Author Archives Laura Arnold

Michigan PSC Solar Working Group Looking at Recommending Community Solar Program: Should your state pursue community solar?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 07, 2014  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

May 04, 2014 8:00 AM

State group expected to suggest solar growth; will utilities comply?

A solar power work group in Michigan is making progress discussing the possibility of expanding the current utility-sponsored solar incentive program for customers and whether to recommend establishing a community solar program, say participants in the Michigan Public Service Commission-led group.

By most accounts, the group is expected to recommend an expansion of the existing solar power programs offered by DTE Energy Co. and Consumers Energy Co. and to embark on a community solar program in which customers, investors or utilities invest in a large solar panel array and share power generation and cost savings.

But the real question is whether DTE and Consumers will voluntarily expand their programs -- as environmentalists, manufacturers and solar installers have been asking the state to require for job creation and public health reasons -- before the programs expire in 2015.

In 2009, when Michigan's renewable energy and efficiency legislation (Public Act 295) went into effect, DTE began developing its SolarCurrents program and Consumers had its Experimental Advanced Renewable Program. Both programs provide financial incentives for residential and business customers to build and install photovoltaic systems.

DTE officials said the utility plans to produce nearly 2 percent of its 10 percent renewable energy required production from solar through its company-owned plants and residential and business programs. Consumers plans to produce 0.7 percent from its residential and business-only program, the company said.

State legislators have begun hearings on extending Michigan's renewable energy law.

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder has said he would support legislation increasing the state's 10 percent renewable energy mandate to possibly 20 percent over 10 years. He has not specifically addressed solar power other than to say that increasing Michigan-based renewable energy jobs is an important byproduct of his plan.

Last year, the Public Service Commission approved DTE's two-year renewable energy plan. However, it ordered the Detroit-based utility to participate in the work group. Jackson-based Consumers Energy, which is awaiting a hearing on its next renewable energy plan, voluntarily agreed to participate.

Julie Baldwin, Michigan Public Service Commission

Julie Baldwin, the commission's renewable energy section manager, said the work group's conclusions will not bind the utilities into changing their renewable energy plans, which are approved by the Public Service Commission.

"Most people have a concern that DTE's SolarCurrents program has not been big enough," Baldwin said. "When DTE makes solar capacity available, they have more people apply to participate than they have capacity. There have been suggestions to make the program larger."

A draft of the work group's report, which some group members say has begun, is expected to be completed by mid-June, when comments will be accepted. A final report will be released in July, Baldwin said.

Under the commission's DTE order last year, the work group is charged with determining ways to "improve DTE Electric's customer-owned SolarCurrents program, including means for incorporating community solar into the program."

Baldwin said the group is discussing three ways to design a community solar program. Consumers and DTE could voluntarily fund company-owned community solar projects; customers could invest in a joint solar panel project; or a third-party company could create a community solar project, take customer investments and sell solar energy to DTE or Consumers, she said.

David Harwood, DTE's director of renewable energy, said DTE has been supportive of the work group, and its five meetings so far have been productive.

"A lot of stakeholders just want more solar, but they don't have the background to understand how rates are developed with the Public Service Commission," said Harwood, who is a work group member.

Harwood said the group's charge to improve DTE's SolarCurrents "doesn't mean increase" the company's solar pilot program. He said the work group is trying to "figure out ways to make the program more efficient, fair or accessible."

Harwood said DTE fully intends to hit its 10 percent renewable goal by 2015. He said DTE is currently at 9.5 percent renewable production.

But Brad Klein, senior attorney with Chicago-based Environmental Law & Policy Center, who is a member of the work group, said DTE has accumulated $15 million in customer fees from its renewable energy surcharge that could be used to expand its SolarCurrents program.

"I'd like (the work group report) to make a strong recommendation that utilities take immediate steps to expand and improve their solar programs using monies they have already collected to support renewable energy in Michigan," Klein said.

Baldwin said prices have dropped for solar panel installation to less than $4 per watt from more than $10 per watt.

"DTE and Consumers can allocate that money to making more solar rebates available to customers," Klein said. "The money can be used to more cost-effectively fund the program. Right now, (solar installation) companies have to spend a lot of money helping customers get the incentives."

Baldwin said several solar installers told the work group that DTE's lottery system -- which the utility uses to narrow down the number of customers for its SolarCurrents program -- makes it very difficult for them to do business.

"We are hoping to improve on this," Baldwin said. "The installers spend a lot of time working with customers, answering questions, filling out the application, only to find out one or two months later were picked. Sometimes customers lose interest and drop out."

Doug Jester, a principal with 5 Lakes Energy LLC, a Lansing-based energy consulting firm, said the work group also has discussed future ways to analyze the value of solar from a price, quality-of-life and job-creation standpoint.

"The discussions (also) have focused on ... how to change the utility solar programs to get rid of the lotteries and other things that prevent customers from doing solar," Jester said.

Jester agreed that the success of the work group hinges on whether the utilities put the recommendations into action.

"We won't know whether they are actually going to do anything differently until some uncertain time after the staff report is finished," Jester said. "I remain cautiously optimistic that this will be modestly productive, but don't expect anything revolutionary."

Jay Greene: (313) 446-0325, jgreene@crain.com. Twitter: @jaybgreene

Ohio Governor John Kasich urges changes in ‘green energy’ bill; Did Kasich threaten veto of bill freezing renewable energy?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 05, 2014  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Ohio Gov. John Kasich

By Joe Vardon  and  Dan Gearino; Saturday May 3, 2014 5:54 AM

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/05/02/kasich-reportedly-threatens-to-veto-energy-standards-freeze-bill.html 

State legislative leaders and Gov. John Kasich could be headed for a showdown over a plan to limit increases in “green” energy required of utility companies.

A Republican-backed bill would lock in at current levels the amount of renewable energy that electricity companies are required to buy, instead of increasing it until 2025.

Sources told The Dispatch that Kasich told Republican Senate President Keith Faber and GOP House Speaker William G. Batchelder that he wants changes in the bill, and he might have threatened a veto.

Faber would neither confirm nor deny that Kasich made a veto threat, but he said, “The governor has made some suggestions of things he would like to see changed in the bill, and we are in the process of trying to see whether we can accommodate” them.

Senate Bill 310 would freeze the amount of solar, wind and other forms of renewable energy that electricity utilities are required to buy under a law passed in 2008.

Faber said the bill already had been destined to undergo changes before it is passed out of committee and the Senate.

“We need to understand what our disagreements are, and we need to understand how (Kasich’s) changes would work,” Faber said.

He said Kasich’s concerns are rooted “more in the application of the freeze than anything,” but he noted that he had not reviewed Kasich’s specific policy suggestions.

Sources also said that Faber suggested he might pursue an override of a veto. Faber wouldn’t confirm or deny that, either, but he said: “I anticipate we will pass a bill out of the Senate."

In a text message to The Dispatch, Kasich spokesman Rob Nichols said: “We don’t conduct our negotiations through the press, we are looking for common ground, and we’re confident we will find it.”

Supporters and opponents of the bill say they have heard that there is disagreement between legislative leaders and the governor, although sources indicate that Kasich didn’t raise his concerns until recently. The supporters say this is a normal part of passing a high-profile energy bill.

“I’m sure there’s a dialogue going on, as there always is,” said Sam Randazzo, an attorney for Industrial Energy Users-Ohio, a group that is one of the measure’s leading supporters.

Randazzo noted that the 2008 law, which set annual increases in renewable-energy standards through 2025, faced major ups and downs — including a veto threat by then-Gov. Ted Strickland late in the process.

The new bill would revise the parts of the 2008 law dealing with renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Republican Sen. Bill Seitz, a backer of the new bill, said he hopes the bill wins committee approval as soon as next week.

“We’re not done with the bill,” he said yesterday. “There are going to be amendments. We don’t quite know what those will look like yet, but I hope we will by Wednesday.”

The proposal has split the business community. It has the support of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and other statewide business groups, and of FirstEnergy, the Akron-based utility. It is opposed by key employers such as Honda and trade associations such as the Ohio Manufacturers’ Association. Also among the opponents are consumer advocates and environmental groups.

Opponents have tailored their message to the governor, pointing to studies that show the bill will cost the state jobs and lead to the elimination of popular programs that help consumers reduce their energy bills.

“Senate Bill 310 would be the death knell for a promising, high-growth Ohio industry still in its infancy,” said Ted Ford, president and CEO of Ohio Advanced Energy Economy, in an April 12 opinion piece in The Dispatch.

Ford used some of Kasich’s previous statements on energy to make the case, arguing that this bill would undermine the governor’s “well rounded” approach to energy policy.

jvardon@dispatch.com
dgearino@dispatch.com

RELATED ITEMS

Microgrid Interconnections and Energy Storage Topic for Conference May 5th at IUPUI

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 05, 2014  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

“Microgrid Interconnections and Energy Storage” by Lugar Renewable Energy Center, May 6th @ IUPUI

Spring Forum

Event Schedule

       Microgrid Interconnections and Energy Storage

Hosted by the Richard G. Lugar Center for Renewable Energy  &                            The Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI

Agenda

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

08:00-9:00  am    Registration and Continental Breakfast - networking opportunity    
 9:00 - 9:10 am    Welcome and Introduction

  • Dr. Peter J. Schubert, Director, Richard G. Lugar Center for Renewable Energy, IUPUI
 9:10 - 10:00 am    Keynote speaker

  • Pending, details are being finalized
 10:00 -10:20 am       Networking break - Poster and Model Displays
 10:25 - 11:00 am    Guest Speaker - "Back-up Power for Sochi"
Mr. Sean Hendrix, Chief of Engineering, EnerDel
 11:00 -12:00 pm    Panel Discussion - The Impact of Microgrids and Distributed Generation on Utility Grid StabilityModerator: Mr. Joe Bentley, Sr. VP Transmission & Distribution Ops, Indianapolis Power and Light

  •  Mr. Gary Gengenbach, Principal, MES
  •  Mr. Stephen Kozey, Sr. V.P. Legal and Compliance Serv., MISO
  •  Dr. Steven Rovnyak, Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, IUPUI
  •  Mr. Steve Tolen, President and CEO, Indy Power Systems
  12:00 -1:15 pm    Lunch with Keynote Speaker – Mr. Ken Geisler, VP Business Strategy, Smart Grid Division, Siemens Infrastructure and Cities Sector.
        *Note:  Vegan and dietary restriction lunch options are available upon request. 
  1:15 - 1:45 pm     Special Topic Speaker - Dr. Afshin Izadian, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology, IUPUI  
  1:45 - 2:15 pm    Special Topic Speaker - Dr. Fu Yongzhu, Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI, Advanced Materials for Rechargeable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries”
  2:15 - 2:30 pm   Break
  2:30 - 3:10 pm   Special Guest Speaker - Go Electric, “Blinkless Microgrid Technology, Seamless Integration of Renewable Power, Batteries & Generators to Improve Efficiency/Security and Reduce Costs”
 3:10 - 4:10 pm          Panel Dicussion - Benefits of Microgrid Deployment: System Robustness, Security to Critical Loads, Renewable Integration and Economics       Moderator:  Mr. Dusty Wilson, Director of Energy Systems, SAIC

  • Dr. David Goodman, Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering and Technology, IUPUI
  • Dr. Scott Sudhoff, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University
  • Dr. Elena Timofeeva, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
 4:10 - 5:30 pm     Microgrid Walking Tour on Campus  -  total walk time 22 minutes   

  • Solar Panel Installation, Roof of Business/SPEA
  • Energy Systems and Power Electronics Laboratory, ET 204
  • Computer Engineering and Research Lab;  SL113  

 

 

To register: lugarenergycenter.org

Click on "Spring Forum", Then  "Registration"

http://www.lugarenergycenter.org/index.php/events/

TASC: Minnesota Value of Solar tariff will ‘entrench monopoly’ of utilities’; Value of Solar (VOS) vs. Net Metering

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 01, 2014  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

TASC: Minnesota Value of Solar tariff will ‘entrench monopoly’ of utilities

  • rooftop
    Susan Wise of TASC argued that net metering was “not broken” and therefore did not need replacing.

Value of solar tariffs (VOST) of the type recently adopted in the US state of Minnesota create “serious instability for the solar industry”, according to US advocacy group The Alliance for Solar Choice (TASC).

The group has spoken out on the VOST, which could replace net metering. The policy is designed to account for the value of energy and its delivery, the available generation capacity, transmission capacity, losses on transmission and distribution lines and environmental value. At present it is up to the discretion of Minnesota utilities to decide whether or not to apply the VOST.

PV Tech spoke to Susan Glick and Kim Sanders of TASC about the issue. According to Glick, TASC has three major criticisms of VOSTs. Firstly, TASC believes that, as highlighted in a note by law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Florm, customers could be taxed for income generated from solar systems. Wise said this could also remove customers’ eligibility for investment tax credits (ITCs).

Secondly, according to TASC, the ‘buy-all, sell-all’ approach of the VOST removes customers’ ability to consume the energy that their systems produce.

Finally, the fact that it has been left to utilities to decide whether to adopt the VOST leaves utilities effectively in control of the rooftop solar market, TASC argues.

Earlier this month PV Tech received a report from John Farrell, senior researcher at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR). Farrell said that while the fact that environmental impacts were factored into the VOST was positive and that the debate might further discussions between solar companies and utilities, thus opening the way for dialogue, he shared concerns that it was left to utilities to decide on adoption.

Kim Sanders told PV Tech that factoring in the environmental benefits of solar is critical. That said, the VOST is calculated using utility inputs, which is inherently favourable to the utility.

Susan Glick said: "A lot of the focus on the impact of distributed generation (DG) solar comes from utilities. So when you go and you recalculate that tariff, the utilities are providing data for the valuation process that may seek to find a lower value of solar.”

Glick argued that net metering was “not broken” and therefore did not need replacing.

“Current net metering policies work. Utilities don’t like them, but that’s because they see them as feeding off their profits and their monopolies and the VOST, for specific reasons like the buy-all sell-all element, is to give control back to the utilities. They take that freedom away from the consumer.”

PV Tech asked if it was at least positive that the topic of correctly evaluating the cost of solar was being debated, to which Sanders replied that TASC welcomed a transparent conversation about the benefits and costs of solar, “that doesn’t necessarily translate to changing from the net metering policy”. According to TASC, the policy adds an unnecessary layer of complication to the debate between utilities and solar companies.

"I would also add to that that the VOST didn’t begin in these discussions [over the cost and benefit evaluation of solar]," added Sanders. "The discussions began when utilities recognised a 13 January report from Edison Electric Institute (EEI) that distributed generation in all forms was going to reduce sales for them and that would cause long-term implications for their business model."

PV Tech asked John Farrell for comment on the TASC criticisms of the policy. Farrell said that he broadly agreed with several of the points raised. He reiterated concerns that the utilities “get to choose” between VOST and net metering, pointing out that the “original legislation in Minnesota (not what was adopted) gave customers the choice.”

He did, however say that it was still “not a done deal that using VOST will make issues for individuals with taxable income and tax credits” and did point out that as far as tax credits were concerned, “even if VOST makes a person ineligible for the personal ITC, they become eligible for the business ITC and depreciation,” which stands at between 15% and 20%.

Despite sharing the main concern of TASC, that power to adopt VOST remained in the hands of utilities, Farrell said that he didn’t think VOST was necessarily a worse deal than net metering, even if it added tax liability for customers.

“In Minnesota, for example, the value of solar may be higher than the net metering rate, even with potential tax liability. Or, as implemented in Minnesota, the long-term, fixed-price contract might mean lower financing costs (interest rates) that offset a price difference. In other words, it's just one part of the total picture of solar producer compensation,” Farrell said.

Finally, in defence of the new policy – at least in theory – Farrell said that while TASC may be right about some of the implications of VOST, in some regions, it could be easier for VOST to enjoy greater popular support than net metering.

“TASC may be right about the relative merits of net metering versus value of solar now, but in the near future sticking with net metering may threaten popular support for solar power because it will offer excessive profits for solar producers relative to its grid value,” said Farrell.

LIPA: How Solar Is Cutting Grid Costs

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 01, 2014  /   Posted in Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), Uncategorized  /   No Comments

How Solar Is Cutting Grid Costs

John Farrell 

April 29, 2014

With solar power, “we can avoid that $100 million investment in transmission lines, distribution lines, in capital infrastructure…”

That was Vice President of Environmental Affairs Michael Deering of the Long Island Power Authority in a remarkable podcast interview, explaining how local solar energy can help offset expensive grid upgrades for bringing in remote power generation, as much as $100 million worth.

Listen in to the podcast (recorded via Skype on 11/25/13) for the full story, or read the summary below for more on why one of the country's biggest municipal utilities is looking to solar to meet their growing energy demand.

Podcast (Local Energy Rules): Play in new window | Download | Embed

 

Energy to Power the Economy

A key focus for the Long Island utility was the economic and environmental benefits of solar, not just the power generation. Solar power did have significant grid benefits and it reduced costly pollution, but Deering emphasized how solar built on Long Island means jobs and economic development on Long Island.

Energy for Peak Needs

The Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) isn’t new to customer-owned solar.  They launched their first solar rebate program in 2001, and now have solar on over 7,300 homes and businesses on Long Island.  They’ve added another 50 megawatts (MW) with a few utility-scale projects, and then launched a feed-in tariff program encouraging commercial-scale solar (50 to 500 kilowatts) in 2012.  In total, the utility will have 170 MW of solar installed by the end of 2014, sufficient to meet about 3% of its peak demand.

Local Energy with High Value

LIPA isn’t a typical municipal utility.  It’s literally at the “end of the line” of the power grid and its limited capacity to import power puts a premium on locally generated energy.  The new iteration of the utility's feed-in tariff program, launched in 2013, asks for 40 percent of the power to be developed on the south fork of Long Island (Montauk).  If it works as planned, the utility will pay an additional 7¢ per kilowatt-hour for energy from those solar projects, using that prime-time energy to defer big investments in new transmission power lines and power plants.

What’s Next for Long Island power?

LIPA has plans to procure more large-scale renewable energy through a 280-MW request for proposal in 2014 as well as a third, 20-MW iteration of its popular feed-in tariff program — this time focused on non-solar renewable energy technologies.

You can learn more about feed-in tariff programs from ILSR's 2012 report or about the way utilities are valuing solar power from ILSR's recently released report on Minnesota's Value of Solar policy or blog series on Minnesota’s value of solar law.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG