Author Archives Laura Arnold

3 Duke Energy Indiana Rate Increase Field Hearings–Carmel, Terre Haute and New Albany

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 22, 2019  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Duke field hearings

Duke Energy proposes a 19% rate increase for residential electricity customers

 

Emily Hopkins and Sarah Bowman, Indianapolis Star Published 11:29 a.m. ET July 2, 2019 | Updated 11:35 a.m. ET July 2, 2019

Duke Energy is asking to hike residential electricity bills by about $23 a month, its first appeal to state regulators for such action in nearly two decades.

The largest electric utility in the state of Indiana filed its request with the Indiana Utilities Regulatory Commission Tuesday morning. It is asking to increase its annual revenue by approximately $395 million.

This story will be updated.

The proposed increase is driven by investments to serve a growing customer base, generate cleaner electricity and improve the reliability of electric service, according to a Duke Energy press release.

Rates for all customer groups would increase by about 15% if the proposal is approved. Residential customers would see an increase of about 19%, or about an additional $276 per year.

Consumer advocates balked at the increase.

"We are not sure where Duke Energy thinks many residents will find an extra $23 a month," said Kerwin Olson of the Citizens Action Coalition. "In our view they are taking food off people’s tables with these increases, and why? Is Duke Energy under-earning? Are they not collecting enough money?"

That is a question that Olson, state utility regulators, and the Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, which represents ratepayer interests, will be trying to answer.

Duke's future plans for coal plants

Duke's rate case filing comes days after the filing of their latest integrated resource plan, which lays out how the utility expects it will generate electricity over the next 20 years.

New projections in the plan suggest retiring seven coal-fired units a combined 61 years earlier in order to diversify their generation in the face of potential regulation of carbon dioxide emissions and the decreasing cost of renewable energy technology.

About 90 percent of the power Duke produced in Indiana in 2018 was coal-fired. The utility intends to supplement the retired coal-fired capacity primarily with natural gas mixed with some wind and solar energy.

However, several critics point out that Duke's projections for the future are "sorely lacking" in renewable energy and battery storage. The combination of solar and wind Duke said it expects to add by 2037 is less than the installed capacity of its current coal-fired Gibson plant.

"So you are talking about a sliver of their system," said Grant Smith, senior energy policy adviser with the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Environmental Working Group. "They are essentially replacing coal with natural gas and keeping wind and solar on the fringes."

Duke says natural gas works to replace coal

Advocates say they are also perplexed by Duke's decision to request approval for the construction of a large natural gas plant months after a similar proposal by Vectren was rejected by state regulators.

Last year, Vectren proposed replacing part of its 100% coal-fired generation with a large natural gas plant. But the petition was struck down by state regulators, who said there was a "lack of evidence" that Vectren "made a serious effort to determine the price and availability of renewables."

The commission further cited the potential financial risk to customers who would be saddled with paying for the plant over a 30-year period during a time when the energy industry continues to rapidly evolve.

Vectren's plant would have provided 850 megawatts of natural gas power to its customers. Duke is asking for a 1,240 megawatt plant.

Since the rejection, Vectren has opened an all-source request for proposals to examine the viability of alternative energy mixes.

Duke's announcement also comes just under a year after NIPSCO, a northern Indiana utility, announced its intentions to retire all its coal plants in favor of renewable energy. NIPSCO's plan projects that more than half of the electricity it produces will come from wind, solar and battery storage by 2023.

The majority of Duke's retirements coal-fired plant retirements are slated for 2028 or later.

Coal-to-gas plant would become part of customers' base rate

Also included in the rate case would be a change in how ratepayers pay for Duke's controversial coal-to-gas plant in Knox County. The Edwardsport project was nearly $2 billion overbudget and has underperformed since it first opened in 2013, having repeated outages and costly repairs.

Currently, the average Duke Energy customer pays about $14 per month for the Edwardsport plant in their monthly bill through a "tracker," which allows a utility to recover costs outside of the rigorous regulatory process involved in a rate case.

Now, Duke is looking to incorporate nearly $100 million each year for operations and maintenance on the plant as part of its rate base. To do that, the utility must convince state regulators that the project is useful and in the public interest, not the expensive boondoggle that many view it to be.

Emily Hopkins and Sarah Bowman cover the environment for IndyStar. Contact Emily at (317) 444-6409 or emily.hopkins@indystar.com. Follow them on Twitter: @_thetextfiles. Call Sarah at (317) 444-6129. Follow her on Twitter and Facebook: @IndyStarSarah.

IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.


Documents you may wish to review about the Duke Energy Indiana rate increase request (Cause No. 45253)

45253 DEI Verified Petition 070219 (1)

45253 - DEI - Direct Testimony of Stan C Pinegar 070219 Stan Pinegar is the President of Duke Energy Indiana.

45253 - DEI - Direct Testimony of Andrew S. Ritch 070219 (1) Andrew Ritch discusses their proposed renewable energy projects.

Summary of proposed Duke Energy Indiana rate increases by customer class.

DEI rate increase table

If you are interested in more details, please see this six-page summary:

Duke Rate Case -- Index of Issues and Requests

USDA Announces Indiana REAP Grants

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 22, 2019  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

USDA logo

USDA Invests in Energy Efficiency Improvements and Renewable Energy Systems to Help Farmers, Rural Businesses and Ag Producers Lower Energy Costs

(INDIANAPOLIS) – Rural Development State Director for Indiana Michael Dora today announced that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is awarding 18 grants through the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) for projects throughout Indiana to reduce energy costs for farmers, ag producers, and rural-based businesses and institutions.

“USDA is committed to increasing economic development in Indiana’s rural communities,” said Dora. “The projects will use federal funds to help lower energy costs and improve the business’ bottom line.”

Dora’s announcement is in coordination with Rural Business-Cooperative Service Administrator Bette Brand’s announcement that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is awarding $9.3 million in grants for projects in 49 states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to reduce energy costs. Congress appropriated $50 million for REAP grants and loan guarantees in the fiscal year 2019. USDA will make additional funding announcements in the REAP program in coming weeks.

Recipients can use REAP funding for a variety of needs, such as conducting energy audits and installing renewable energy systems such as biomass, geothermal, hydropower and solar.  Funds also can be used to make energy efficiency improvements to heating, ventilation and cooling systems; insulation; and lighting and refrigeration. Listed below are a few examples of how farmers, rural business owners, and institutions are making investments in their operations through REAP.

The 18 successful recipients in Indiana are:

  • Adams Swine Farms, LLC in Berne will use a $15,318 grant to purchase and install a grain dryer. The farm is a family-owned farming corporation that raises swine. This project is expected to lower the farm’s electricity costs by $5,132 annually.
  • JS Farms, Inc. in Delphi will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a grain dryer. The farm is a family-owned grain farming corporation.  This project is expected to lower the farm’s electricity costs by $4,992 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 20 homes for a year.
  • Darrel G. Erb, operates a family farm that raises oilseed and grain in Francisville, will use a $12,441grant to purchase and install a grain dryer. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $6,840 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 13 homes for a year.
  • Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC in Mount Vernon will use a $1,669 grant to purchase and install LED lighting throughout the building.  Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC is a small business that leases commercial buildings with leased office space to tenants for commercial uses. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $2,406 annually.
  • Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC in Mount Vernon will use a $14,109 grant to purchase and install a 22-kW solar array.  Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC is a small business that leases commercial buildings with leased office space to tenants for commercial uses. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $4,128 annually. The energy saved is enough to power three homes for a year.
  • East-Terra Hardware Supply, LLC (dba East-Terra Plastics) in Fayette County will use a $13,429 grant to replace mercury vapor lighting with high-efficiency LEDs. Established in 2016, East-Terra Plastics recycles post-consumer and post-industrial plastics. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $10,832 annually. The energy saved is enough to power ten homes for a year.
  • Bowman & Bowman Farms, Inc. in Waterloo will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a 37-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $8,475 annually. The energy saved is enough to power four homes for a year.
  • Chalfant Farms, Inc. in Randolph County will use a $10,500 grant to purchase and install an 18-kW solar array. The farm is a family-owned farm. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $2,867 annually.
  • D&D Electric in Etna Green will use a $14,750 grant to purchase and install a 28-kW solar array.  D&D Electric is a family-owned business. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $4,282 annually. The energy saved is enough to power three homes for a year.
  • Steven Doerner, operates a family-owned farm in Oakland City, will use an $8.082 grant to purchase and install an 18.2-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $3,483 annually.
  • F & K Construction a rural small business in Flora will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a 56-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $8,169 annually. The energy saved is enough to power seven homes per year.
  • Furrer Crop Farms, a family-owned farm in Wolcott, will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a 37-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $7,611 annually.
  • Hiatt M & B Farms, LLC, a family-owned farm located in Randolph County, will use a $10,481 grant to purchase and install a 33-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $3,773 annually.
  • Daniel K. Larney, a farmer in Gibson County, will use a $3,024 grant to purchase and install an 8-k solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $1,315 annually.
  • Pamela Milhollin, an agricultural producer who operates a family-owned farm located in rural Randolph County, will use a $7,306 grant to purchase and install an 18-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $2,054 annually.
  • N&L Pork, Inc., a woman-owned business in Knox, will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install an 111-kW solar array.  This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $15,017 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 14 homes a year.
  • Premier Roofing & Construction, LLC in Nappanee will use a $14,476 grant to purchase and install a 12-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $8,175 annually.
  • Treat’s Squire Shop a rural small business in Plymouth will use a $1,500 grant to purchase and install LED lighting. The project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $4,081 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 5 homes a year.

In April 2017, President Donald J. Trump established the Interagency Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to identify legislative, regulatory and policy changes that could promote agriculture and prosperity in rural communities. In January 2018, Secretary Perdue presented the Task Force’s findings to President Trump. These findings included 31 recommendations to align the federal government with state, local and tribal governments to take advantage of opportunities that exist in rural America. Supporting the rural workforce was a cornerstone recommendation of the task force.

To view the report in its entirety, please view the Report to the President of the United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB). In addition, to view the categories of the recommendations, please view the Rural Prosperity infographic (PDF, 190 KB).

USDA Rural Development provides loans and grants to help expand economic opportunities and create jobs in rural areas. This assistance supports infrastructure improvements; business development; housing; community facilities such as schools, public safety, and health care; and high-speed internet access in rural areas. For more information, visit www.rd.usda.gov.

21st Century Energy Policy Development Task Force 8/26/19 Agenda

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 21, 2019  /   Posted in 2018 Indiana General Assembly, 2019 Indiana General Assembly, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

21st Century Energy Policy Development Task Force

Rep. Edmond Soliday (R-Valpariso), Co Chair

Sen. Eric Koch (R-Bedford), Co Chair

Sen. James Merritt (R-Indianapolis)

Sen. David Niezgodski (D-South Bend)

Sen. Mark Stoops (D-Bloomington)

Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville)

Rep. Ethan Manning (R-Denver)

Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington)

J.P. Carvallo

William Fine

John Graham

Kay Pashos

Philip Powell

Wallace Tyner (recently deceased, should be replaced by Gov. Holcomb)

Donna Walker

Authority: IC 2-5-45

MEETING AGENDA

 

Date: August 26, 2019

Time: 10:00 AM

Place: State House, 200 W. Washington St., House Chamber

City: Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Meeting Number: 1

WATCH LIVE

http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2019/meeting/watchlive/15672071-f1f3-43d7-8ced-2731e5ae740c/

(1)   10:00 a.m.-2:45 p.m.: Desired Outcomes and Issues

 

(A)  Task Force members (10:00-10:30 a.m.)

(B)  Industry representatives (10: 30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.)

  • 10:30 a.m.: Indiana Energy Association (IEA)
  • 10:45 a.m.: Indiana Municipal Power Agency (IMPA)
  • 11:00 a.m.: Indiana Electric Cooperatives
  • 11:15 a.m.: Indiana Coal Council
  • 11:30 a.m.: Renewable energy interests
  • 11:45 a.m.: American Petroleum Institute

12:00-1:00 p.m.: Lunch

 

(C)  Consumer representatives (1:00-2:15 p.m.)

  • 1:00 p.m.: Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC)
  • 1:15 p.m.: Citizens Action Coalition (CAC)
  • 1:30 p.m.: Indiana Chamber of Commerce
  • 1:45 p.m.: NAACP
  • 2:00 p.m.: Hoosier Environmental Council

(D)  Regulators (2:15-2:45 p.m.)

  • 2:15 p.m.: Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC)
  • 2:30 p.m.: Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM)

(2)  2:45-3:45 p.m.: Roles and Responsibilities

 

(A) IURC (2:45-3:00 p.m.)

(B)   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC); North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) (3:00-3:15 p.m.)

(C)     PJM Interconnection (3:15-3:30 p.m.)

(D)   Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) (3:30-3:45 p.m.)

(3)  3:45 p.m.: Public Testimony

 

** All times listed above include time for questions and comments by Task Force members.**

** Times allotted are subject to change at the discretion of the Co-Chairmen.**

Jay County (IN): Wind and solar rules advance

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 20, 2019  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments

Jay County

Location of Jay County, Indiana

From The Commercial Review Friday, August 9, 2019

Wind and solar rules advance

By RAY COONEY

An updated wind farm ordinance and a new solar ordinance are moving forward.

Jay County Plan Commission on Thursday OK’d minor changes and voted to advance the proposed ordinances that have been in the works for more than a year.

Plan commission also OK’d a variety of other additions and amendments to the county zoning ordinance.

The new ordinances and changes still have to go through several steps before going into effect.

They will be subject to a public hearing — it is scheduled for 7 p.m. Sept. 12 in the auditorium at Jay County Courthouse — before the plan commission votes.

If passed, they would then move on to Jay County Commissioners for final approval.

Changes to the proposed wind farm and solar farm ordinances OK’d Thursday included updated language in the road use agreement noting that equipment such as transition lines would not be allowed to be constructed in any county right-of-way or easement without prior written approval.

The new wind farm ordinance, which was first presented in March after being hashed out by a seven-member study committee, is twice as long as the seven-page original that was put in place more than a decade ago.

Among the proposed changes are the following turbine setback increases and additions:

  • 1.5 times the height of the turbine away from the property line of non-participating landowners, up from the current 350 feet or 1.1 times the height of the turbine.
  • 1,500 feet from residential dwellings for non-participating landowners, up from the current 1,000 feet.
  • 1,500 feet from any church, school, business or public building. S
  • One-half mile from any nature preserve, park or recreational use area.

The updated ordinance also notes that any buried cable must be at least 5 feet deep, with warning mesh at 3 feet. Cables would also have to be marked at road crossings, creeks, river beds and property lines.

Also addressed is shadow flicker — the shadow produced by the rotating blades — with a requirement that the wind farm operator must take “reasonable steps” to minimize the impact upon receiving a written complaint from a landowner.

Plan commission, via the study committee, has been reviewing the county’s wind farm ordinance since last summer after Jay County Commissioners followed its recommendation to impose a three-year moratorium on such developments in response to opposition of Scout Clean Energy’s proposal for Bitter Ridge Wind Farm. (The construction process is getting underway this week on that project, which moved forward under existing rules. It is scheduled to go online in September 2020.)

The most extensive discussion on the solar ordinance Thursday was regarding the section regarding whether or not to allow those who install personal solar energy systems to sell energy to offsite users. The proposed ordinance now states that power created from such systems is for “on-site use only by the owner.” Language addressing net metering — connecting to a public-utility power grid to transfer surplus power — was deleted.

The other significant addition was setting a permit fee of $1,750 per megawatt hour, which matches the wind farm ordinance.

Proposed changes to other sections of the county zoning ordinance that were advanced Thursday include:

  • Deleting a section of the ordinance regarding urban residential districts, none of which exist in Jay County.
  • A requirement that all new homes must have more than 950 square feet of occupied space. (The current ordinance does not include size requirements.)
  • The addition of a section about conflicts of interest, the language of which mirrors state code.
  • An increase in setbacks for ponds to 75 feet from a road right of way, up from the current 50 feet.
  • Clarification that the sections of the ordinance directly addressing small wind energy systems, commercial wind farms and solar energy systems supersede other sections of the ordinance when addressing such developments.

Copies of the proposed changes to the Jay County Zoning Ordinance are as follows:

Section 217 Wind Farms Standards - Sept 2019

Section 218 Small Wind Energy - Sept 2019

Section 219 Solar Energy Standards - Sept 2019

 

 

US DOE: Farmer’s Guide to Going Solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 12, 2019  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments
Lanai solar farm sheep
Photographer: Merrill Smith

US DOE: Farmer's Guide to Going Solar

A growing number of farms and agricultural businesses are looking to solar to power their daily operations. Thanks in part to the Solar Energy Technologies Office's investments, the cost of going solar has declined, enabling more installations across the country. Consider these questions to help you determine what’s best for you and your farm.

See https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/farmers-guide-going-solar

Here are the questions this US DOE website addresses:

  • Will solar modules contaminate the soil underneath or around them?
  • Can solar modules change the microclimate underneath the modules and worsen invasive species, fungal, nematode or other pest problems?
  • Will solar modules heat up and dry out vegetation or crops under the modules?
  • Can wild animals like antelope or elk graze under solar modules?
  • Can domesticated animals like sheep or cattle graze at ground-mounted solar facilities?
  • What is the impact of solar modules on birds or other wildlife species?
  • Can you grow native vegetation or pollinator habitat underneath solar modules?
  • Will solar modules drive up the price of food?
  • Is it safe to spray agrochemicals near solar modules?
  • Can solar modules power my irrigation equipment?
  • I lease my farmland. Can I still install solar PV?
  • I can’t drive my tractor through or around solar modules. Are there ways I can still install solar?
  • I need to burn my fields every year. Can I still install solar PV?
  • My farmland floods in the spring. Can I still install solar PV?
  • What are the impacts of dust on the performance of solar PV modules?
  • Can my land be converted back to agricultural land after the life of the solar system?
  • What are the benefits of co-locating solar and crop production?
  • Are there trade-offs of raising solar modules to accommodate crop production?
Copyright 2013 IndianaDG