Author Archives Laura Arnold

IPL Parent Company Announces Move to Indianapolis; Why? What does it really mean?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 14, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

IPL credits $1B in Indiana investments with nabbing new U.S. hub

Dan Human, Indianapolis Business Journal,  June 14, 2013

The state's corporate-friendly environmental policies aside, Indianapolis Power and Light Co.’s parent chose the city as its new center for U.S. operations largely because of the utility's billion-dollar upgrades.

AES Corp., a global energy provider headquartered in Arlington, Va., announced Friday that it planned to make Indianapolis a national hub and add up to 100 jobs, mostly for administrative and back-office functions. The new operation, dubbed the U.S. Strategic Business Unit, will be housed in IPL's existing headquarters on Monument Circle.

The unit will include IPL; Dayton Power & Light in Dayton, Ohio; and 19 other AES subsidiaries in the U.S., mostly power generators, reaching as far away as Hawaii.

During a Friday press conference, IPL CEO Ken Zabzebski, who will head the new nationwide operation, listed Indiana’s business climate and quality of work force as reasons AES chose Indianapolis.

But IPL's own investments were a big key, said Zabzebski, who will remain as IPL's CEO on top of his new role.

IPL plans to retire six coal-fire units at its Eagle Valley operation in Martinsville and build a natural-gas plant. The company also wants to upgrade coal plants on Harding Street in Indianapolis and in Petersburg in order to meet changing federal regulations.

The three projects will cost about $1 billion.

“We made a major investment in this state,” Zabzebski said Friday. “This continues to reinforce that investment, and [we] really believe in the state of Indiana and what we’re doing here.”

The investments—in particular the $511 million allotted for Harding Street and Petersburg—that helped lure the jobs to Indianapolis have been a point of contention for environmental and consumer groups.

The Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter and Citizens Action Coalition have both petitioned the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to deny IPL the right to upgrade the plants.

The groups believe IPL did not properly assess costs, and that there are better options available to meet regulations.

Now that IPL has pinned job growth to the investments, the IURC case has a new dynamic. Gov. Mike Pence and Indianapolis Deputy Mayor Deron Kintner both spoke publicly in favor of AES’ new operation at Friday's announcement.

Jodi Perras, Indiana’s representative for the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign, said Indianapolis needs the jobs, but she hoped the AES announcement would not affect the IURC matter.

AES has developed renewable energy projects around the world, and should consider using some of those approaches in Indiana, she added.

“Perhaps some of their ideas could enlighten some of their employees in Indianapolis,” Perras said.

AES posted the first set of new jobs Thursday. Zabzebski said the company will search for people to fill financial and accounting positions in the first wave of hiring, which will take a few months.

The next round will include a lot of support jobs, such as human resources. The hiring will likely extend into 2014.

About 80 of the 100 new jobs will be new, with the remaining 20 being existing AES employees who transfer to Indianapolis.

AES is setting up similar hubs around the world. The company plans a European hub in the Netherlands and an Asian one in the Philippines, Zabzebski said.

Selecting Indianapolis as a management hub made sense to Morningstar analyst Charles Fishman, who covers AES. Besides the $1 billion in upgrades, IPL is bigger and more profitable than the Dayton utility, he told IBJ on Thursday.

"Indianapolis Power and Light has a reputation as being a very well-run utility," Fishman said.

About 1,400 people work for IPL today.

SEPA 2012 Top 10 Utility Solar Rankings Report; Is Your Utility on the List? Why not? What can you do to change that?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 13, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Is your electric utility on this SEPA 2012 Top 10 Utility Solar Rankings Report? Why not? What can you do to change that? The first step might be to learn more by signing up for the SEPA "free" webinar. SEPA will be hosting a webinar to review the report results on Thursday, June 27th at 2 p.m. EDT.  For more information, please click here

SEPA Report Reveals Annual Solar Capacity Surpassed 2 GW for First Time in 2012

Top 10 Utility Solar Rankings Report Shows that Large-Scale Solar Projects Drove Market Growth Up 160 Percent from 2011

June 11, 2013

The Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA) today released the full 2012 Top 10 Utility Solar Rankings Report, which ranks utilities nationally and by utility type for more than 260 of the most solar-active utilities, representing 96 percent of the U.S. solar electric power market. The sixth edition of the report, the 2012 rankings analyzes the amount of new solar power interconnected by U.S. electric utilities and uncovered three key findings:

  1. Annual solar capacity surpassed 2,000 MW-ac for the first time in 2012;
  2. The market share for large-scale solar projects grew 160 percent to 1,130 MW from 2011; and
  3. Net energy metering (NEM), or customer-sited solar, remains a large part of the solar market,  accounting for 99 percent of newly installed projects, with the most growth concentrated in five states (CA, HI, AZ, NJ, CO).

 

Detailed Analysis of the Solar Market

According to the report, utilities integrated almost 2.4 GW-ac or 2,384 MW of solar electric capacity in 2012, which is the equivalent to installing eight natural gas combined cycle power plants. Currently, there are more than 300,000 solar projects and approximately 6,100 MW installed across the United States.

 

Utilities purchased more than 1,000 MW of large-scale solar, mostly through power-purchase agreements.  The wholesale utility market included more than 70 photovoltaic (PV) projects, including Pacific Gas and Electric’s purchase of the largest solar PV project in the world, the 250 MW Agua Caliente project. Although no concentrating solar power (CSP) projects were completed in 2012, several projects exceeding 750 MW (cumulative) are expected in 2013.  SEPA predicts that the completion of utility-procured, large-scale solar projects in 2013 will likely surpass the 2,400 MW of solar that was deployed by all market segments in 2012.

 

"The results in the 2012 Utility Solar Rankings Report provide an annual roadmap for stakeholders in the solar industry,” said SEPA President and CEO Julia Hamm.  “As the industry’s singular comprehensive report of its kind, it covers data and analysis ranging from utility-scale solar growth to residential homes. By delivering reporting and insights such as the rankings, we are enabling a more informed marketplace that includes utilities, manufacturers and project developers.”

 

Customer-sited NEM projects grew 46 percent compared to 2011, with utilities interconnecting nearly 90,000 projects totaling 1,151 MW-ac last year. Currently there are more than 3,500 MW of NEM projects in the country, 80 percent of which are concentrated in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and New Jersey.  Non-NEM projects made up more than 52 percent of the total capacity installed in 2012, but only constituted 0.5 percent of the number of projects.

 

"Customer-sited solar was a large part of the 2012 solar market driven by third-party residential leasing and we expect this will continue to grow in 2013,” added Hamm. "We expect continued growth in the five above-mentioned states, in addition to other emerging markets across the country."

 

For more information and to download the free 2012 Top 10 Utility Solar Rankings Report visit http://www.sepatop10.org/

 

SEPA will be hosting a webinar to review the report results on Thursday, June 27th at 2 p.m. EDT.  For more information, please click here. Sign-up TODAY!

 

About SEPA

SEPA is an educational non-profit organization based in Washington dedicated to helping utilities integrate solar power into their energy portfolios. The SEPA Top 10 Utility Solar Rankings report is one of many market intelligence, utility interaction and educational services SEPA provides to its utility and solar industry members. For more information about SEPA, visit our website at www.solarelectricpower.org

"The results in the 2012 Utility Solar Rankings Report provide an annual roadmap for stakeholders in the solar industry,” said SEPA President and CEO Julia Hamm.

Indianapolis Hosting 7th Annual AgSTAR National Conference

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 12, 2013  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO)  /   No Comments

Dear IndianaDG Readers:

I apologize that I was unable to post this information earlier so that more people who are interested could have attended this conference.

It is a national EPA conference involved in funding Anaerobic Digesters and related processes.   I am currently attending now and I assume presentations will be available on-line.

http://www.cvent.com/events/7th-agstar-national-conference/event-summary-1ea211ca97fe41d99d6a3a728017841b.aspx?dvce=1

AgSTAR is holding its 7th National Conference on June 10-12 in Indianapolis, IN. This meeting is the only national conference focused solely on promoting anaerobic digestion in the agriculture sector!
There have been two days of conference sessions exploring some of the top issues affecting anaerobic digestion in the agriculture sector, including:

  • The influence of CA’s carbon market
  • Optimizing revenue from AD system byproducts
  • Innovative approaches to AD in the swine sector
  • Uses for biogas beyond electricity
  • Assessing co-digestion for your AD project
  • Putting excess nutrients to work

Norma McDonald with Organic Waste Systems, Inc. is giving a presentation on the Culver Duck Farm in Middlebury, IN which is using the NIPSCO voluntary feed-in tariff (VFIT)!

Please contact me for more information!

Laura Ann Arnold, President--IndianaDG

 

 

IREC: “Free” Project Permit Webinar: Cutting Red Tape for Solar Energy 6/5/13; Learn How to Lower Solar Permitting Costs

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   June 04, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Join Project Permit Webinar: Cutting Red Tape for Solar Energy

Wednesday, June 5, 2013 | 1:00-2:00 pm EDT

 

Fees, delays and non-standard practices associated with the local permitting process are addingcut red tape unnecessary costs to solar energy in communities across America. Fortunately, local governments have the power to cut through the permitting red tape and become solar champions. This webinar will give you the tools you need to lower the cost of solar permitting in your hometown:* The DOE's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will provide an overview of permitting and other solar "soft" costs;

* Clean Power Finance will show you how to use the National Solar Permitting Database (NSPD), a FREE, community online tool that compiles solar permitting requirements around the nation in one single easy-to-use website;

* The Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) will dive deeper into the nine permitting best practices for affordable solar;

* And Vote Solar will introduce Project Permit, a new website that uses both of those valuable resources to grade cities' solar permitting practices and empower citizens like you to improve them.

 

 

Update on Columbus (IN)-based solar PV manufacturer NuSun Solar; NuSun weathers storm when others go bankrupt

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 30, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Dear IndianaDG Readers:

There has been wide speculation about the current status and future of Columbus, Indiana-based solar PV manufacturer NuSun Solar. Hopefully, these two recent articles from local Columbus (IN) newspaper, The Republic, will help to explain. Be sure to read both stories.

As a founding member of IndianaDG, we wish Ryan Stout and NuSUN Solar the best in weathering the tumultuous  storm of bargain basement priced Chinese solar PV panels--many of which are of inferior quality.

Hang in there, NuSun. IndianaDG is rooting for ya! Surely this is a problem which a flood of new orders could solve for this American solar company and Hoosier entrepreneur.

GO NuSUN!

Laura Ann Arnold

Part 1: Firm given incentives hasn't met quota

By John Clark, Jclark@therepublic.com

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Columbus officials are seeking answers from a solar panel manufacturer that took almost $900,000 in local and state incentives but is not meeting hiring expectations.

Depending on the answers, the city could force Nusun Inc. to begin making payments on its building or even start foreclosure proceedings on the company's property.

The city already has cut off one $600,000 funding stream for the manufacturer.

At issue is whether Nusun is meeting the hiring promises it made in 2011 when local officials provided $325,000 in city and county funds and helped secure a $500,000 grant from Lawrenceburg casino revenues. Nusun had promised to have 80 employees by the end of 2012, but a state report shows it has only 15.

The company was required to provide the city with an annual status report by May 15 documenting its compliance with the agreement. As of Friday, however, the city had not received the 2013 status report, nor can it verify that the company filed a 2012 status report, City Attorney Jeff Logston said.

Since the deadline passed, the city has called, emailed and mailed a letter to the company seeking information and so far has received no response.

Nusun was required to file quarterly reports with the state to meet the requirements for those grants. The February report to the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs showed 15 employees. At the end of last year, the city - which administers the IOCRA grant - filed to cut off the funding and heard nothing in response from Nusun, Logston said.

Attempts to reach Nusun Chief Executive Officer Ryan Stout by telephone Thursday and Friday were unsuccessful.

Mayor Kristen Brown said the city gave the company $125,000 in economic development income tax revenues, the county gave $100,000 in EDIT funds, and the Columbus Redevelopment Commission gave $100,000 in funds from the city's tax-increment financing districts.

"The city has effectively acted like a venture capitalist here, making a bet on a startup company and technology," Brown said.

In exchange, the company agreed to the 80-employees minimum by the end of 2012 with an average wage of $20.31 an hour. To be in compliance, the company should have had 80 percent of those hired by the end of 2012, or 64 employees. A state report, filed in February, showed it had met 19 percent of its staffing requirement.

By 2020, the company was expected to have 240 full-time workers and an annual payroll of about $10 million.

Brown said the city holds the mortgage on the company's $580,000 property on International Drive. As long as the company met its targets, the city agreed to forgive the monthly $6,875 mortgage payments, she said. The city already has forgiven $178,750 in loan payments, Brown said.

If Nusun is found by the City Council not to be in substantial compliance, the city could stop forgiving the monthly mortgage payments, Brown said. Eventually, if the company does not make those payments, the city could foreclose on the factory.

"It is not something that we would want to do," Brown said. "Obviously, the city would prefer that the business be successful and meeting its obligations."

The company was given access to a $600,000 line of funding through IOCRA, which reimbursed certain expenditures. So far, the company has used $71,349 of that funding.

The issue will be brought before the Columbus City Council at its June 4 meeting, Brown said. It's likely the council then would conduct a public hearing June 18, when company officials would be asked to attend and report on their progress.

City Council President Ryan Brand said council members first heard about the issue last week and will wait to hear all the facts before making a decision.

"I typically don't like to make any decisions until I make sure that I have collected all the information I can get my hands on," Brand said. "I want to make sure that I am confident in understanding before I am really ready to make a decision on what is going to happen here."

The decisions to offer the incentives were made by a previous City Council and mayor based on the best information they had available, Brand said. Nobody can predict whether a business will succeed or fail, he said.

Brand would not speculate on whether similar incentives should be offered in the future.

When considering incentives such as tax abatements, in which companies also have to meet employment promises, the current City Council members strongly believe that companies should meet the commitments to keep those incentives, Brand said.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

RELATED CONTENT:

Title: Nusun Inc.

Content: What: A solar panel manufacturer that received local and state incentives in 2011.

Incorporated: 2009.

Where: 12,500-square-foot building at 7440 S. International Drive, Woodside Industrial Park.

Expected employees as of December 2012: 80.

Actual employees as of February 2013: 15.

Incentives:

$125,000 in Columbus EDIT funds.

$100,000 in Bartholomew County EDIT Funds

$100,000 in Columbus TIF funds

$500,000 grant from Lawrenceburg casino funds.

$71,859 grants out of $600,000 possible from Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs.

Monthly mortgage payments being forgiven: $6,875.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Part 2: Solar firm on way back

By John Clark, Jclark@therepublic.com

May 29, 2013

The top executive of Nusun Inc. said his company has survived where other solar energy companies have failed and he plans to tell Columbus City Council that the business is making progress.

City officials said last week that they were concerned that Nusun had not met employment goals promised in 2011 when the city, county and state came up with almost $900,000 in incentives for the Columbus company.

The city holds the mortgage for the company's plant on International Drive in the Walesboro Industrial Park but is forgiving the monthly payments. The city could start making the company pay back the loan or even foreclose on the property, Mayor Kristen Brown said.

Ryan Stout, the company's chief executive officer, said the solar business has taken a huge hit in the past two years, as Chinese companies were willing to lose hundreds of millions of dollars to try to corner the solar energy market. Stout said that glut of panels has disappeared and now his company can produce panels for about the same price as the overseas competitors at higher quality.

In the meantime, Nusun has "battened down the hatches," Stout said, and tried to weather the storm. In the past year, 500 solar energy companies have gone out of business, he said.

"We could see the shakeout happening, and my goal was not to just be another company that goes out of business," Stout said.

"And now we are in a perfect position to get business that was going to the Chinese."

The company recently received a $400,000 contract for 2,100 panels in northern Indiana, Stout said. That will allow him to bring eight part-time employees to full time, for a total of 15 employees.

The agreement with the city and county called for 80 employees at the end of 2012. Stout said the temptation could be to take every dollar available, hire 80 employees and then fire them all, but instead Nusun has taken a slower approach.

Stout said the company deliberately decided not to use an entire $600,000 grant from the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs for equipment purchases, instead using just over 10 percent of the money. The grant had a two-year window and ended at the end of last year.

"Why spend taxpayer dollars on equipment that we don't need, just because it is available?" Stout said.

One of the concerns of city officials was that Nusun has not been filing compliance reports each year. The company has been filing quarterly reports for the IOCRA grant and did not realize that the city needed a separate report for the local money, Stout said. He said he plans to speak with City Attorney Jeff Logston and get that report filed soon.

Stout said he looks forward to the opportunity to explain the company's progress to the city.

"I am not ashamed of what we have done because we are still in business and we are growing," Stout said. "I don't mind going in front of City Council and explaining what we have done and why we have done it."

Should the city start charging the company the $6,875 monthly mortgage payment that is now being forgiven, it would damage the company at an especially sensitive time, Stout said.

"Honestly, that would kill our business," Stout said. "It would add so many more expenses into our equation."

John Clark, senior reporter  jclark@therepublic.com
The Republic                       Ph: 812-379-5769
Columbus, Ind.                   Toll Free: 800-876-7811 ext. 769
47201                                   Fax: 812-379-5711

See original articles in PDF format here:

The_Republic_05-29-2013_A1_NuSUN

The_Republic_05-29-2013_A3_NuSUN

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG