality of life of all inhabitants of the State of Indiana through principled advocacy of public policies to preserve democracy, conserve natural resources, protect the environment, and provide affordable access to essential human services. With a continued emphasis on truly clean renewables, distributed resources, and energy efficiency, CAC is a firm believer that clean, safe, and affordable energy is not only attainable, but it is our right as an essential human service.

Sierra Club- is America's largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization. Inspired by nature, we are 1.4 million of your friends and neighbors, working together to protect our communities and the planet. More information about the "Beyond Coal Campaign" can be found here: http://www.beyondcoal.org/

Download letter: Letter to IPL on Rate REP--2012-06-27--FINAL as sent

27 June 2012

Ken Zagzebski, President and CEO

Indianapolis Power and Light

One Monument Circle

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Dear Mr. Zagzebski,

We, the undersigned organizations, represent both businesses doing business with individual ratepayers and individual ratepayers of Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL). We are writing to urge that you initiate a proceeding before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) to extend and expand opportunities for IPL customers under Rate REP or feed-in tariff. As it is currently written, IPL's Rate REP pilot program is scheduled to expire March 30, 2013.

Rate REP was originally approved in Cause No. 43623 as a three year pilot program in an IURC order dated February 2nd 2010, and became effective March 30, 2010. Most recently, Rate REP was revised by an IURC order on March 7th, 2012, in Cause No. 44018 and at page 35 states:

"If IPL wishes to continue Rate REP or make further changes to Rate REP beyond the three-year pilot program, it must comply with the 43623 Order and initiate a proceeding at least nine months prior to the end of the three-year pilot period."

Given that the Rate REP will currently expire on March 30th, 2013, the nine month deadline to file is this June 30th, 2012. Hence, the undersigned strongly urge that IPL immediately contact the IURC and indicate IPL's intent to initiate such a proceeding to 1) evaluate the Rate REP pilot program and 2) consider various options to extend and expand the current Rate REP tariff for IPL customers.

If it is not possible for IPL to file a petition to initiate such a docket before June 30th, we urge that IPL formally contact the IURC to request an extension of time to initiate such a new docket. In addition, the Commission also specifies at page 33 of the 44018 Order:

"…we will also require IPL to modify Rate REP to set aside 30% of the energy available under Rate REP to establish a reverse auction open to developers of renewable energy projects."

The reverse auction RFP was issued on June 15th, 2012, and bids are due July 13th, 2012. Therefore, it is not likely that IPL and others will know the response to the reverse auction until well after June 30th, 2012. Given this information, it would appear reasonable for IPL to request such an extension of time.

Furthermore, the undersigned organizations would like to schedule a meeting as soon as practicable with IPL and all other stakeholders, including the Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and the other parties in Cause No. 44018, to discuss Rate REP, as well as all possible options to further promote renewable energy and distributed generation including but not limited to Rate REP.

We would also like to commend IPL for its leadership in promoting customer renewable energy and distributed generation by initiating Rate REP as a pilot program.

Cordially yours,

Laura Ann Arnold, President

Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance

Kerwin Olson, Executive Director

Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana

David Menzer, Campaign Representative

Sierra Club "Beyond Coal Campaign"

Cc: John Haselden, IPL

James Atterholt, Chairman, Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

Parties to 44018:

Jason Stephenson, Counsel for IPL

David Stippler, Office of Utility Consumer Counselor

Karol Krohn, Office of Utility Consumer Counselor

Anne Becker, Counsel for Ecos Energy

Stuart Gutwein, Counsel for Bio Town Ag

David McGimpsey, Counsel for EDP Renewables

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG