Author Archives Laura Arnold

Solar Energy’s New Best Friend is the Christian Coalition; Indiana Fight Over Net Metering

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 21, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/02/20/solar-energys-new-best-friend-is-the-christian-coalition/

February 20 at 2:18 PM

The politics of solar power keep getting more and more interesting.

In the state of Indiana, a fight over net metering — basically, whether people with rooftop solar can return their excess power to the grid, and thereby lower their utility bills — has drawn out groups ranging from the state chapter of the NAACP to the conservative TUSK (“Tell Utilities Solar won’t be Killed”) in favor the practice.

Arrayed on the other side of the issue, meanwhile, are the Indiana Energy Association, a group of utilities, and Republican Rep. Eric Koch, sponsor of a bill that would potentially change how net metering works in the state. The legislation, in its current form, would let utility companies ask the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to include various “tariffs, rates and charges, and credits” for those customers generating their own energy at home.

Net metering advocates charge that this would reduce how much money rooftop solar installers save on their electricity bills. But the bill’s supporters say it will “level the playing field to ensure that all of those who use the electric grid — whether consuming or generating power — are paying for its upkeep,” in the words of the Indiana Energy Association.

Forty-three states and the District of Columbia currently allow net metering — among them, Indiana. The fight is important because the solar industry in the state, and the number of people installing rooftop solar, is expected to grow in coming years — that is, so long as solar remains a good deal financially.

What’s particularly fascinating is how this debate has mobilized the religious community. Solar panels are going up on church rooftops in Indiana, and on Wednesday, the head of the Christian Coalition of America wrote a blog post favoring solar and referring specifically to the Indiana fight (although without getting into the technical details of net metering).

Roberta Combs, president of the group, entitled her post “For God and Country, Indiana and America Need Better Energy Policies,” writing:

Indiana’s utilities are interested in keeping us reliant on traditional fuel sources that hurt our national security and weaken our economy. We must allow homes, businesses, public organizations, and churches to create local, American power by installing solar.

As conservatives, we stand up for our country’s national security and the health of our economy. And, as Christians, we recognize the biblical mandate to care for God’s creation and protect our children’s future.

This is not the first time that Combs has come out for an initiative that might be described as “green.” She previously supported efforts by Secretary of State John Kerry, former senator Joe Lieberman, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to battle global warming. Her daughter, Michele Combs, is the founder of a group called Young Conservatives for Energy Reform, which stands for “weaning our nation from foreign oil, boosting efficiency, and developing homegrown alternatives from natural gas to biofuels to wind and solar.”

“This whole concept of conservative support for solar has certainly gotten a lot of attention, but this is the most remarkable chapter in the story,” says Bryan Miller, who co-chairs the Alliance for Solar Choice, which advocates in favor of net metering across the country. “We’ve seen a lot of grassroots activism for sure, but we haven’t seen a major national group, associated with the far right of American politics, coming out on a renewable energy issue.”

The reason this has happened in Indiana, suggests Miller, is that “we’ve had houses of worship who have gone solar, speaking out about this for weeks.” The Christian Coalition did not immediately return requests for comment.

Energy in the U.S. is changing so fast, it seems, that politics barely knows how to adapt to it. .

Chrisitian Coalition: For God and Country, Indiana and America Need Better Energy Policies

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 21, 2015  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   1 Comments

Home

Christian Coalition of America

February 18, 2015 - 12:42pm — Roberta Combs

At the Christian Coalition, we believe that America needs to develop its own energy resources, for the sake of national security and economic health. Right now, the United States sends about a billion dollars a day to other countries to pay for what former President George W. Bush called our “addiction to oil.” Much of that money goes to countries that do not share our values. Some of the money goes to regimes that we would consider our enemies. There is evidence some of it ends up in the pockets of terrorists, and even funding our troops’ opponents on the battlefield.

Now is the time to break our dependence on foreign oil. But more domestic supply alone cannot solve the problem. The United States uses about a quarter of the world’s oil, but only controls 2 to 3 percent of the Earth’s known petroleum reserves, and we cannot drill enough at home to bridge that gap.

If we want to build a stronger economy and a stronger nation, we need a comprehensive, “made in America” approach. That means everything from domestic oil and natural gas, to nuclear power, bio-fuels, wind, geothermal, and solar. We need to support home grown energy that will not run out, and that puts Americans to work while returning dollars to our own economy. We can make a change today, here in Indiana as well as at the state level around the country.

Nowhere is this issue more front-and-center right now than in Indiana. We support efficiency and homegrown energy sources that would keep Hoosiers’ dollars here in Indiana. Indiana’s utilities are interested in keeping us reliant on traditional fuel sources that hurt our national security and weaken our economy. We must allow homes, businesses, public organizations, and churches to create local, American power by installing solar.

As conservatives, we stand up for our country’s national security and the health of our economy. And, as Christians, we recognize the biblical mandate to care for God’s creation and protect our children’s future.

We join a multitude of American and Hoosier voices raised in support of efficiency and next-generation energy sources including solar energy. Veterans and national security groups, business organizations, public health groups, and churches—all understand the importance of what is at stake.

Rep. Eric Koch Announces House Utilities to Meet on 2/18/15 at 1:30 pm to hear HB 1320

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 16, 2015  /   Posted in 2015 Indiana General Assembly, solar, wind  /   No Comments

Rep. Eric Koch (R-Bedford) just announced from the microphone shortly before 7:00 pm this evening after all the other Committee announcements were made that

 

House Utilities Committee will meet

Wed., February 18 at 1:30 pm

in Room 156-B of the State House

to hear HB 1320 distributed generation

and net metering!

No other information was provided.

Game on, people!

Visit this link to send a message to House Utilities Committee Members:

http://action.dontkillsolar.com/page/speakout/hoosiers-don-t-let-monopoly-utilities-kill-your-right-to-choose-solar-?js=false

HB 1142 Eliminating solar attic fan and home insulation tax deduction passes House; Why?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 16, 2015  /   Posted in 2015 Indiana General Assembly, solar  /   No Comments

Today (2/16/15) the Indiana House of Representatives voted by a vote of 94 to 2 on Third Reading and Final Passage in the House on HB 1142 which eliminates the Indiana insulation tax deduction and the solar attic fan tax deduction.

The two state legislators who voted "NO" are:

Rep. Ryan Dvorak (D-South Bend)

Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington)

IndianaDG send a BIG "Thank you"

to Rep. Dvorak and Pierce

for voting "NO" on HB 1142.

The Fiscal Impact Statement Summaraizes HB 1142 as follows:

Summary of Legislation: Tax Incentive Review: The bill specifies that the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) (rather than the Commission on State Tax and Financing Policy or its successor committee, under current law) shall before October 1 of each year conduct the review, analysis, and evaluation of all tax incentives under House Enrolled Act 1020-2014, according to a schedule developed by the LSA. It requires the LSA to submit the results of the review, analysis, and evaluation to the Legislative Council and the Interim Study Committee on Fiscal Policy. The bill requires the Interim Study Committee on Fiscal Policy to hold an annual public hearing after September 30 and before November 1 of each year at which: (1) the LSA presents its review, analysis, and evaluation of tax incentives; and (2) the interim study committee receives information concerning tax incentives. It requires the InterimStudy Committee on Fiscal Policy to submit to the Legislative Council any recommendations made by the interim study committee that are related to the LSA’s review, analysis, and evaluation of tax incentives prepared under this section. The bill requires the LSA to provide information to be used by the General Assembly to make certain determinations regarding tax incentives. (Current law requires the LSA to make these determinations.)

Tax Expenditure Report: The bill requires the LSA to prepare and publish a tax expenditure report before November 1 of each even-numbered year. It specifies the required elements of the tax expenditure report. Repeal of Deductions: The bill repeals the home insulation deduction and the solar-powered roof vent and fan deduction.

Effective Date: Upon passage; January 1, 2016.

Explanation of State Expenditures: Summary- The changes made by the bill to the tax incentive review program and the tax expenditure reporting requirement established in the bill can be implemented by LSA within current resources. The Department of State Revenue will incur additional expenses to revise tax forms, instructions, and computer programs to reflect the repeal of the home insulation deduction and the solar-powered roof vent/fan installation deduction. The DOR's current level of resources should be sufficient to implement these changes.

Explanation of State Revenues: Summary- The bill repeals the home insulation deduction and the solar powered roof vent/fan installation deduction effective beginning in tax year 2016. The revenue gain from the repeal of the deductions would begin in FY 2017. Both deductions may be claimed under the individual adjusted gross income (AGI) tax which is distributed to the state General Fund. The estimated revenue gain is specified in the table below.

The revenue gain could potentially grow by 1%-2% annually thereafter.

Provision FY 2017

Home Insulation Deduction: $1.1 M

Solar-Powered Roof Vent/Fan Installation Deduction: $6,000

Total: $1.1 M

Additional Information- The home insulation deduction may be claimed against an individual taxpayer’s AGI. The maximum deduction is equal to $1,000 for the material and professional installation costs of insulation and insulating products installed in the taxpayer’s principal place of residence. The solar-powered roof vent/fan installation deductionmay be claimed against an individual taxpayer’s AGI. The deduction is equal to 50% of the total installation cost, both materials and labor, up to $1,000 for the installation of a solar-powered roof fan/vent on a building the taxpayer owns or leases.

Explanation of Local Expenditures: Explanation of Local Revenues: Because the repeal of the deductions will increase state taxable income of individuals, counties imposing a local option income tax (LOIT) could experience an increase in LOIT collections. Based on the median LOIT rate of 1.45%, collections on a statewide basis could increase by an estimated $500,000 annually in 2018.

State Agencies Affected:

General Assembly; Legislative Services Agency; Department of State Revenue.

Local Agencies Affected: Information Sources:

Legislative Services Agency, Indiana Tax Incentive Review, November 2014.

Fiscal Analyst: Jim Landers, 317-232-9869.

Here is the link to Roll Call #135 on HB 1142>

 http://iga.in.gov/static-documents/d/a/b/b/dabb5e17/HB1142.135.pdf

To read a copy of HB 1142 see >

http://iga.in.gov/static-documents/8/9/b/5/89b50ae7/HB1142.02.COMH.pdf

The Senate sponsor of HB 1142 is Sen. Brandt Hershman.

Duke Energy: Ramping Up Its Solar Ambitions with Stake in REC Solar but Why Indiana HB 1320?

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   February 14, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Duke Energy: Ramping Up Its Solar Ambitions

Feb. 12, 2015 9:30 AM ET  |  5 comments  |  About: Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)

Disclosure: The author is long SCTY. (More...)

Summary

  • Duke Energy has acquired a majority stake in REC Solar, which should allow Duke Energy to stake a foothold in the promising distributed solar markets.
  • Duke Energy and REC Solar make for an incredibly synergistic partnership, with Duke Energy providing for cheap capital and influence, and with REC Solar providing for its experience an talent.
  • Because REC Solar's business directly conflicts with Duke Energy's centralized fossil fuels business, such an acquisition will only be worthwhile if distributed solar eventually becomes the dominant electricity generation model.
  • Duke Energy is smart to expand its renewable energy profile, especially in light of solar's continually increasing cost-effectiveness and its exponential growth path.

The fight between utility companies and distributed solar companies have heated up markedly over the past year. Some major utilities have even started resorting to underhanded tactics, such as influencing congressmen to do their bidding. While most utilities are trying to quash distributed solar, the savvy utility companies are embracing the change. Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) has been one of the rare few utilities that have actually seen the rise of distributed solar as a huge opportunity.

Duke Energy is currently the largest electricity holding company in the U.S., and has assets all over North and South America. While Duke Energy has a huge reliance on fossil fuels, which has been essential for the vast majority of the its business, the company is slowly making a transition to solar. Unlike most other utilities, Duke Energy is incorporating solar not as a means of meeting federal requirements, but to ensure the company's survival in a rapidly changing energy landscape. In fact, Duke Energy already has more renewable assets than many of the top renewable companies, with a sizable renewables portfolio consisting of around 1.8 GW worth of solar and wind assets. There are few other fossil fuel based utilities doing the same, with NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG) being almost the sole exception.

Duke Energy has reaffirmed its commitment to solar by acquiring a majority state in REC Solar, which focuses on distributed commercial installations. Duke Energy is willing to invest up to $225M into REC, with the clear intentions of trying to stake a foothold in the commercial solar sector. REC Solar will operate under Duke Energy Renewables(which is the green arm of Duke Energy) and should benefit tremendously from Duke Energy's financial clout and low costs of capital. As per Duke Energy CEO Allen Bucknam,

"We plan to extend the benefits of clean, distributed energy solutions to previously underserved small and medium-sized businesses," and that "The Duke Energy relationship realizes our strategy to be the one-stop shop for commercial solar by securing a predictable and streamlined customer financing process."

This is what a typical commercial REC Solar install looks like.

(click to enlarge)

Source: REC Solar

The Importance of Maintaining an Early Foothold

The utilities sector has seen little to no change in over a century, which means that sudden industry change likely seems extremely threatening, and even alien to most utilities. This could explain why the majority of utilities have been violently opposed to the proliferation of distributed solar companies such as SolarCity (NASDAQ:SCTY). Instead of working with these companies, which would likely end up being better for everyone involved, most of these companies are fighting tooth and nail to resist change.

Duke Solar is clearly an anomaly in this sense, not only accepting such change, but actually transitioning its business model to become more solar friendly. The company's majority stake in REC Solar leaves no doubt about the company's renewable ambitions. Not only does REC Solar's business model come in direct conflict with that of Duke Energy's, but it also represents an existential threat to the company's centralized business model. Instead of combating such REC Solar, Duke Energy has gone the infinitely wiser route of acquiring it.

By controlling REC Solar's commercial solar operations, Duke Energy will have a foothold into the promising ditsributed solar sector. Because the vast majority of Duke Energy's business is based upon centralized fossil fuel generation, the acquisition of a distributed solar company seems counterproductive at best. That is, for every distributed solar customer that Duke Energy signs up, that is one less customer for its main centralized business. While this is a no-win situation for Duke Energy, the company is looking at the long-term energy landscape, where distributed generation may very likely replace centralized generation.

Without staking a foothold in the distributed solar sector now, Duke Energy may become obsolete later on. At the relatively small cost of $225M, Duke Energy is setting itself up for future success in an immensely promising market. While $225M is a sizable sum of money for the solar sector, it is merely pocket change for the $60B valuated Duke Energy.

Incredible Synergy

Duke Energy's acquisition of REC Solar should amount to some incredibly synergistic effects, especially in financial and political matters. Despite all the talk about distributed solar's coming dominance, this form of electricity generation currently only amounts to below 1% of total electricity generation, which unfortunately results in a lack of perceived credibility and influence. This is of course where Duke Energy can fill the void, and in return, Duke Energy gets REC Solar's talent and years of solar industry experience.

The distributed solar industry has traditionally suffered from high capital costs, largely due to solar PV's relatively novel technology. While solar PV has been around for 40+ years, the technology has not seen statistically significant adoption until the last decade or so. Because finance companies have had so little to work on in terms of accessing solar PV's stability/reliance, such high capital costs are not at all surprising.

REC Solar's capital costs have been no exception in this regard, which makes its Duke Energy partnership perfect for this situation. Duke Energy Renewables has billions on its balance sheet, which should drastically lower REC Solar's capital costs. Instead of trying to find outside funding for its commercial projects, REC Energy could now go directly to Duke Energy. A lowered cost of capital means that REC Energy would be able to increase its profit margins, expand its commercial operations, or both. This, of course, also benefits Duke Energy.

What makes Duke Energy's acquisition of REC Solar particularly intriguing is if/how Duke Energy will be able to leverage its financial clout to influence politics. For instance, the company's renewable arm has the majority of its solar assets in North Carolina, which unfortunately does not allow for solar leases/PPAs. While traditional distributed solar companies have nowhere near the political clout to significantly alter North Carolina's state policies/laws, Duke Energy has more than enough influence to do so(especially considering the fact that the company is based out of North Carolina). If Duke Energy chose to support the legalization of leases/PPAs in the state, REC Solar would benefit tremendously, which would in turn benefit Duke Energy.

With such a powerful utility heavyweight entering the distributed solar game, it will be interesting to see how Duke Energy deals with policies negatively impacting solar leasing/PPA. On one hand, these policies help Duke Energy's core business of centralized fossil fuel generation, but on the other hand, they would severely limit its distributed REC Solar business. Given Duke Energy's seemingly forward looking nature, it is likely that the company will aid in trying to eliminate such policies, at least in its home state of North Carolina.

Risks and Obstacles

As was previously stated, REC Energy's business comes in directly conflict with Duke Energy's main business of centralized generation. If distributed solar does end up dominating the electricity generation scene, this will prove to be an ingenious acquisition. If such a scenario does not play out though, REC Solar would likely just be taking revenue from Duke Energy's main business, resulting in a zero-sum game. This could even turn out to be negative-sum game considering all the time and effort that would likely be put into REC Solar.

In addition, REC Solar's business primarily deals with the distributed commercial sector, which has struggled to grow over the past few years. Duke Energy may have a harder time than anticipated in growing REC Solar's commercial business due to the numerous problems plaguing the commercial solar sector(i.e. lack of efficiency, standardization, etc). While such problems are possible to overcome, they will nevertheless represent daunting obstacles for Duke Energy's REC Solar acquisition.

Conclusion

Duke Energy is one of the largest energy companies in the world, having over 7 million customers in North America alone. Despite making its fortune on fossil fuels, the company is smart enough to realize that centralized fossil fuel dominance will not last forever. The company's transition into renewables, and more importantly, distributed solar, will prove to be key for the company's future success. With a valuataion of $60B and a P/E ratio of 19, the company still has upside due to its increasing involvement in the immensely promising solar market.

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG