Author Archives Laura Arnold

IURC Holds Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Rulemaking Workshop 9/4/12; Deadline to submit comments extended to 9/13/12

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   September 03, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Here is the agenda for the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) meeting described below: Agenda for IRP Rulemaking Workshop on 9-4-2012

It is not clear if this session will be broadcast on the Internet but if it is please visit: Watch the IURC Live

I only received word this morning (9/4/2012) that the webcast of the IRP Workshop will not be available today. SORRY.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Indiana Energy Association ("IEA") has requested a meeting to discuss aspects of the IRP Draft Proposed Rule (IURC RM #11-07 - circulated on August 2, 2012) and an extension of time to submit written comments on the IRP Draft Proposed Rule - see attached letter.  In response, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has scheduled a meeting onTuesday, September 4, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. in IURC Courtroom 222 and extended the deadline to submit written comments on the IRP Draft Proposed Rule toThursday, September 13, 2012.  IEA Letter Requesting Extension for IRP response - dtd 8-20-2012

The agenda for the September 4th meeting will be based on items for discussion from the IEA and other interested parties.  If you would like to submit a discussion item for the September 4th meeting, please email it to me by COB on Tuesday, August 28, 2012.

If you have any questions or if you need any additional information, please contact me.

Thank you for your interest and participation in this rulemaking!

Beth Krogel Roads

Assistant General Counsel - Legal Counsel, RTO/FERC Issues

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

101 W. Washington Street, Suite 1500 E

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Phone: (317) 232-2092

Fax: (317) 232-6758

Email: bkroads@urc.in.gov

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the August 2, 2012 email I received from Beth Krogel Roads:

Regarding the Revisions to the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) rule, RM #11-07, IURC staff reviewed the many comments submitted regarding the Strawman (thank you for your input!) and made changes based on those comments.  Please find attached the following:

·         Draft Proposed Rule – red-line (in pdf) RM11-07 IRP Draft Proposed Rule - red-line - 8-01-2012

·         Draft Proposed Rule – clean (in word) RM11-07 IRP Draft Proposed Rule - clean - 8-01-2012

·         IURC Response to Comments on the Strawman IURC Response to IRP Strawman Comments 8-01-2012

Please submit written comments on the attached Draft Proposed Rule by Thursday, August 30, 2012.  Extended deadline to submit written comments on the IRP Draft Proposed Rule is now Thursday, September 13, 2012. 

Utilities – please also submit your estimated annual financial impact of the proposed changes (only the changes, not the IRP rule itself) to the IRP rule by Thursday, August, 30, 2012.

Thank you for your interest and participation!

Beth Krogel Roads

Assistant General Counsel - Legal Counsel, RTO/FERC Issues

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

101 W. Washington St., Suite 1500 East

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Direct line: (317) 232-2092

Fax #: (317) 232-6758

Email: bkroads@urc.in.gov

Indiana Republican candidate for governor Mike Pence calls for nuclear power plants | Indiana | onPolitix

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 28, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   2 Comments

Pence calls for nuclear power plants | Indiana | onPolitix.

WISHTV.COM

Jim Shella

Updated: Aug 28, 2012 2:40 PM

The Republican candidate for governor proposed a comprehensive energy plan today that includes a call for nuclear power plants in Indiana.

Mike Pence says he will pursue greater use of Indiana coal when it comes to generating electricity. He also said he will fight federal government efforts to reduce the use of coal through cap and trade legislation.

Pence wants more alternative methods of energy production, too.  “I believe the time has long come for nuclear power to be a part of our conversation,” he said, “as we explore strategies for meeting our future energy needs in the Hoosier state and beyond.”

Pence says that new technology that allows for smaller nuclear plants makes the idea more feasible than it was in the ’80′s when construction of the Marble Hill Nuclear plant near Madison was halted.

Dear IndianaDG Blog Readers:

Well, I guess that Mike Pence didn't see the article below from the Financial Times last month.

Laura Ann Arnold

July 30, 2012  6:00 am

Nuclear ‘hard to justify’, says GE chief

By Pilita Clark, Environment Correspondent

Nuclear power is so expensive compared with other forms of energy that it has  become “really hard” to justify, according to the chief executive of General  Electric, one of the world’s largest suppliers of atomic equipment.

“It’s really a gas and wind world today,” said Jeff Immelt, referring to two  sources of electricity he said most countries are shifting towards as natural  gas becomes “permanently cheap”.

“When I talk to the guys who run the oil companies they say look, they’re  finding more gas all the time. It’s just hard to justify nuclear, really hard.  Gas is so cheap and at some point, really, economics rule,” Mr Immelt told the  Financial Times in an interview in London at the weekend. “So I think some  combination of gas, and either wind or solar … that’s where we see most  countries around the world going.”

Mr Immelt’s comments underline the impact on the global energy landscape of  the US  shale gas revolution, Japan’s 2011 Fukushima nuclear meltdown and falling  prices for some types of renewable power.

The shale boom has sent US natural gas prices down to 10-year lows, a trend  some analysts believe will spread elsewhere, while the nuclear industry faces  added costs and uncertainty after Fukushima.

At the same time, a 75 per cent fall in solar panel market prices in the past  three years has made solar power competitive with daytime retail electricity  prices in some countries, according to a recent  report by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, while offshore wind turbine prices  have steadily declined.

Such factors pose dilemmas for countries such as the UK, which is trying to  build new nuclear plants without public subsidy. The ruling  coalition is also split over whether to set a new target to make the  electricity sector virtually free of carbon emissions by 2030 – a plan George  Osborne, the Conservative finance minister, opposes but many Liberal Democrats  back.

Mr Immelt lent weight to the Lib Dem argument, saying GE had found existing  EU carbon targets helpful. “I think standards sometimes really drive  innovation,” he said. “To a certain extent at least, knowing what the rules are  and being able to innovate against it is not a bad thing.”

Mr Immelt played down the impact of changing energy trends on a company as  large as GE, which reported  annual profits of $13bn for 2011 (on revenues of $142bn) and sells products  for every leading source of energy, from gas and wind turbines nuclear reactors  and oil drilling gear, to gas and wind turbines.

“We’ve got them all, so in some ways when you have them all you don’t have to  be so smart about anything,” he said.

Analysts estimate GE’s nuclear revenues, from a joint venture with Japan’s Hitachi, at an estimated $1bn, or less than 1 per cent  of annual global sales.

Mr Immelt is visiting London during the Olympic Games, which GE sponsors.

The company will announce on Monday that it has made more than $1bn in sales  from Olympic host cities since 2006, including $100m from the London games,  where GE has sold several power systems, 120 electric vehicle charging stations  and thousands of lights.

As Indiana utility ends feed-in tariffs, some question motive | Midwest Energy News

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 23, 2012  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), IPL Rate REP, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

As Indiana utility ends feed-in tariffs, some question motive | Midwest Energy News.

As Indiana utility ends feed-in tariffs, some question motive

Posted on 08/23/2012 by

Workers install solar panels on the roof of an Indianapolis home in 2009. Indianapolis Power & Light may soon have more solar power installed in its service area than any other utility in the Midwest. (Photo courtesy EcoSource, Inc., used with permission)

Last month, Indianapolis Power & Light (IPL), an investor-owned utility that provides electricity to 470,000 customers in central Indiana, put out a press release boasting about its support of 30 MW of new solar developments.

The new developments would make IPL the leading provider of solar power among Midwestern utilities, the company claimed, citing Solar Electric Power Association’s 2011 utility solar rankings. IPL also touted the 300 MW of wind power already in its portfolio.

The utility’s claims were repeated in glowing news reports around central Indiana.

But what the company did not say was that the 30 MW of new solar was all that remained of an innovative feed-in tariff project that would have incorporated up to 100 MW of renewable energy into their generating mix, and is now ending—over the protests of both renewable energy developers and environmentalists.

“They did a 180-degree turn on the program,” said Laura Arnold, the president of the Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance.

“It’s really disappointing,” said Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, an Indianapolis-based environmental group. “Just three years ago, IPL was part of a broad coalition of utilities that were rightly calling public attention to climate change and the need for a comprehensive national policy,” he added. “Now IPL is withdrawing one of its only existing policies to begin the long process of cutting carbon.”

IPL did not respond to several phone calls and emails requesting comment.

Voluntary policies

Unlike many other states, Indiana does not require utilities to incorporate increasing amounts of renewable energy into their generating mix via a renewable portfolio standard, although it did institute modest voluntary goals in 2011 that aim for 10 percent renewable energy in the state by 2025. The state also has no law mandating a renewable feed-in tariff—a policy that requires utilities to provide customers that provide electricity to the grid from solar, wind or biomass a long-term rate high enough to justify their initial investment.

As a result, any feed-in tariff program by an Indiana utility is voluntary. The state’s public utility commission, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, approved IPL’s pilot feed-in tariff program, which it calls its Rate Renewable Energy Production (Rate-REP) program, in March 2010.

Under the program, as originally proposed, solar, wind and biomass developers would apply to IPL to participate, and the winning companies would build projects providing up to 100 MW of power—about 1 percent of IPL’s generating mix. In exchange, IPL would contract with the companies to pay them between 7 cents per kilowatt-hour for wind and 24 cents per kilowatt-hour for solar over a 10-year period. (IPL’s current contract terms guarantee a fixed rate for 15 years rather than ten.) IPL would charge slightly higher rates to its customers to cover the cost difference.

The policy worked: Within a year, solar and wind developers applied to build 170 MW of projects, Arnold said.

Then IPL pulled the plug.

‘Considerable return’ on investments

In a June 28 letter to the chair of the IURC explaining the company’s reasoning, William Henley, IPL’s vice president of corporate affairs, first lauded the pilot program, saying that it “had generated benefits for both customers and the Company.”

Customers, Henley wrote, would be paid for 15 years at rates high enough to cover costs and generate a “reasonable return on their investments.” IPL and its customers would benefit by “sourcing renewable energy from within IPL’s service territory at a set cost for 15 years to hedge against the potentially higher cost to comply with future renewable energy purchase mandates and to help keep the investments local.”

If it was so successful, then why did IPL terminate the program? In his letter to IURC chairman James Atterholt, Henley listed several reasons.

With 300 MW of utility-scale wind farms under contract and several MW of solar, IPL had enough renewable energy in its generation portfolio to promote clean energy and hedge against future renewable energy purchase mandates, he wrote. But today’s higher costs of renewable energy, as compared to “traditional forms of generation” such as coal, “must be balanced against other expected cost increases such as those necessary to comply with Environmental Protection Agency mandates,” Henley wrote.

Henley also maintained that costs for solar panels may soon rise, causing demand to fall.

And he said that “Rate REP has not generated the interest among customers that IPL originally expected.”

That’s highly misleading, say renewable energy advocates.

Afraid of competition?

By 2011, a year after the pilot program was launched, the company had 170 MW of proposed projects, more than the program could accommodate. Then IPL moved to end it.

“We believe they withdrew the program because the program would have been quite successful,” said Olson. “Utilities have fought solar PV for decades, especially rooftop PV. You’re generating your own power. It’s competition and loss of business,” Olson explained.

At the time of IPL’s announcement in late June, IPL had contracts for 2 MW in solar projects, and in their July 19 press release, they announced that Sunrise Energy Ventures, had won a reverse auction to supply 30 MW of solar energy to IPL’s mix. (In the reverse auction, the contractors proposed a price at which to sell electricity, and IPL chose the lowest bidder.

Dean Leischow, managing director of Sunrise, told Midwest Energy News the company plans to build three 10 MW, 70-acre solar farms in fields on the outskirts of Indianapolis. IPL has agreed to pay the company a fixed rate for 15 years.

As a result, IPL could lead all Midwest utilities in the amount of solar power generated in their service territory, according to Solar Electric Power Association’s 2011 utility solar rankings, IPL maintained in its press release.

That sounds about right, said Leischow, of Sunrise Energy Ventures.

“The Midwest is not a hotbed for renewable energy, so that would make it fairly easy for IPL to take a lead position. I think IPL going out with 30 MW puts them in the lead,” he said. “It’s an exciting project for Indiana and an exciting project for us, and I’m looking forward to getting it rolling.”

And Ken Zagzebski, IPL’s president and CEO, also touted the deal.

“IPL’s interest in solar energy is part of our commitment to a more diversified portfolio of power generation that includes appropriate renewable sources that allow us to provide safe, reliable energy at some of the most affordable residential prices in the nation,” Zabzebski said, according to the company’s July 19 press release.

But Olson had a very different take on the situation. “There’s lots of greenwashing going on,” he said.

CNN Reports: Obama policy could put Indiana solar ‘poster boy’ Bill Keith out of business; What should be our US solar manufacturing policy?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 23, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   2 Comments

Dear IndianaDG Readers:

This story aired last night on CNN's program Anderson Cooper 360. This topic, namely the US tariffs imposed on Chinese solar panels, is a controversial and emotional topic right now within the solar industry. I post this story to encourage and foster dialogue on the broader topic of the future of US solar panel manufacturing and its impact on our state of Indiana.

This debate started last fall and was reported in this blog as a battle between two segments of the solar industry. See these past blog posts:

So which side are you on?

Laura Ann Arnold

By Kathleen Johnston and Drew Griffin, CNN Special Investigations Unit
updated 7:18 AM EDT, Thu August 23, 2012

St. John, Indiana (CNN) -- With just his dream, determination and hard work, Bill Keith started a solar fan business nearly a decade ago out of his garage in northwest Indiana. The one-time roofer simply wanted to make enough money to care for his family and to create a ripple effect for other workers, particularly in this economically depressed area outside Chicago.

Keith vowed to create his solar attic fans entirely out of parts made in the United States.

Using only the sun's energy, the fan pumps hot air out of the attic -- lowering cooling bills -- and doesn't have to be in direct sunlight to work. His first year, Keith said he barely made enough to scrape by -- about $39,000 in sales.

"It wasn't enough to cover expenses," Keith recalled.

But he stuck with it and his promise to buy American parts. Keith's company, SunRise Solar, steadily grew to the point that he couldn't keep up with the influx of orders. He looked around for companies that could help him manufacture the fans, concentrating his search in his own backyard. He eventually found a company that could help and needed the extra work about 90 miles away in Warsaw, Indiana.

He bought molded plastic in Indiana as well as fasteners, nuts, bolts and steel. Wire for the fans came from workers in New Jersey, while the motors were from Pennsylvania and Chicago. Even his cardboard boxes were manufactured in nearby South Bend.

Keith had achieved his own small part of the American dream: He became a self-made small-business owner. And in 2008, his success attracted the attention of the soon-to-be next president of the United States, Barack Obama. That year, he got an unexpected call from a representative of the new administration.

"He said he was with the Obama transition team looking for small companies," Keith recalled. He later met with the man who told Keith, "we want to interview you, vet you."

Please visit the CNN story to watch these additional CNN story videos.  http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/politics/obama-solar-poster-boy/index.html?iref=allsearch
Romney accused of hypocrisy for Solyndra

Durbin: 'Wrong' to condemn Solyndra loan

Renting solar panels to save money

"Guy sat right there talking with me, said 'I really love your story and I'm going to push it up the rank,'" Keith said.

And that's exactly what happened. Shortly after he was inaugurated, Obama held a town hall meeting in the economically devastated city of Elkhart, Indiana. Keith and his wife were asked to come and -- prodded by his wife -- he stood up and told the president about his solar business. He asked Obama what he planned to do to encourage small business owners like himself.

The question turned Keith into a White House solar superstar. ABC, CNBC and other media came calling to tell the story of the roofer who built a solar company out of his garage -- and he did so without a government handout.

"Move over Joe the Plumber," one blog headline declared after his Elkhart appearance. "There's a new poster child for hard-working Americans -- and he's green."

Keith's success story provided good publicity for the White House which called again and again, using Keith to underscore the Obama administration's goal of pushing America towards new sources of clean energy.

"'Can you come to Washington? Can you come to Philly? Biden doing this,'" Keith said of the numerous requests he received from the administration.

There's the photo of him with the president and Vice President Joe Biden in Kokomo, another Indiana city hard hit by the recession, as well as an appearance with Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and many others.

Keith's story resonated with groups of all political stripes. Republicans got in on the act when then Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar named him "an energy patriot" and the GOP-leaning U.S. Chamber of Commerce cited his work. Environmentalists also contacted him, and featured him in one appearance after another.

Strange bedfellows, perhaps, but it was a feelgood story of what one American could do in a time when the recession was strangling so many.

"They were continually inviting me to these things called 'advocacy days' where they wanted me to meet with senators and congressmen," Keith said, noting that he attended many with his wife.

At these events, lawmakers talked about "how I created a solar product, how it's good for the environment, for business," he said.

"(I) won't say they were putting words in my mouth but they had a lot of talking points," Keith said. "I was happy to do it from that point of view. It is friendly to the environment; it is creating jobs."

Bill Keith with Rep. Pete Visclosky, D-Ind., pictured on the left, and Sen. Dick Lugar, R-Ind., on the right
Bill Keith with Rep. Pete Visclosky, D-Ind., pictured on the left, and Sen. Dick Lugar, R-Ind., on the right

It also was good advertising for Keith, who could never have afforded the publicity these appearances offered. Orders for the fans, which retail at about $500, came pouring in from places as far away as Hawaii.

"It grew to where our peak was $2 million (in revenues)," he said, referring to sales in 2009.

SunRise Solar started exporting fans all over the world. While his home-based business employs only about 21 direct and indirect employees, it brought a much-needed economic boost to an area of the country hard hit by the recession.

Today, Keith's solar star appears to be on a collision course with another Obama policy that may put him out of business. The irony is not lost on Keith: A man whose profile and company soared because of the administration's energy policy is now falling apart because of a new Obama anti-dumping policy involving China.

While 95 percent of Keith's fans are American-made, he has yet to find a U.S. company that can make the small customized solar panels that make his fans run. It's not that he hasn't tried. He initially used a company in Michigan but they stopped manufacturing the kind of panels he needed. Then Keith turned to a New York company but the quality was so bad that he was replacing the defective parts faster than he could sell the fans.

Over the years he begged environmental groups as well as the Commerce Department for help in finding an American company that could make the key solar component. Reluctantly, he agreed to purchase them from a major company in the United States, which bought their panels from another country and then had them customized in Hong Kong. Eventually that manufacturer told Keith to deal with the Hong Kong customizer directly.

Keith said the U.S. Customs Department has accused him of using Chinese-made solar panels, in violation of a tough import policy adopted in May at the behest of major U.S. solar companies. The policy is intended to thwart China from undercutting prices and flooding the U.S. market with cheaper solar panels. The U.S. Department of Commerce is currently reviewing the policy, and is scheduled to make a determination in the fall.

Keith denies that any of part of his solar fans are produced in China, but he admits he can't totally prove it. According to Keith, the owner of the Hong Kong company that customizes his solar cells has stated in an affadavit that it buys the cells from the United States, Taiwan and Germany. But Keith worries that testimony won't be good enough.

"The solar panel tariff is a broad-reaching tariff. In my estimation it shouldn't be geared toward small niche markets like mine," Keith said.

Unless he can show specific manufacturing documentation by August 29, Keith said he could be fined as much as 250 percent on his solar panels -- an effective rate of $270,000.

If that anti-dumping fine is levied, Keith said he will have to shutter his business.

"These guys are going to put me out of business," Keith said. "I don't have any help. I've been trying to get help, no one can help me."

The solar panel tariff ...shouldn't be geared toward small niche markets like mine. Bill Keith, owner, SunRise Solar

Keith said he has never received government financial assistance and is taxed in the 40 percent bracket. He said he has sat by and watched companies like the now bankrupt Solyndra run through taxpayers' money and not return on the government's investment.

He said he doesn't want a handout -- just a helping hand. So he went back to the well one more time, pleading with Greg Nelson, deputy director of the White House Office of Public Engagement who Keith said had been his contact with the Obama administration.

Under the subject line his e-mail to Nelson, Keith wrote, "Hanging on for life here."

"Can you help me before I have to close my doors and let everyone go?" Keith asked in the e-mail. "Please ... I'm pleading with you."

Nelson responded, "Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I don't know what is possible, but let me talk to a few folks asap. Will circle back soon."

That was nearly a month ago and Keith is still waiting. CNN sent three e-mails to the White House asking about Keith's situation, and received a reply from a spokesman late Wednesday afternoon. The spokesman stated that the tariff "highlights the degree to which solar panel manufacturers have faced unfair competition from countries like China" and the president's move to impose a tax on Chinese-made goods is a way to establish "a level playing field with China for American businesses and workers." The reply did not address Keith's situation.

"When Obama came in office, there were a lot of small business owners who said, 'Hey maybe he'll help break barriers and help owners' or he says he will, but it never trickles down that far to help us," Keith said. "Maybe it's because we don't have big budgets to donate to campaigns. I don't know. I'm just trying to run my company."

CNN's Sara Anwar contributed to this story.

DC Circuit Court strikes down Cross State Air Pollution Rule. Tri-state health impact will be negative.

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 22, 2012  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

DC Circuit Court strikes down Cross State Air Pollution Rule. Tri-state health impact will be negative..

August 21, 2012-by John Blair, valleywatch.net editor

It is truly a sad day for people in the tri-state of Illinois, Indiana and Kentucky. The District Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington struck down an EPA rule designed to improve the health of citizens of this region and all of the eastern half of the nation. The judges were split 2-1 with an angry 44 page dissent from Judge Judith Rogers.

Called, the Cross State Air Pollution Rule, the rule was finalized in July 2011 to force coal burning power plants to install pollution controls for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides that, in turn, would significantly reduce the formation of fine particle pollution in the form of sulfates and nitrates across much of the United States.

When EPA published the rule it said it would result in a 73% reduction in SO2 emissions by 73% and NOX emissions by 54% improving the overall health of more than 240 million Americans.

“This decision allows harmful power plant air pollution to continue to aggravate major health problems and foul up our air. This is a loss for all of us, but especially for those living downwind from major polluters,” said John Walke, clean air director at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“This rule would have prevented thousands of premature deaths and saved tens of billions of dollars a year in health costs, but two judges blocked that from happening and forced EPA to further delay long overdue health safeguards for Americans.”

“The EPA can – and should – immediately appeal this decision. The dissenting judge correctly follows the Clean Air Act and prior rulings by this court. The majority opinion is an outlier at odds with the court’s own rulings as well as the Clean Air Act,” Walke said.

The same court with differing judges had already struck down the Clean Air Interstate Rule in 2008 but on both occasions told EPA to continue acting as if the CAIR rule was still in effect.

The ruling can be downloaded at: http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/19346B280C78405C85257A61004DC0E5/$file/11-1302-1390314.pdf

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG