Author Archives Laura Arnold

Final Clean Power Plan for Indiana

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 03, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

US EPA logo

Clean Power Plan: State at a Glance

Indiana

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/cpptoolbox/indiana.pdf 

Here is the actual rule:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/cpp/cpp-final-rule.pdf

More important docs can be found here:  http://www2.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan/clean-power-plan-existing-power-plants#CPP-final


In the final Clean Power Plan (CPP), EPA is establishing interim and final carbon dioxide emission performance rates for the two types of electric generating units - steam electric and natural gas fired power plants - under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The CPP also establishes state-specific interim and final goals for each state, based on these limits and each state’s mix of power plants. The goals are expressed in two ways—rate-based and mass-based— either of which can be used by the state in its plan. States that choose a mass-based goal must assure that carbon pollution reductions from existing units achieved under the Clean Power Plan do not lead to increases in emissions from new sources. EPA is offering an option to simplify this requirement for states developing plans to achieve mass-based goals. If a state chooses this route, its state planning requirements are streamlined, avoiding the need to meet additional plan requirements and include additional elements.

EPA has a "goal visualizer" tool on the web at www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplantoolbox that walks through the exact calculations for Indiana.

Indiana’s Interim (2022-2029) and Final Goals (2030) See Table from link above

1. EPA made some targeted baseline adjustments at the state level to address commenter concerns about the representativeness of baseline-year data. These are highlighted in the CO2 Emission Performance Rate and Goal Computation TSD.

2, 3, 4. Note that states may elect to set their own milestones for Interim Step Periods 1, 2, and 3 as long as they meet the interim and final goals articulated in the emission guidelines. In its state plan, the state must define its interim step milestones and demonstrate how it will achieve these milestones, as well as the interim goal and final goal. See section VIII.B of the final rule preamble for more information.

The final Clean Power Plan goals for Indiana look different from the proposed goals – the 2030 goal looks more stringent, and the interim goal looks more stringent. [Emphasis added]

States' goals fall in a narrower band, reflecting a more consistent approach among sources and states.

At final, all state goals fall in a range between 771 pounds per megawatt-hour (states that have only natural gas plants) to 1,305 pounds per megawatt-hour (states that only have coal/oil plants). A state’s goal is based on how many of each of the two types of plants are in the state.

The goals are much closer together than at proposal. Compared to proposal, the highest (least stringent) goals got tighter, and the lowest (most stringent) goals got looser.

Indiana’s 2030 goal is 1,242 pounds per megawatt-hour. That’s on the high end of this range, meaning Indiana has one of the least stringent state goals, compared to other state goals in the final Clean Power Plan.

Indiana’s step 1 interim goal of 1,578 pounds per megawatt-hour reflects changes EPA made to provide a smoother glide path and less of a “cliff” at the beginning of the program.

The 2012 baseline for Indiana was adjusted to be more representative, based on information that came in during the comment period.

Pathway to 2030: While EPA’s projections show Indiana and its power plants will need to continue to work to reduce CO2 emissions and take additional action to reach its goal in 2030, these rates – and that state goal – are reasonable and achievable because no plant and no state has to meet them alone or all at once. They are designed to be met as part of the grid and over time. In fact, the rates themselves, and Indiana's goal, reflect the inherent flexibility in the way the power system operates and the variety of ways in which the electricity system can deliver a broad range of opportunities for compliance for power plants and states. EPA made improvements in the final rule specifically for the purpose of ensuring that states and power plants could rely on the electricity system’s inherent flexibility and the changes already under way in the power sector to find affordable pathways to compliance.

  • Flexibility in state plans and easier access to trading programs. States can use EPA’s model trading rules or write their own plan that includes trading with other “trading-ready” states, whether they are using a mass- or rate-based plan.
  • Clean Energy Incentive Program available for early investments. This program supports renewable energy projects – and energy efficiency in low-income communities – in 2020 and 2021.
  • The period for mandatory reductions begins in 2022, and there is a smoother glide path to 2030. The glide path gradually “steps” down the amount of carbon pollution. Note that states may elect to set their own milestones for interim step periods 1, 2 and 3 as long as they meet the interim goal overall or “on average” over the course of the interim period, and meet the final goals, established in the emission guidelines. To accomplish this, in its state plan, the state must define its interim step milestones and demonstrate how it will achieve these milestones, as well as the overall interim, and final, goals.
  • Energy efficiency available for compliance. Demand-side EE is an important, proven strategy that states and utilities are already widely using, and that can substantially and cost-effectively lower CO2 emissions from the power sector. EPA anticipates that, thanks to their low costs and large potential in every state and region, demand-side EE programs will be a significant component of state compliance plans under the Clean Power Plan. The CPP's flexible compliance options allow states to fully deploy EE to help meet their state goals.

 

Regional Point of Contact for Questions:
Alexis Cain / EPA Region 5
312-886-7018
cain.alexis@epa.gov

 

Want to know about other states?

See Clean Power Plan State-Specific Fact Sheets

 

President Obama to Announce Historic Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants at 2:15 pm EDT

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   August 03, 2015  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release: August 03, 2015

Watch on-line today (8/3/2015) at 2:15 pm EDT at https://www.whitehouse.gov/live/president-obama-speaks-clean-power-plan

The Clean Power Plan is a Landmark Action to Protect Public Health, Reduce Energy Bills for Households and Businesses, Create American Jobs, and Bring
Clean Power to Communities across the Country

Today at the White House, President Obama and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy will release the final Clean Power Plan, a historic step in the Obama Administration’s fight against climate change.

We have a moral obligation to leave our children a planet that’s not polluted or damaged. The effects of climate change are already being felt across the nation. In the past three decades, the percentage of Americans with asthma has more than doubled, and climate change is putting those Americans at greater risk of landing in the hospital. Extreme weather events – from more severe droughts and wildfires in the West to record heat waves – and sea level rise are hitting communities across the country. In fact, 14 of the 15 warmest years on record have all occurred in the first 15 years of this century and last year was the warmest year ever. The most vulnerable among us – including children, older adults, people with heart or lung disease, and people living in poverty – are most at risk from the impacts of climate change. Taking action now is critical.

The Clean Power Plan establishes the first-ever national standards to limit carbon pollution from power plants. We already set limits that protect public health by reducing soot and other toxic emissions, but until now, existing power plants, the largest source of carbon emissions in the United States, could release as much carbon pollution as they wanted.

The final Clean Power Plan sets flexible and achievable standards to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030, 9 percent more ambitious than the proposal. By setting carbon pollution reduction goals for power plants and enabling states to develop tailored implementation plans to meet those goals, the Clean Power Plan is a strong, flexible framework that will:

  • Provide significant public health benefits – The Clean Power Plan, and other policies put in place to drive a cleaner energy sector, will reduce premature deaths from power plant emissions by nearly 90 percent in 2030 compared to 2005 and decrease the pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog and can lead to more asthma attacks in kids by more than 70 percent. The Clean Power Plan will also avoid up to 3,600 premature deaths, lead to 90,000 fewer asthma attacks in children, and prevent 300,000 missed work and school days.
  • Create tens of thousands of jobs while ensuring grid reliability;
  • Drive more aggressive investment in clean energy technologies than the proposed rule, resulting in 30 percent more renewable energy generation in 2030 and continuing to lower the costs of renewable energy.
  • Save the average American family nearly $85 on their annual energy bill in 2030, reducing enough energy to power 30 million homes, and save consumers a total of $155 billion from 2020-2030;
  • Give a head start to wind and solar deployment and prioritize the deployment of energy efficiency improvements in low-income communities that need it most early in the program through a Clean Energy Incentive Program; and
  • Continue American leadership on climate change by keeping us on track to meet the economy-wide emissions targets we have set, including the goal of reducing emissions to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and to 26-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025.

KEY FEATURES OF THE CLEAN POWER PLAN

The final Clean Power Plan takes into account the unprecedented input EPA received through extensive outreach, including the 4 million comments that were submitted to the agency during the public comment period. The result is a fair, flexible program that will strengthen the fast-growing trend toward cleaner and lower-polluting American energy. The Clean Power Plan significantly reduces carbon pollution from the electric power sector while advancing clean energy innovation, development, and deployment. It ensures the U.S. will stay on a path of long-term clean energy investments that will maintain the reliability of our electric grid, promote affordable and clean energy for all Americans, and continue United States leadership on climate action. The Clean Power Plan:   

  • Provides Flexibility to States to Choose How to Meet Carbon Standards: EPA’s Clean Power Plan establishes carbon pollution standards for power plants, called carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates. States develop and implement tailored plans to ensure that the power plants in their state meet these standards– either individually, together, or in combination with other measures like improvements in renewable energy and energy efficiency. The final rule provides more flexibility in how state plans can be designed and implemented, including: streamlined opportunities for states to include proven strategies like trading and demand-side energy efficiency in their plans, and allows states to develop “trading ready” plans to participate in “opt in” to an emission credit trading market with other states taking parallel approaches without the need for interstate agreements. All low-carbon electricity generation technologies, including renewables, energy efficiency, natural gas, nuclear and carbon capture and storage, can play a role in state plans.
  • More Time for States Paired With Strong Incentives for Early Deployment of Clean Energy: State plans are due in September of 2016, but states that need more time can make an initial submission and request extensions of up to two years for final plan submission.  The compliance averaging period begins in 2022 instead of 2020, and emission reductions are phased in on a gradual “glide path” to 2030. These provisions to give states and companies more time to prepare for compliance are paired with a new Clean Energy Incentive Program to drive deployment of renewable energy and low-income energy efficiency before 2022.
  • Creates Jobs and Saves Money for Families and Businesses: The Clean Power Plan builds on the progress states, cities, and businesses and have been making for years. Since the beginning of 2010, the average cost of a solar electric system has dropped by half and wind is increasingly competitive nationwide. The Clean Power Plan will drive significant new investment in cleaner, more modern and more efficient technologies, creating tens of thousands of jobs. Under the Clean Power Plan, by 2030, renewables will account for 28 percent of our capacity, up from 22 percent in the proposed rule. Due to these improvements, the Clean Power Plan will save the average American nearly $85 on their energy bill in 2030, and save consumers a total of $155 billion through 2020-2030, reducing enough energy to power 30 million homes.
  • Rewards States for Early Investment in Clean Energy, Focusing on Low-Income Communities: The Clean Power Plan establishes a Clean Energy Incentive Program that will drive additional early deployment of renewable energy and low-income energy efficiency. Under the program, credits for electricity generated from renewables in 2020 and 2021 will be awarded to projects that begin construction after participating states submit their final implementation plans. The program also prioritizes early investment in energy efficiency projects in low-income communities by the Federal government awarding these projects double the number of credits in 2020 and 2021. Taken together, these incentives will drive faster renewable energy deployment, further reduce technology costs, and lay the foundation for deep long-term cuts in carbon pollution. In addition, the Clean Energy Incentive Plan provides additional flexibility for states, and will increase the overall net benefits of the Clean Power Plan.
  • Ensures Grid Reliability: The Clean Power Plan contains several important features to ensure grid reliability as we move to cleaner sources of power. In addition to giving states more time to develop implementation plans, starting compliance in 2022, and phasing in the targets over the decade, the rule requires states to address reliability in their state plans. The final rule also provides a “reliability safety valve” to address any reliability challenges that arise on a case-by-case basis. These measures are built on a framework that is inherently flexible in that it does not impose plant-specific requirements and provides states flexibility to smooth out their emission reductions over the period of the plan and across sources.
  • Continues U.S. Leadership on Climate Change: The Clean Power Plan continues United States leadership on climate change. By driving emission reductions from power plants, the largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Clean Power Plan builds on prior Administration steps to reduce emissions, including historic investments to deploy clean energy technologies, standards to double the fuel economy of our cars and light trucks, and steps to reduce methane pollution. Taken together these measures put the United States on track to achieve the President’s near-term target to reduce emissions in the range of 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and lay a strong foundation to deliver against our long-term target to reduce emissions 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. The release of the Clean Power Plan continues momentum towards international climate talks in Paris in December, building on announcements to-date of post-2020 targets by countries representing 70 percent of global energy based carbon emissions.
  • Sets State Targets in a Way That Is Fair and Is Directly Responsive to Input from States, Utilities, and Stakeholders: In response to input from stakeholders, the final Clean Power Plan modifies the way that state targets are set by using an approach that better reflects the way the electricity grid operates, using updated information about the cost and availability of clean generation technologies, and establishing separate emission performance rates for all coal plants and all gas plants.
  • Maintains Energy Efficiency as Key Compliance Tool: In addition to on-site efficiency and greater are reliance on low and zero carbon generation, the Clean Power Plan provides states with broad flexibility to design carbon reduction plans that include energy efficiency and other emission reduction strategies.  EPA’s analysis shows that energy efficiency is expected to play a major role in meeting the state targets as a cost-effective and widely-available carbon reduction tool, saving enough energy to power 30 million homes and putting money back in ratepayers’ pockets.
  • Requires States to Engage with Vulnerable Populations: The Clean Power Plan includes provisions that require states to meaningfully engage with low-income, minority, and tribal communities, as the states develop their plans. EPA also encourages states to engage with workers and their representatives in the utility and related sectors in developing their state plans.
  • Includes a Proposed Federal Implementation Plan: EPA is also releasing a proposed federal plan today. This proposed plan will provide a model states can use in designing their plans, and when finalized, will be a backstop to ensure that the Clean Power Plan standards are met in every state. 

Since the Clean Air Act became law more than 45 years ago with bipartisan support, the EPA has continued to protect the health of communities, in particular those vulnerable to the impacts of harmful air pollution, while the economy has continued to grow. In fact, since 1970, air pollution has decreased by nearly 70 percent while the economy has tripled in size. The Clean Power Plan builds on this progress, while providing states the flexibility and tools to transition to clean, reliable, and affordable electricity.

BUILDING ON PROGRESS

The Clean Power Plan builds on steps taken by the Administration, states, cities, and companies to move to cleaner sources of energy.Solar electricity generation has increased more than 20-fold since 2008, and electricity from wind has more than tripled.  Efforts such as the following give us a strong head start in meeting the Clean Power Plan’s goals:

  • 50 states with demand-side energy efficiency programs
  • 37 states with renewable portfolio standards or goals
  • 10 states with market-based greenhouse gas reduction programs
  • 25 states with energy efficiency standards or goals

Today’s actions also build on a series of actions the Administration is taking through the President’s Climate Action Plan to reduce the dangerous levels of carbon pollution that are contributing to climate change, including:

  • Standards for Light and Heavy-Duty Vehicles: Earlier this summer, the EPA and the Department of Transportation proposed the second phase of fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, which if finalized as proposed will reduce 1 billion tons of carbon pollution. The proposed standards build on the first phase of heavy-duty vehicle requirements and standards for light-duty vehicles issued during the President’s first term that will save Americans $1.7 trillion, reduce oil consumption by 2.2 million barrels per day by 2025, and slash greenhouse gas emissions by 6 billion metric tons through the lifetime of the program.
  • Low Income Solar: Last month, the White House announced a new initiative to increase access to solar energy for all Americans, in particular low-and moderate income communities, and build a more inclusive workforce. The initiative will help families and businesses cut their energy bills through launching a National Community Solar Partnership to unlock access to solar for the nearly 50 percent of households and business that are renters or do not have adequate roof space to install solar systems and sets a goal to install 300 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy in federally subsidized housing by 2020. Through this initiative housing authorities, rural electric co-ops, power companies, and organizations in more than 20 states across the country committed to put in place more than 260 solar energy projects and philanthropic and impact investors, states, and cities are committed to invest $520 million to advance community solar and scale up solar and energy efficiency for low- and moderate- income households. The initiative also includes AmeriCorps funding to deploy solar and create jobs in underserved communities and a commitment from the solar industry to become the most diverse sector of the U.S. energy industry.
  • Economy-Wide Measures to Reduce other Greenhouse Gases: EPA and other agencies are taking actions to cut methane emissions from oil and gas systems, landfills, coal mining, and agriculture through cost-effective voluntary actions and common-sense standards. At the same time, the U.S. Department of State is working to slash global emissions of potent industrial greenhouse gases, called hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), through an amendment to the Montreal Protocol; EPA is cutting domestic HFC emissions through its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program; and, the private sector has stepped up with commitments to cut global HFC emissions equivalent to 700 million metric tons of carbon pollution through 2025.
  • Investing in Coal Communities, Workers, and Communities:  In February, as part of the President’s FY 2016 budget, the Administration released the POWER+ Plan to invest in workers and jobs, address important legacy costs in coal country, and drive the development of coal technology. The Plan provides dedicated new resources for economic diversification, job creation, job training, and other employment services for workers and communities impacted by layoffs at coal mines and coal-fired power plants; includes unprecedented investments in the health and retirement security of mineworkers and their families and the accelerated clean-up of hazardous coal abandoned mine lands; and provides new tax incentives to support continued technology development and deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration technologies.
  • Energy Efficiency Standards: DOE set a goal of reducing carbon pollution by 3 billion metric tons cumulatively by 2030 through energy conservation standards issued during this Administration. DOE has already finalized energy conservation standards for 29 categories of appliances and equipment, as well as a building code determination for commercial buildings. These measures will also cut consumers' annual electricity bills by billions of dollars.
  • Investing in Clean Energy:In June the White House announced more than $4 billion in private-sector commitments and executive actions to scale up investment in clean energy innovation, including launching a new Clean Energy Impact Investment Center at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to make information about energy and climate programs at DOE and other government agencies accessible and more understandable to the public, including to mission-driven investors.

###

Solar power sparks resistance from Ohio utilities including FirstEnergy and AEP

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 31, 2015  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments

 Solarize Cleveland

Home solar panels going up across Ohio and the nation like this one are beginning to disturb electric utility executives who must absorb and pay for the extra power these systems generate. Utilities are fighting back, trying to limit how much power they must buy.
 

Solar power sparks resistance from Ohio utilities

By John Funk, The Plain Dealer
Follow on Twitter
on July 29, 2015 at 10:15 AM, updated July 29, 2015 at 2:46 PM

CLEVELAND -- There are nearly 1,600 solar arrays now generating power in Ohio, and the state's two biggest utilities think that is a problem.

FirstEnergy and Columbus-based American Electric Power have already taken the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio to the Ohio Supreme Court over how much they must pay solar owners for excess power and how much excess power they are required to buy.

The court has not ruled on either case, however the commission is now considering further revisions to its January 2014 ruling.

That has drawn the attention of the solar industry as well as environmental groups that see the utilities standing in the way of a new technology because it threatens their bottom lines.

For consumers and businesses thinking about buying solar, the issue is critical to their ability to pay for a solar array, even at today's lower prices.

The issue is called net metering. The PUCO has been trying to figure out an equitable policy for three years.

Net metering is what allows solar owners to hook into the local utility grid and sell any excess power they generate back to the local power company.

There are three major issues for the utilities: How much power the companies must buy from the solar owners, at what rate they have to pay for it, and what customers can even ask to be reimbursed.

In a January 2014 decision, the  commission limited the "excess" electricity a customer can ship back into a power company's local grid to 120 percent of that customer's average monthly demand over the previous three years.

Utilities argued that anything above 100 percent was unfair. They took the case to the high court, which has yet to rule on the matter because the commission has indicated it is reviewing its original decision.

The utilities want the commission to limit the amount of power they have to buy from owners of solar systems to the average amount of power the customers bought from the utilities in the three years before they began generating power with solar panels.

Also, the companies don't want to reimburse customers at the same rate the utility charges, now about 6 cents per kilowatt-hour, because that rate includes two parts. The largest portion is the cost of the energy itself; the remainder, usually about 6-to-10 percent of the total price, is called a capacity charge and reflects the cost to keep power plants operating.

The utilities want to pay solar owners just the energy price.

And they don't want to reimburse a customer with solar who also happens to be buying power from another company and having it delivered through the local utility.  They argue that there are no arrangements for the local utility to in turn be reimbursed by the out-of-town power supplier.

The companies don't immediately write a monthly check to solar system owners  but do have to credit these consumers on their the next month's bills. That can reduce or even eliminate the customer's debt to the utilities in the following months.

If a solar system generates more power annually than the solar owner's average consumption over the preceding three years, the company is required to issue a refund check.

"The approach proposed by AEP and FirstEnergy falsely presumes solar has no value,"

The companies also argue that customers with solar systems are not paying their "fair share" to maintain the power lines that bring electricity to their neighborhoods.

That's because delivery charges -- which pay for construction and upkeep of the delivery system - are based on how much electricity a customer buys monthly from the utility.  Customers that are able to lower their net purchases aren't paying as much as customers who must buy all of their power from the utility.

From that perspective, the cost of the delivery system is pushed onto the backs of those customers who cannot afford solar.

"AEP Ohio supports," said spokeswoman Terri Flora, "but we need to make sure regulatory policies allow for recovery of grid costs without transferring the burden unfairly to non-solar customers."

FirstEnergy, which has been at odds with AEP over many issues, is a comrade in arms on this one.

"FirstEnergy is not opposed to the concept of net metering," said Jennifer Young, spokeswoman. "We support rules that ensure net metering is implemented in a way that fairly compensates customers and utilities for their participation."

But so far, the PUCO has not come up with a new way, and the case has drawn the attention of the solar industry, which sees the fight in Ohio as typical push-back.

"Certainly there is a national play book to eliminate rooftop solar," said Amy Heart, speaking for the Alliance for Solar Choice, an industry trade group.

She said utilities are trying to upend net metering policies in more than 40 states, some of which have been on the books for three decades.

"The challenges have come through legislation and in rate cases," she said, but predicted that solar will eventually win because it has broad political, economic and environmental support. And the price of quickly evolving solar technology is dropping.

In testimony she gave to the PUCO in May, Heart said cost-benefit analyses of solar's value in other states consistently shows that it helps utilities reduce the need to build more power plants or transmission lines and even decreases electric rates.

One attorney for a national environmental policy group involved in the case says the issue is how to determine the true value of solar to society.

"it's vital that the PUCO ensure that solar customers are fairly compensated for the value they provide," said Madeline Fleisher an attorney for the Environmental Law & Policy Center in Columbus.

"On hot summer days like we're expecting Tuesday, both demand for power and the productivity of solar panels go up," she said.

"The approach proposed by AEP and FirstEnergy falsely presumes solar has no value in replacing generation from other, often dirtier, power sources on such peak demand days. If the PUCO adopts this perspective, solar projects that would provide a net benefit to all Ohioans won't be built here, they'll be built in states that value solar."

This story was edited by the author to correct the error that the Ohio Supreme Court ordered the PUCO to reconsider its January 2014  ruling after AEP and FirstEnergy appealed the ruling to the court. The court stayed activity in the case after the commission indicated it would consider furthering revisions to its ruling. 

Wyldon King Fishman: Community Solar Passes the NY Public Service Commission

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 31, 2015  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Wyldon King Fishman

Wyldon King Fishman is the Founder and President of the New York Solar Energy Society.
 
 

Community Solar Passes the NY Public Service Commission

July 17, 2015
By Wyldon King Fishman

If you live or work in a shady location, summertime temperatures can be a little cooler around your home or business. Shade is a wonderful thing and it’s smart to have shade even if it’s only an awning. But, you may have figured out you can’t have solar modules without sun. Welcome to Community Solar!

Low-income renters, multifamily buildings, schools, municipal governments, residential and commercial customers can now band together and finance a solar system located nearby in a field or on a big, sunny warehouse rooftop. How to? First, find 10 or more “families” or businesses and a leader who will be the point person/supervisor of the whole project. Everyone needs to be located fairly close to one another. Everyone shares a piece of the system pie. Every month every member’s utility bill reflects the “net metering credit” of your portion of the system. Not keen to handle the job? Contact solar installation consultants and contractors. Listening to the professionals will help your group understand the ins and outs of financing, locations, and utility hook ups for access to transmission lines. They’ll educate you and then turn around and come out and bid on your project. You’ll have decisions to make about land acquisition, site surveys, engineering studies and fees to pay for permits. (And, later, “cut over” party to plan!)

A solar electricity generation system needs full sun to produce lots of electricity. If the system is shaded even a little bit, the rebates are unattainable. If you have a sunny spot away from your building, you can use it. If not, why not join together with others and buy a Shared Renewable Energy System?

Local solar, wind and “other” renewable energy projects qualify. Perhaps heat and cooling from geothermal ground sources and concentrating solar thermal will be included.

Details

First Phase October 19, 2015: 1. Limited to benefitting low-income customers with high demand for power not easily met by the current utility grid. 2. Supporting economically distressed communities by ensuring at least 20% of the participants are low and moderate income customers.

Second Phase May 1, 2016: All can participate in all utility territories.

Colorado was the first state to allow what was then called Solar Gardens. They were limited by caps. Overnight they caps were filled to capacity. The utilities complained about transmission line usage. Over time some utilities began to see the advantage of Solar Gardens where the electric load was very high and the service was not dependable. The New York Solar Energy Society got a call from the staff in the Budget and Taxation Department asking why this wasn’t happening in NY. Our response had a lot to do with getting a farm or a camp with utility service from different utilities. The barn over on the other side of the road got electricity from a pole nearby that was not serviced by the same utility the house was. A camp had a sunny field next to the pole from a utility that didn’t service the main kitchen. Different utilities didn’t have to cooperate, share transmission lines and take care of the extra billing. Now we shall see if progress has been made. The details have not been finalized.

After six years of working with the energy committees of the legislature we never got the bill we needed. Over the past year Governor Andrew Cuomo pushed through the Shared Renewable Initiative or Community Net Metering as part of his Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) Initiative. This is a surprise win-win for all New Yorkers seeking clean, affordable energy. Local Energy production can withstand storms better with shorter transmission lines. Long distance transmission lines lose 8 – 18% of the electricity generated at the power plant! With power generation nearby every electron can be used. Eliminate the cost of extraction and transportation and expensive transmission line and benefit from lower costs and healthy clean air and water.

Equal access to renewable energy has come to New York. NYState’s Public Service Commission voted and has issued a final order telling the utilities the time has come to allow any group to buy a solar energy generation system, hook it up to the grid and credit the members of the group every month. The future is bright for locals to design and implement a grid for your community. Along with the Community Solar announcement came more than 80 microgrid research grants winners. Your community solar farm can be joined by wind and combined with battery backup for uninterruptable power supply. Stay tuned and prepare now to find a group interested in free fuel from the sun and wind powering your community.

More information? http://www.ny-sun.ny.gov/community-solar

IndianaDG Editor's Note:  Wanna read the actual NY PSC Order? Download it HERE.

 NYPSC Community DG Program Order_{76520435-25ED-4B84-8477-6433CE88DA86}

Also see next post for more information.

 

Utility Dive: ConEd will enter NY rooftop solar market through unregulated subsidiary

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   July 30, 2015  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

ConEd will enter NY rooftop solar market through unregulated subsidiary

 By | July 30, 2015

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG