Author Archives Laura Arnold

USDA Announces Indiana REAP Grants

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 22, 2019  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

USDA logo

USDA Invests in Energy Efficiency Improvements and Renewable Energy Systems to Help Farmers, Rural Businesses and Ag Producers Lower Energy Costs

(INDIANAPOLIS) – Rural Development State Director for Indiana Michael Dora today announced that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is awarding 18 grants through the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) for projects throughout Indiana to reduce energy costs for farmers, ag producers, and rural-based businesses and institutions.

“USDA is committed to increasing economic development in Indiana’s rural communities,” said Dora. “The projects will use federal funds to help lower energy costs and improve the business’ bottom line.”

Dora’s announcement is in coordination with Rural Business-Cooperative Service Administrator Bette Brand’s announcement that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is awarding $9.3 million in grants for projects in 49 states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to reduce energy costs. Congress appropriated $50 million for REAP grants and loan guarantees in the fiscal year 2019. USDA will make additional funding announcements in the REAP program in coming weeks.

Recipients can use REAP funding for a variety of needs, such as conducting energy audits and installing renewable energy systems such as biomass, geothermal, hydropower and solar.  Funds also can be used to make energy efficiency improvements to heating, ventilation and cooling systems; insulation; and lighting and refrigeration. Listed below are a few examples of how farmers, rural business owners, and institutions are making investments in their operations through REAP.

The 18 successful recipients in Indiana are:

  • Adams Swine Farms, LLC in Berne will use a $15,318 grant to purchase and install a grain dryer. The farm is a family-owned farming corporation that raises swine. This project is expected to lower the farm’s electricity costs by $5,132 annually.
  • JS Farms, Inc. in Delphi will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a grain dryer. The farm is a family-owned grain farming corporation.  This project is expected to lower the farm’s electricity costs by $4,992 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 20 homes for a year.
  • Darrel G. Erb, operates a family farm that raises oilseed and grain in Francisville, will use a $12,441grant to purchase and install a grain dryer. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $6,840 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 13 homes for a year.
  • Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC in Mount Vernon will use a $1,669 grant to purchase and install LED lighting throughout the building.  Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC is a small business that leases commercial buildings with leased office space to tenants for commercial uses. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $2,406 annually.
  • Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC in Mount Vernon will use a $14,109 grant to purchase and install a 22-kW solar array.  Home Sweet Home Properties, LLC is a small business that leases commercial buildings with leased office space to tenants for commercial uses. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $4,128 annually. The energy saved is enough to power three homes for a year.
  • East-Terra Hardware Supply, LLC (dba East-Terra Plastics) in Fayette County will use a $13,429 grant to replace mercury vapor lighting with high-efficiency LEDs. Established in 2016, East-Terra Plastics recycles post-consumer and post-industrial plastics. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $10,832 annually. The energy saved is enough to power ten homes for a year.
  • Bowman & Bowman Farms, Inc. in Waterloo will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a 37-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $8,475 annually. The energy saved is enough to power four homes for a year.
  • Chalfant Farms, Inc. in Randolph County will use a $10,500 grant to purchase and install an 18-kW solar array. The farm is a family-owned farm. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $2,867 annually.
  • D&D Electric in Etna Green will use a $14,750 grant to purchase and install a 28-kW solar array.  D&D Electric is a family-owned business. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $4,282 annually. The energy saved is enough to power three homes for a year.
  • Steven Doerner, operates a family-owned farm in Oakland City, will use an $8.082 grant to purchase and install an 18.2-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $3,483 annually.
  • F & K Construction a rural small business in Flora will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a 56-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $8,169 annually. The energy saved is enough to power seven homes per year.
  • Furrer Crop Farms, a family-owned farm in Wolcott, will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install a 37-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $7,611 annually.
  • Hiatt M & B Farms, LLC, a family-owned farm located in Randolph County, will use a $10,481 grant to purchase and install a 33-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $3,773 annually.
  • Daniel K. Larney, a farmer in Gibson County, will use a $3,024 grant to purchase and install an 8-k solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $1,315 annually.
  • Pamela Milhollin, an agricultural producer who operates a family-owned farm located in rural Randolph County, will use a $7,306 grant to purchase and install an 18-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the farm’s energy costs by $2,054 annually.
  • N&L Pork, Inc., a woman-owned business in Knox, will use a $20,000 grant to purchase and install an 111-kW solar array.  This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $15,017 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 14 homes a year.
  • Premier Roofing & Construction, LLC in Nappanee will use a $14,476 grant to purchase and install a 12-kW solar array. This project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $8,175 annually.
  • Treat’s Squire Shop a rural small business in Plymouth will use a $1,500 grant to purchase and install LED lighting. The project is expected to lower the business’ energy costs by $4,081 annually. The energy saved is enough to power 5 homes a year.

In April 2017, President Donald J. Trump established the Interagency Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to identify legislative, regulatory and policy changes that could promote agriculture and prosperity in rural communities. In January 2018, Secretary Perdue presented the Task Force’s findings to President Trump. These findings included 31 recommendations to align the federal government with state, local and tribal governments to take advantage of opportunities that exist in rural America. Supporting the rural workforce was a cornerstone recommendation of the task force.

To view the report in its entirety, please view the Report to the President of the United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB). In addition, to view the categories of the recommendations, please view the Rural Prosperity infographic (PDF, 190 KB).

USDA Rural Development provides loans and grants to help expand economic opportunities and create jobs in rural areas. This assistance supports infrastructure improvements; business development; housing; community facilities such as schools, public safety, and health care; and high-speed internet access in rural areas. For more information, visit www.rd.usda.gov.

21st Century Energy Policy Development Task Force 8/26/19 Agenda

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 21, 2019  /   Posted in 2018 Indiana General Assembly, 2019 Indiana General Assembly, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

21st Century Energy Policy Development Task Force

Rep. Edmond Soliday (R-Valpariso), Co Chair

Sen. Eric Koch (R-Bedford), Co Chair

Sen. James Merritt (R-Indianapolis)

Sen. David Niezgodski (D-South Bend)

Sen. Mark Stoops (D-Bloomington)

Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville)

Rep. Ethan Manning (R-Denver)

Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington)

J.P. Carvallo

William Fine

John Graham

Kay Pashos

Philip Powell

Wallace Tyner (recently deceased, should be replaced by Gov. Holcomb)

Donna Walker

Authority: IC 2-5-45

MEETING AGENDA

 

Date: August 26, 2019

Time: 10:00 AM

Place: State House, 200 W. Washington St., House Chamber

City: Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Meeting Number: 1

WATCH LIVE

http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2019/meeting/watchlive/15672071-f1f3-43d7-8ced-2731e5ae740c/

(1)   10:00 a.m.-2:45 p.m.: Desired Outcomes and Issues

 

(A)  Task Force members (10:00-10:30 a.m.)

(B)  Industry representatives (10: 30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.)

  • 10:30 a.m.: Indiana Energy Association (IEA)
  • 10:45 a.m.: Indiana Municipal Power Agency (IMPA)
  • 11:00 a.m.: Indiana Electric Cooperatives
  • 11:15 a.m.: Indiana Coal Council
  • 11:30 a.m.: Renewable energy interests
  • 11:45 a.m.: American Petroleum Institute

12:00-1:00 p.m.: Lunch

 

(C)  Consumer representatives (1:00-2:15 p.m.)

  • 1:00 p.m.: Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC)
  • 1:15 p.m.: Citizens Action Coalition (CAC)
  • 1:30 p.m.: Indiana Chamber of Commerce
  • 1:45 p.m.: NAACP
  • 2:00 p.m.: Hoosier Environmental Council

(D)  Regulators (2:15-2:45 p.m.)

  • 2:15 p.m.: Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC)
  • 2:30 p.m.: Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM)

(2)  2:45-3:45 p.m.: Roles and Responsibilities

 

(A) IURC (2:45-3:00 p.m.)

(B)   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC); North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) (3:00-3:15 p.m.)

(C)     PJM Interconnection (3:15-3:30 p.m.)

(D)   Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) (3:30-3:45 p.m.)

(3)  3:45 p.m.: Public Testimony

 

** All times listed above include time for questions and comments by Task Force members.**

** Times allotted are subject to change at the discretion of the Co-Chairmen.**

Jay County (IN): Wind and solar rules advance

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 20, 2019  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments

Jay County

Location of Jay County, Indiana

From The Commercial Review Friday, August 9, 2019

Wind and solar rules advance

By RAY COONEY

An updated wind farm ordinance and a new solar ordinance are moving forward.

Jay County Plan Commission on Thursday OK’d minor changes and voted to advance the proposed ordinances that have been in the works for more than a year.

Plan commission also OK’d a variety of other additions and amendments to the county zoning ordinance.

The new ordinances and changes still have to go through several steps before going into effect.

They will be subject to a public hearing — it is scheduled for 7 p.m. Sept. 12 in the auditorium at Jay County Courthouse — before the plan commission votes.

If passed, they would then move on to Jay County Commissioners for final approval.

Changes to the proposed wind farm and solar farm ordinances OK’d Thursday included updated language in the road use agreement noting that equipment such as transition lines would not be allowed to be constructed in any county right-of-way or easement without prior written approval.

The new wind farm ordinance, which was first presented in March after being hashed out by a seven-member study committee, is twice as long as the seven-page original that was put in place more than a decade ago.

Among the proposed changes are the following turbine setback increases and additions:

  • 1.5 times the height of the turbine away from the property line of non-participating landowners, up from the current 350 feet or 1.1 times the height of the turbine.
  • 1,500 feet from residential dwellings for non-participating landowners, up from the current 1,000 feet.
  • 1,500 feet from any church, school, business or public building. S
  • One-half mile from any nature preserve, park or recreational use area.

The updated ordinance also notes that any buried cable must be at least 5 feet deep, with warning mesh at 3 feet. Cables would also have to be marked at road crossings, creeks, river beds and property lines.

Also addressed is shadow flicker — the shadow produced by the rotating blades — with a requirement that the wind farm operator must take “reasonable steps” to minimize the impact upon receiving a written complaint from a landowner.

Plan commission, via the study committee, has been reviewing the county’s wind farm ordinance since last summer after Jay County Commissioners followed its recommendation to impose a three-year moratorium on such developments in response to opposition of Scout Clean Energy’s proposal for Bitter Ridge Wind Farm. (The construction process is getting underway this week on that project, which moved forward under existing rules. It is scheduled to go online in September 2020.)

The most extensive discussion on the solar ordinance Thursday was regarding the section regarding whether or not to allow those who install personal solar energy systems to sell energy to offsite users. The proposed ordinance now states that power created from such systems is for “on-site use only by the owner.” Language addressing net metering — connecting to a public-utility power grid to transfer surplus power — was deleted.

The other significant addition was setting a permit fee of $1,750 per megawatt hour, which matches the wind farm ordinance.

Proposed changes to other sections of the county zoning ordinance that were advanced Thursday include:

  • Deleting a section of the ordinance regarding urban residential districts, none of which exist in Jay County.
  • A requirement that all new homes must have more than 950 square feet of occupied space. (The current ordinance does not include size requirements.)
  • The addition of a section about conflicts of interest, the language of which mirrors state code.
  • An increase in setbacks for ponds to 75 feet from a road right of way, up from the current 50 feet.
  • Clarification that the sections of the ordinance directly addressing small wind energy systems, commercial wind farms and solar energy systems supersede other sections of the ordinance when addressing such developments.

Copies of the proposed changes to the Jay County Zoning Ordinance are as follows:

Section 217 Wind Farms Standards - Sept 2019

Section 218 Small Wind Energy - Sept 2019

Section 219 Solar Energy Standards - Sept 2019

 

 

US DOE: Farmer’s Guide to Going Solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 12, 2019  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments
Lanai solar farm sheep
Photographer: Merrill Smith

US DOE: Farmer's Guide to Going Solar

A growing number of farms and agricultural businesses are looking to solar to power their daily operations. Thanks in part to the Solar Energy Technologies Office's investments, the cost of going solar has declined, enabling more installations across the country. Consider these questions to help you determine what’s best for you and your farm.

See https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/farmers-guide-going-solar

Here are the questions this US DOE website addresses:

  • Will solar modules contaminate the soil underneath or around them?
  • Can solar modules change the microclimate underneath the modules and worsen invasive species, fungal, nematode or other pest problems?
  • Will solar modules heat up and dry out vegetation or crops under the modules?
  • Can wild animals like antelope or elk graze under solar modules?
  • Can domesticated animals like sheep or cattle graze at ground-mounted solar facilities?
  • What is the impact of solar modules on birds or other wildlife species?
  • Can you grow native vegetation or pollinator habitat underneath solar modules?
  • Will solar modules drive up the price of food?
  • Is it safe to spray agrochemicals near solar modules?
  • Can solar modules power my irrigation equipment?
  • I lease my farmland. Can I still install solar PV?
  • I can’t drive my tractor through or around solar modules. Are there ways I can still install solar?
  • I need to burn my fields every year. Can I still install solar PV?
  • My farmland floods in the spring. Can I still install solar PV?
  • What are the impacts of dust on the performance of solar PV modules?
  • Can my land be converted back to agricultural land after the life of the solar system?
  • What are the benefits of co-locating solar and crop production?
  • Are there trade-offs of raising solar modules to accommodate crop production?

Henry Co (IN) Planning Commission: Arguments for, against wind farm

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 26, 2019  /   Posted in wind  /   No Comments

Henry County Plan Commission_07-23-2019

Members of the Henry County (IN) Planning Commission hearing testimony on 7/23/19 on the Big Blue River Wind Farm proposed by the Calpine Corp.

Big Blue River Wind Farm hearing

A very large turn out in Bundy Auditorium in New Castle for the 4.5 hour public hearing.

IMG_1529

Rep. Tom Sauders (R-Lewisville) attended and testified 7/23/19.

Above photos taken by Laura Ann Arnold

Arguments for, against wind farm

Darryl Neal (right) points to a map showing where a proposed wind turbine would go up across the street from the home his son, Jake, is building. Darryl wondered outloud if Jake should have even started work on the new home. The map also shows four-mile buffer zones around different communities in that part of the county.

By TRAVIS WEIK

tweik@thecouriertimes.com

“Thank you, Henry County, for showing up tonight,” County Commission Ed Tarantino said Tuesday.

Tarantino was speaking to the Henry County Planning Commission – and the hundreds of people sitting out in Bundy Auditorium to see how the planning commission voted on a proposed wind farm.

The Henry County Planning Commission ultimately did not approve a permit request Tuesday night for the Big Blue River Wind Farm, which is owned by Calpine Corporation.

Before their final vote, however, the planning commission members heard approximately two hours of comments from people supporting the application, people opposing the application and government entities and representatives.

In support

The first two people to speak in favor of Henry County’s proposed wind farm were actually from Indianapolis.

Lauren Ann Arnold offered a national perspective of the energy regulatory industry. Arnold said there is a nationwide move of energy companies to strive for 100% carbon-free renewable energy as the long-term expectation for meeting electricity needs.

Jared Noblitt serves as Executive Director of the Indiana Conservative Alliance for Energy.

“While many folks of Henry County seem fixated on the negatives of allowing wind turbines here, we are focused on the benefits,” Noblitt said.

Noblitt argued a wind farm in Henry County would generate millions of dollars in property taxes, helping get around the state’s property tax caps.

He said a project like Calpine’s would also give local farmers another way to get the most out of their personal property.

New Castle resident Bruce Bailey said wind farm projects could be step in the right direction to combating climate change.

“The world needs alternative, renewable sources of energy to replace carbon-based fuels,” Bailey said. “Henry County needs to participate in this transfer to alternative sources of energy.”

Henry County farmer David Score said it’s getting harder and harder to make ends meet in farming. Allowing some farmers to install wind turbines on their land could help matters, he said.

One speaker also argued for the wind farm project because it would take a 1-1.5 years to complete and that means jobs for people in Henry County.

“If they do come, they will be built union and they will be built local,” he said.

In total, 10 people spoke in support of the permit request.

In opposition

Attorney Steve Snyder represented several individuals and five local towns at Tuesday’s public hearing. Snyder reminded the planning commission members they have the authority to increase safety setback distances beyond the minimums in the county ordinance.

“If you review the information I have provided on setbacks, you will see that 1,500 ft. setback from a residence is woefully inadequate,” Snyder said.

Snyder said the five towns he represents have filed suit against Big Blue River Wind Farm LLC “to enforce health and safety ordinances that were adopted by the towns.”

Snyder said those ordinances, which create four-mile buffer zones around each town, were created by state lawmakers to give Indiana towns the ability to protect their citizens from “threats to health and safety” existing outside the towns.

Harrison Township resident Rosalind Richey accused Calpine of not meeting all the requirements in their application. Richey said, for example, the studies provided do not cover low-frequency noise or infrasound, as outlined in the ordinance.

Richey claimed the plan also ignores other underground utilities in the area.

“This plan puts the health and safety and general welfare of potentially thousands of people at risk,” Richey said.

Mike Hagerman, also from Harrison Township, called the public hearing “another opportunity for this planning commission to protect Henry County and Henry County citizens.”

Hagerman was distressed at the thought of the earthwork that would be required to pour the foundations of 500 ft. turbines. He also worried about the concrete bases leeching into underground water supplies.

Retired educator Robert Hobbs said three turbines are planned near his home.

Hobbs asked for clarification on any penalties Henry County could use against Calpine or any other company that violated the wind ordinances.

Betsy Mills, from rural Middletown, and Jim McShirley, of Jefferson Township, argued that wind turbines would suppress growth in Henry County.

McShirley used the terms “walled off, entombed, encapsulated” to describe what could happen to Henry County as economic growth continues to spread for Indianapolis.

In total, 15 people spoke in opposition to the permit request.

Governmental

State Representative Tom Saunders (R-Lewisville) was included in the “opposition” segment of the public hearing. Nonetheless, he spoke as the man who represents Henry County in the Statehouse.

Saunders pointed out that in the most recent legislative session, the legislature grandfathered 12 ordinances into law from Henry County towns that created the buffer zones mentioned earlier in the meeting.

Saunders had a 2008 Indiana Supreme Court ruling as support to his argument that towns have the ability to pass local regulatory ordinances, even if they don’t have explicit zoning authority.

“Those ordinances were adopted legally and lawfully and they stand that way today,” Saunders said to the planning commission. “I think, and you guys can correct me if I’m wrong, of the 38 turbines, 36 are within the buffer zone.”

Saunders said it appeared Henry County voters spoke in the last election when they replaced five incumbents with anti-wind candidates.

“I think it is our duty to represent the people who sent us here and who elect us and depend on us to look out for their well-beings,” Saunders said.

Commissioner Tarantino said, “For Henry County, the negatives far outweigh the positives.”

Susan Huhn, president of the Henry County Council, quoted figures from Calpine claiming the wind farm could provide $800,000 a year, on average, in tax revenue for Henry County. Huhn asked how much that new money could ultimately cost the community.

Huhn said wind farms could discourage families from moving to Henry County. Fewer families mean fewer students enrolled in local schools. Which in turn translates to less state funding and even less money to pay teachers.

“We need to choose wisely how we use our resources,” Huhn said.

Henry County Auditor Debbie Walker cited enrollment data further illustrating how school districts around wind farms lost students after turbines went up in their area. County Council member Peg Stefandel showed that Henry County has a higher population density than any other Indiana county that has industrial wind turbines.

Linda Winchester, Henry County Recorder, recounted the hours and money people have spent in her office researching proposed wind farm projects over the years.

“As on official, I know the importance of listening and working on behalf of my constituents,” Winchester said. “We are to serve them, abiding by their wishes. Otherwise, we jeopardize their trust in our positions as officials.”

Winchester also recently learned she may be living in the proposed wind farm area.

“Like the voters, I do not wish to live in such a project,” she told the planning commission.

The Henry County Planning Commission ultimately voted 4-4 on the request. Because the request needed five votes either way to definitively be approved or denied, it is officially “not approved.”

There was no word from the Planning Commission office as of Wednesday afternoon what the next steps are – if any – regarding Calpine’s application.

Editor's note: Comments from Henry County Council President Susan Huhn were clarified.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG