Author Archives Laura Arnold

German solar panel manufacturer to begin production in Osgood (IN)

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 29, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

updated: 3/18/2013 8:04:07 AM

Solar Company to Begin Production

InsideINdianaBusiness.com Report

A German solar panel manufacturer says it will begin production in Ripley County this month. Solarzentrum North America Inc. announced plans in August to invest more than $7 million and create up to 140 jobs.

March 15, 2013 ---News Release

Osgood, Ind. -- Solarzentrum North America, Inc. announces the start of production of their hybrid photovoltaic (electric) and thermal solar panel to begin on March 25, 2013.

Solarzentrum started discussions with the town of Osgood in May 2012 and together worked hand-in-hand. "Without the support of the Town of Osgood, City of Lawrenceburg Municipal development Fund, Ripley County, Ripley County Economic Development Corporation and the Indiana Economic Development Corporation this day would not be possible," stated Reinhard Peter, Solarzentrum’s Owner and CEO. "We are proud to have Solarzentrum here in Osgood and look forward to them being a strong community partner for many years to come," lauded Linda Krinop, Town of Osgood Board President.

The start of production marks the successful culmination of 11 months of work. “We have worked long and hard to finally reach this point,” added Andreas Peter, Solarzentrum’s Director of Manufacturing.

Solarzentrum manufacturers a patent-protected dual power generation solar panel capable of producing up to a combined 900 watts of electrical and thermal energy. This energy can be used in a number of different energy systems such as hot water, heating, cooling and drying. Through the use of high efficiency solar cells and liquid cooling technology, Solarzentrum panels are thirty percent more efficient in the production of electrical energy and deliver up to three times more energy than conventional solar panels.

"With our panels installed throughout the United States, we can demonstrate very attractive payback periods and return on investment," said Sean Furlow, Solarzentrum’s Managing Director.

Solarzentrum will be partnering with local, domestic and global distributors to deliver affordable, reliable and clean renewable energy systems. Solarzentrum’s goal is to add 140 new jobs by the end of 2017. "As demand for renewable energy systems continues to grow both domestically and globally, we see a real opportunity for our partners to establish operations in the region to support our needs adding even more jobs to the local economy," expressed Reinhard Peter.

Source: Solarzentrum North America Inc.,

 http://www.szna-usa.com/

Solar Panel, Solar Energy, Renewable Energy, Clean Energy, Photovoltaic, PV, PV-Thermal, Biomass, consulting, manufacturing

Solarzentrum North America offers a wide range of renewable energy technologies:

 PV-Therm - Our CHP (Combined Heat and Power) module provides up to 4 times more energy compared to a standard photovoltaic module.

PV - You can count on our quality, SZNA delivers only modules with positive tolerance up to +4.99Wp.

Inverters -Inverters are mandatory to convert the output of a (PV) solar panel into a utility frequency alternating current (AC) that can be fed into electrical grids or networks.

Energy Tanks -Offer a maximized utilization of area and energy. The tank is an important component in the heat supply for buildings and serves as a storing unit for the output of solar panels.

renewable energy, green energy, clean energy, photovoltaics, pv-thermal, wind, biomass,Green Energy, Renewable Energy, Clean Energy

Different Shades of Green: Purdue Case Study on Support for Indiana Wind Farms

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 29, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized, wind  /   No Comments

Studies Measure Hoosiers' Views on Wind Farms

Associate Professor of Natural Resources Planning Linda Prokopy says the data suggest Midwesterners could be more open to turbines.

Dear IndianaDG Readers:

I attempted to obtain a copy of this research on-line, however, I only found this link to an excerpt to this study. See http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-013-0026-8#page-1 "Different Shades of Green: A Case Study of Support for Wind Farms in the Rural Midwest." I have contacted the author  to obtain a copy of the full report.

Laura Ann Arnold

updated: 3/28/2013 12:35:14 PM

Studies Measure Hoosiers' Views on Wind Farms

InsideINdianaBusiness.com Report

Purdue University researchers have released their findings on Hoosiers' attitudes toward wind farms. The studies indicate "not a lot of opposition" from residents in three sample counties.

March 27, 2013

News Release

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - Indiana residents are overwhelmingly receptive to wind farms in their communities, even in areas that have rejected turbine development, according to Purdue University studies.

Linda Prokopy, an associate professor of natural resources planning, said much of the research on attitudes toward wind energy and wind farms has focused on coastal states and the reasons people don't want turbines in their communities. She and Kate Mulvaney, a former graduate student, wanted to know how people in the Midwest feel about having wind farms in their communities and the factors that led some places to embrace or reject them.

Prokopy and Mulvaney published two studies on their results in the journals Energy Policy and Environmental Management. One focused on Benton County, Indiana, which has embraced wind farms. The other study compared Benton County with two other Indiana counties - Boone County, which rejected wind farm development, and Tippecanoe County, which at the time was still considering wind farms. The researchers conducted surveys and interviews and studied local newspaper articles on wind energy.

"We found that there is not a lot of opposition from the people in the Midwest," Prokopy said. "And there are not a lot of perceived negative impacts from people who have or live near wind turbines."

In each county, more than 80 percent of survey respondents said they either supported wind farms in their counties or supported them with reservations. That was the case even in areas where local governments were against wind farm development or newspaper articles trended toward more negative aspects of the farms.

"We would have expected differences in support based on the media coverage, but what we found was support across the board," Prokopy said.

Mulvaney said Benton County, which has more than 500 turbines and hundreds more approved, welcomed wind farms for a variety of reasons, including local government support and options for diversifying development within the agricultural-based economy.

"In Benton County, agricultural land is the basis of the economy," Mulvaney said. "Using the land to produce wind is the same or similar to using the land to produce a crop in many people's minds."

The Purdue Extension agent in that county was instrumental in helping to draft ordinances that benefited the communities in which turbines would be located and providing residents with information about wind farm impacts.

"He was definitely seen as a trusted source," Prokopy said.

Despite support from residents, Boone County turned down wind farm development. Prokopy said the biggest factors in that decision were a well-organized opposition and a lack of governmental support.

"The opposition appeared to come from people who worked in Indianapolis but lived in rural parts of the county. They wanted to preserve their landscape," Prokopy said. "They were in the minority, but they were very vocal and, thus, influential in terms of local government." In Tippecanoe County, Prokopy and Mulvaney said the government was supportive, but there was also a strong vocal minority.

"The opposition in Tippecanoe County was focused on setbacks, noise regulations and other rules," Prokopy said. "It was focused on making sure people were protected."

Prokopy said the data suggest the Midwest could be more receptive to wind farm technology, especially in more rural areas that lack other development.

"It certainly shows that many of the concerns that have kept wind farms from developing on the coasts aren't issues here in the Midwest," Prokopy said.

The Purdue College of Agriculture funded the studies.

Source: Purdue University

CAC Open Letter to Indiana Gov. Mike Pence: VETO SB 560

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   March 28, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

image003

For Immediate Release: March 28, 2013

Contact: Kerwin Olson (317) 205-3535

The Honorable Mike Pence, Governor of the State of Indiana:

Senate Bill 560 (Utility Transmission) will likely be headed to your desk in the near future. As a representative of over 40,000 residential ratepayers in our great State, Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana respectfully requests that you protect Hoosier ratepayers with the same vigor with which you are fighting to protect Hoosier taxpayers. We pray that you use the authority granted to your office in Article 5, Section 14 of the Indiana Constitution to veto SB560.

We know that you are aware of the significant increases in the cost of energy with which Hoosier ratepayers are currently struggling. In your Roadmap for Indiana, you correctly state: "Unfortunately, Indiana's status as a low-cost energy state is in danger of changing." Indiana now ranks 24th in the country for industrial electric rates, and the average monthly electric bill for residential households in Indiana similarly ranks as the 24th highest in our nation. SB560 will exacerbate the very problem that you identify, making it easier for the monopoly utilities to raise the monthly bills of captive Hoosier consumers and jeopardizing our slipping status as a low-cost energy state.

In a recent op-ed published in the Indianapolis Star, you express your desire for "…a budget that let[s] hardworking Hoosiers keep more of what they earn." SB560 will achieve the exact opposite of your objective by sending more of Hoosiers' earnings to the coffers of the monopoly utilities through significant increases in monthly utility bills. Meanwhile, utilities are realizing significant (and, in some cases, record) earnings, whereas Hoosier households are struggling with stagnant and diminishing wages.

We appreciate the intent of the Indiana General Assembly in moving SB560. We agree that Indiana faces challenges in our need to improve, modernize, and repair our utility infrastructure. We also agree that we must make investments in an effort to create jobs and make Indiana an attractive place to start a business and raise a family. However, SB560 will leave these decisions in the hands of an industry notorious for being irresponsible with capital as they strive to increase earnings for shareholders, frequently at the expense of their customers and the public interest.

We were encouraged with the plan you articulated in your Roadmap for Indiana to "[w]ork with stakeholders to develop strategies for effectively addressing our need to upgrade our electricity generation and transmission infrastructure." SB560 ignores this stated desire and effectively closes the door on the discussion by leaving the future of Indiana's energy policy squarely in the control of the monopoly utilities.

SB560 is contrary to all of your stated campaign and gubernatorial objectives. We ask that you reflect on the impact that SB560 will have on hardworking Hoosiers. We request you consider the tremendous consequences that this legislation will have on the quality of life for the most vulnerable among us, particularly the elderly population, who survive on fixed incomes and are forced to make tough choices on a daily basis between food, energy, and health care. Please protect Hoosier ratepayers, protect the public interest, and protect your legacy by vetoing SB560.

Respectfully,

Kerwin Olson

 

Kerwin Olson

Executive Director

(317) 205-3535

www.citact.org

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG