Author Archives Laura Arnold

For Thanksgiving from GreenTechMedia: The 5 Biggest Clean Energy Turkeys of 2013

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 28, 2013  /   Posted in Biofuels  /   No Comments

The 5 Biggest Clean Energy Turkeys of 2013

The 5 Biggest Clean Energy Turkeys of 2013

Who’s the biggest turkey of them all?

Stephen Lacey
November 26, 2013

Creating year-end lists is usually an exercise in positive thinking and congratulatory back-slapping.

But as the popularity of this year's list of deceased solar companies showed us, GTM's readers are far more interested in the morbid and the sarcastic.

In celebration of the Thanksgiving holiday, here is our list of 2013's top five turkeys. We trust that our readers will add more in the comment section below.

1. Fox News

Fox News easily wins biggest turkey of the year. The media firm (many find it hard to call it a news organization) has perfected the art of spin and fake hype better than anyone. Ever since the Obama administration made clean energy a priority, the industry has been the target of Fox personalities. Here are a few of Fox News' greatest hits of the year:

-- In February, Fox Business reporter Shibani Joshi claimed that Germany has become a world leader in solar because the country has "a lot more sun than we do." It didn't take long for her to make a correction after viewers and bloggers pointed out that Germany's solar resources are comparable to Alaska's.

-- In March, Fox & Friends aired yet another segment claiming that "solar power is tanking our economy." They forgot to mention the U.S. solar market was worth $11.5 billion last year, and it is set to double 40 years' worth of solar capacity over the next 2.5 years.

-- And in May, Fox Business reporter Elizabeth MacDonald randomly claimed that Tesla's battery "conks out after about 16 miles." The number appeared to be completely made up. She later had to apologize, saying she "gave incomplete information."

2. American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)

In 2012, ALEC made it an explicit goal to write legislation designed to kill or weaken state-level renewable energy standards (RES). In 2013, it ramped up its efforts and helped push anti-RES bills in thirteen states.

None of them passed, and very few gained any traction. ALEC's record this year was 0 for 13.

The "stealth business lobbyist" may be pulling in money from Exxon Mobil, the Koch Brothers, Peabody Energy and other fossil fuel interests with a less-than-enthusiastic view of renewables. But it didn't have the most crucial piece of a winning strategy: a constituency.

As RESs have evolved, they've created a lot of jobs and economic opportunities that encourage people to fight for keeping targets in place. That makes it very hard for ALEC to parachute into states and repeal the laws.

This year may have been a flop for ALEC on the renewables front. But keep tuned in 2014, when the lobbying group plans to take on solar net metering.

3. Congress 

With an approval rating in the single digits, Congress has done a spectacularly good job at doing almost nothing this year. Its single greatest achievement was shutting the government down for sixteen days.

On energy, there were lots of messaging bills aimed at stopping EPA regulations, loosening fracking regulations, building Keystone XL and halting efficiency standards for light bulbs. None of them went anywhere.

The only bill with any chance of succeeding is Shaheen-Portman, which would create a wide range of national efficiency programs. Republicans and Democrats are mostly supportive of the legislation, but it was derailed in September when Senator David Ritter (R-LA) prevented voting unless an anti-Obamacare amendment was approved.

There's a small chance that Shaheen-Portman may still pass the Senate, and possibly the House. But the window of opportunity is closing quickly -- and there's not a lot of hope that members of Congress will pull it together by the end of the year.

4. The biofuels sector

In 2007, the U.S. was riding high on biofuels. The agriculture industry was promising a farming renaissance, startups were promising endless amounts of non-food-based fuels and Congress was promising true energy independence. An update to the renewable fuels standard was passed that year, supported by the George W. Bush administration and mostly left to the Obama administration to execute in 2008.

Five years later, there are virtually no cellulosic fuels hitting the market, forcing the Environmental Protection Agency to drastically scale back targets.

This fall, the Department of Energy's Inspector General issued a report showing that the government had failed to come close to meeting its biofuels targets. A combination of poor market conditions and insufficient reviews of projects plagued the DOE's efforts to scale up advanced biofuels.

In addition, the Obama administration and biofuels industry have come under fire for poor environmental practices. A recent AP investigation showed that the recent push for biofuels had eaten up vast amounts of conservation lands, increased the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico and failed to reduce greenhouse gases.

A lot has changed since the exuberance over biofuels that existed in 2007.

5. Arizona Public Service

Arizona's biggest utility didn't make it on the list because of its fight against net metering. It made the list because executives lied about funding an anti-net-metering television campaign that compared solar service companies Sunrun and SolarCity to the bankrupt manufacturer Solyndra.

"APS had nothing to do with the making of or the content of the video," said APS representative Jenna Shaver to GTM in July.

There was one big problem with that statement: APS did, in fact, have something to do with the making of the video campaign. In October, the Arizona Republic reported that APS gave two political groups responsible for the campaign hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Even after getting caught lying about funding outside political groups -- while spending millions more in a broad campaign to limit net metering -- the utility eventually failed to get the changes it wanted.

TAGS: alecarizona public servicebiofuelscongressfox newsnet metering

CAC Kerwin Olson: “Don’t let IURC operate in shadows”

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 25, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 

http://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/readers/2013/11/20/dont-let-iurc-operate-in-shadows/3652985/

Don’t let IURC operate in shadows

2:11 p.m. EST;  November 20, 2013

This is in response to the Nov. 12 article “Indiana utility regulator’s job move raises new questions,” in which I was quoted.

First, the move by Commissioner Kari Bennett is the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission’s loss and MISO’s gain. She is precisely the type of individual the state should strive to have serving as a commissioner. She was exceptionally well qualified, attentive, engaged and interested. Let’s hope Gov. Mike Pence identifies a candidate equal to the task and of the same quality of Commissioner Bennett to fill the huge void she leaves behind.

 

Second, from the perspective of Citizens Action Coalition, the issue is not whether Bennett should be “allowed” to work for MISO. She, and anyone else, should have the freedom to seek gainful employment that uses their education, experience and interests. The problem lies in the decisions made about how the transition should be made and the way in which the information was presented to the public.

 

The IURC immediately raised questions and suspicion by issuing a news release with no indication of where the commissioner was going. It was then learned that rather than doing the right thing and seeking a formal ethics opinion (and perhaps requiring a one-year cooling-off period), the IURC chose instead to seek informal approval from the inspector general and then attempted to keep that information confidential. Unacceptable.

 

It was by its own actions that the IURC found themselves once again on The Star’s front page. Chairman Jim Atterholt and General Counsel Doug Webber have done some good things and implemented many necessary changes since the ethics scandal that resulted in the termination of the former chairman. However, this episode shows there are still some lessons to be learned. What the public needs (and deserves) is to feel confident in the process which should require full transparency, disclosure and an acknowledgment that the rules do in fact apply to them.

 

There are different standards applied to those who choose to serve at the IURC and have the awesome and difficult task of regulating the giant utility monopolies.

 

Operating in the shadows should not be tolerated and will be called out. The responsibility of the agency is too important to accept that type of behavior.

 

Kerwin Olson

Executive Director

Citizens Action Coalition

Here is the original article that the above references.

Indiana utility regulator’s job move raises new questions

The newest member of the powerful Indiana state agency that approves utility rates is resigning after less than three years on the job to take a job with a private organization that represents dozens of utilities across the Midwest in controlling the region’s electrical grid.

Kari A.E. Bennett plans to leave the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission on Nov. 22 to take a job as senior corporate counsel with the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, better known as MISO.

Some consumer and open government advocates say the move raises more questions about the revolving door between utilities and regulators, especially in the wake of an unrelated ethics scandal at the state agency.

“Has the commission learned nothing from the ethics scandal?” said Kerwin Olson, executive director of Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana. “The revolving door continues to spin out of control.”

Indiana’s inspector general cleared Bennett to take the MISO job, saying the move would not violate Indiana’s revolving door rules because she would not be lobbying the IURC in her new capacity.

Bennett did not return calls Tuesday to The Indianapolis Star to say why she decided to take a job with MISO, or when she began negotiating for the position.

MISO, based in Carmel, represents more than 40 utilities, including Duke Energy, Indianapolis Power & Light Co., Vectren and Northern Indiana Public Service Co., all of which appear before the IURC to seek approval for utility rates and projects. It also represents some citizens’ groups and consumer advocates.

Bennett is one of five commissioners on the IURC that sets utility rates and reviews requests for new power plants. She was appointed in January 2011 by then-Gov. Mitch Daniels to fill the unexpired term of David Lott Hardy.

Daniels had fired Hardy in 2010 as the state's top utility regulator after learning he had several private meetings with Duke Energy executives about cost overruns at its $3.3 billion coal-gasification power plant at Edwardsport in southwestern Indiana. Hardy also helped the agency's top attorney seek a job with Duke while helping to oversee the Edwardsport case.

In September, Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said he would seek to reinstate criminal charges against Hardy for his role in the Duke Energy scandal. A judge had earlier dismissed four felony charges against Hardy.

MISO is responsible for overseeing nearly 66,000 miles of transmission lines that make up the electric grid throughout the Midwest and part of Canada.

At the IURC, Bennett served as liaison between the agency and MISO over such things as ironing out transmission boundaries that involved Indiana utilities.

Indiana law requires state employees to wait for a year after leaving government to take a job as a lobbyist or with an organization with whom they negotiated any contracts or made decisions that affected their new employer.

The IURC’s general counsel and ethics officer, Doug Webber, told The Star that Bennett would not lobby the IURC or any other of Indiana’s executive offices in her new job.

Webber said he sought and received informal approval from the Indiana Inspector General’s office to clear Bennett to make the move, in an effort to avoid any possible ethics issues.

He provided a copy of the Inspector General’s letter, written by a staff attorney, that concluded that Bennett’s move would not violate Indiana’s revolving-door restrictions.

“This is rock solid,” Webber said.

He also pointed out that MISO was not subject to the IURC’s jurisdiction and did not have any business relationship with the agency. MISO is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

But some watchdog groups said they were troubled by Bennett’s move, and how it was announced. The IURC issued a press release on Friday about Bennett’s resignation, but did not say where she was going.

Then for several hours on Tuesday, the agency and the ethics commission both said that request for an informal ethics opinion, as well as the response, were confidential under state law. The IURC ultimately agreed to release both documents.

Julia Vaughn, program director for Common Cause/Indiana, said the IURC continues to suffer from credibility issues.

“It’s discouraging that the IURC and the ethics commission seem to have forgotten all about the dark cloud of impropriety that continues to hang over the utility commission,” she said.

Call Star reporter John Russell at (317) 444-6283 and follow him on Twitter at johnrussell99.

Today (11/19/13) is Organizational Day for 2014 Indiana General Assembly

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 19, 2013  /   Posted in 2014 Indiana General Assembly  /   No Comments

Organizational Day for the Second Regular Session of the 118th General Assembly is Tuesday, November 19, 2013. The Indiana House of Representatives will convene at 1:00 pm and the Senate will convene at 1:30 pm.

To Watch the Indiana General Assembly live on-line:

Visit http://www.in.gov/legislative/ then http://www.in.gov/legislative/2441.htm

Then use the pull down menu to select the appropriate Video Stream.

The activity today is mostly ceremonial but it does "kick-off" activity including pre-filing of proposed legislation for the 2014 session of the Indiana General Assembly which reconvenes in January and must adjourn by mid-March.

 

Duke Energy Carolinas files Green Source Rider with NC Utilities Commission (NCUC); What about other states?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 18, 2013  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Duke Energy

 

Download News Release> Duke News Release_11-15-13 Green Source Rider filing - North Carolina_FINAL (3)

Contact: Jeff Brooks
Office: 919.219.9215 | 24-Hour: 800.559.3853

The Green Source Rider offers renewable energy options for industrial and large use customers in the state

 

RALEIGH, N.C. – Duke Energy Carolinas has filed a new renewable energy program
with the N.C. Utilities Commission (NCUC).
The Green Source Rider is an experimental program designed to give energy-intensive
customers, such as manufacturers, data centers, college campuses and big-box
retailers, the option of offsetting some or all of their energy consumption from new load
– such as a new or expanded facility – with renewable energy.
“We’ve been working with our customer groups to explore ways to provide more
renewable energy options,” said Paul Newton, Duke Energy president – North Carolina.
“We are pleased to offer a new program that, if approved, may help to promote
economic development and growth of renewable energy in the region, and help our
customers achieve their sustainability goals.”
The Green Source Rider was filed Nov. 15 in North Carolina by Duke Energy Carolinas.
If approved, the program will be available to Duke Energy Carolinas customers served
on industrial rates OPT-G, OPT-H and OPT-I. Customers may elect to offset some or all
of their new load with energy generated from renewable energy sources.
“This is the first program Duke Energy has developed that gives customers the option to
purchase renewable energy to offset new energy consumption,” said Newton. “We
designed a program that responds to certain customer requests for more renewable
energy, but that does not adversely affect other customers.”
The complete Green Source Rider filing can be viewed here: http://www.dukeenergy.
com/pdfs/2013111501-addendum.pdf
Participating customers will make an application to Duke Energy Carolinas requesting
an annual amount of energy and renewable energy certificates to be produced or
procured over a specific term.

The company will then work to match the supply source and contract term request with
generation from a Duke Energy renewable energy source, or with energy supplied
through a power purchase agreement with a renewable energy supplier.
The electing customer will then enter into a contract with Duke Energy Carolinas
ranging from three to 15 years, depending on the terms of the agreement between Duke
Energy and the renewable energy supplier.
Both in-state and out-of-state renewable energy resources may be used to meet the
energy requirements of the program, depending on customer preference and availability
to meet contract needs.
Renewable energy generation used to meet customer needs through the Green Source
Rider is in addition to generation used for compliance with North Carolina’s renewable
energy portfolio standard.
The Green Source Rider was originally announced in April. Input was gathered from a
diverse stakeholder group, including customers, as part of the design process. The
proposed program is now under review by the NCUC.
Duke Energy Carolinas owns nuclear, coal-fired, natural gas and hydroelectric
generation. That diverse fuel mix provides approximately 20,000 megawatts of owned
electric capacity to approximately 2.4 million customers in a 24,000-square-mile service
area of North Carolina and South Carolina.
Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Duke Energy is a Fortune 250 company traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DUK. More information about the
company is available at: www.duke-energy.com.

Should solar PV panels face west to produce more power to reduce utility peak demand?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   November 18, 2013  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Are Solar Panels Facing the Wrong Direction?

Are Solar Panels Facing the Wrong Direction?

New study finds that west-facing panels are far superior for cutting peak demand.

Katherine Tweed
November 14, 2013

West-facing rooftop solar panels produced 49 percent more electricity during peak demand compared to south-facing panels, according to a new study from Pecan Street Research Institute.

The research is the first of its kind to evaluate the energy production of solar panels oriented in different directions. Pecan Street analyzed 50 homes in the Austin, Texas area. Some had only south-facing panels, others had west-facing panels, and some had both.

South-facing panels produced a 54 percent peak reduction overall, while west-facing solar PV panels produced a 65 percent peak reduction.

“There’s no other residential demand response tool generating 60 percent reductions,” said Brewster McCracken, CEO of Pecan Street. “Those are pretty extraordinary peak reductions.”

When the data was normalized for a 5.5-kilowatt system, the panels turned to the west generated nearly 50 percent more electricity during peak demand hours than did their southern-facing counterparts.

Homes with west-facing systems also produced slightly more electricity, with those panels producing 37 percent of total daily electricity use, compared to 35 percent for the south-facing panels.

During times of peak demand, which is defined as 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. in Texas's ERCOT territory, 84 percent of electricity in west-facing systems was used in the home.

The information could help inform utility rebate programs for rooftop solar panels and demand response programs. Most homes currently have south-facing panels. For the research, Pecan Street paid a premium to participants to induce them to turn their panels westward. If more utilities were to move to dynamic pricing models, where power cost more during days of high peak demand, west-facing panels could potentially be more attractive to certain households with high peak loads.

The next round of research will also include information about the pitch of the roof. Panels on flat roofs tend to have higher rates of electricity generation, but most homes in the U.S. have pitched roofs, as did all of the participants in the first study. Pecan Street will also look beyond Austin in the next stage of the study. McCracken said there are plans to include homes in Colorado, Dallas and potentially California.

Most of the world’s solar panels are facing the wrong direction

Quartz • November 15, 2013 • ,,,

By Christopher Mims @mims 5 hours ago

 AP Photo/Franklin Reyes

You’d think it would be easy: the sun is “up,” and, like leaves and basking reptiles, solar panels should face in that general direction. But most installers of solar panels, especially the ones for homes, follow conventional wisdom handed down from architects, which holds that in the northern hemisphere, windows and solar panels should face south.

This makes intuitive sense since it would seem to maximize the amount of sunlight a panel will get as the sun tracks from one horizon to the other. But it isn’t true, at least according to a single study of homes in Austin, Texas. The Pecan Street Research Institute found that homeowners who aimed their panels toward the west, instead of the south, generated 2% more electricity over the course of a day.

More importantly, those west-facing panels reduced household electricity usage during the times when electricity is most expensive—and power grids are most likely to become overloaded—by 65%, while south-facing panels only reduced usage during those times by 54%. In Texas, as in most places, those “peak times” are from 3pm to 7pm, and correspond with the heat of the day.

It’s obvious that west-facing solar panels produce more electricity later in the day, when the sun is setting in the west, but quantifying the way that favoring late-day sunlight helps homeowners save money and utilities flatten out demand could lead to a simple but effective hack for the world’s solar installers: Simply re-orienting solar panels could shorten the amount of time it takes for them to pay for themselves.

 

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG