Author Archives Laura Arnold

Solar farm fuels interest in bigger Ky projects; KY vs. IN solar policies

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 18, 2016  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Solar farm fuels interest in bigger Ky projects

Mark Mahan, Special to The CJ
A group from Solar Over Louisville toured the Berea community solar array on March 23, 2016, in Berea, Ky. less

, @jbruggers10:18 a.m. EDT April 18, 2016

BEREA, Ky. – The 4-year-old solar farm here isn't modest. It's tiny. Just 246 panels. Enough to power six or seven homes.

But it was the first in Kentucky of what insiders call "community shared solar" – solar-electric systems that provide power or financial benefits to their members or participants. They're especially useful to people who cannot or do not want to put solar panels on their roofs but still want to offset their energy use with clean power from the sun.

More than 150 people have leased the solar panels in Berea. They paid a one-time leasing fee of $750 at an array built and run by Berea Municipal Utilities. In turn, the customers get a few bucks off their electricity bills each month for 25 years. Their return on investment will take two decades. But that wasn't really the point.

"People were interested in doing something toward an energy transformation in Kentucky," recalled retired Berea College mathematics professor Steve Boyce, a driving force behind the project. Participation was, he said, "out of an urge to be able to do something when we were not getting any leadership on sustainability nationally nor in Kentucky."

Kentucky still ranks near the bottom of all states – 45th out of 50 – for all renewable energy production, at 2.4 percent, and solar is barely noticeable at less than 1 percent of all electricity consumed, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Indiana ranks much better for renewable energy production – 29th – but most of that is from biomass energy including ethanol production.

Cheap electricity rates from burning coal and now even cheaper natural gas – and state energy policy – still make it hard in states like Kentucky and Indiana for solar to compete on the bottom line. But that seems to be changing as the cost of solar falls and is expected to decline up to 12 percent per year through 2020, according to the Energy Department.

Despite its small size, the Berea example is stirring the imagination of the organizers of the new Solar Over Louisville push backed by Mayor Greg Fischer. It calls for 2 megawatts of solar capacity to be installed in Louisville this year. Community solar is one option those organizers are examining.

"It opens the doorway to what we could have," said Nancy Givens, a Solar Over Louisville volunteer, on a tour of the Berea facility in March. "We're looking at how we can take baby steps. We still don't have policies in place, but we have a lot of interest."

Indiana touts its sunshine, and Indianapolis was recently ranked second in the nation for solar panel capacity per capita behind Honolulu in the Environment America 2016 Shining Cities report. By contrast, Louisville was dubbed a "solar beginner."

Kentucky's 2008 energy plan found that the Bluegrass state has ample amounts of sun for solar power.

Joshua Bills, energy expert with the Mountain Association for Community Economic Development, pointed to the solar inverters during a tour of the Berea community solar array on March 23, 2016, in Berea, Ky. (Photo: Mark Mahan, Special to The CJ)

"People think we don't have enough sun, but we do," said Joshua Bills, an energy expert with the Mountain Association for Community Economic Development in Berea.

In states long dominated by coal, even utilities are starting to notice the sun.

Utilities explore solar

As grassroots solar power advocates press for state legislation to loosen utilities' grip on energy production and encourage more solar power including community solar farms, two big Kentucky Public Service Commission-regulated utilities are planning ways to join Berea and offer community solar options for their customers.

They are part of a national trend, according to a recent report by the Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions. Deloitte found that there was one such solar project in 2010 in the United States.

Now, 77 utilities administer 11 projects in 26 states, offering a combined capacity of 106 megawatts, the study found.

"Utilities are finding that shared solar allows them to grow their solar generation portfolios, developers are seizing the opportunity to expand their business offerings, and more customers have the chance to buy solar power," the study says. "By unlocking value in each segment of the supply chain, community solar is evolving into a growth engine for distributed solar resources."

East Kentucky Power Cooperative has 16 member-owned distribution co-ops with 527,000 customers in 87 counties. It plans to take a proposal for community solar to the PSC this spring. The idea is to construct an 8.5-megawatt solar farm on 60 acres near its headquarters in Winchester, then license solar panels to the cooperatives' members, who would then get credit on their bills for energy produced by the sun.

Important details such as how much the licenses would cost and how participation would affect members' bills are still being worked out, said Nick Comer, East Kentucky Power spokesman.

Mark Mahan, Special to The CJ

A group from Solar Over Louisville toured the Berea community solar array on March 23, 2016 in Berea, Ky.

The solar farm would generate enough electricity to power about 1,000 homes, he said.

"We have members who are interested in doing this," Comer added.

Louisville-based LG&E and KU Energy officials said their customers have asked for something similar, so they are developing their own community solar vision. They believe customers are ready to help them invest in that vision.

Those solar panels could be "on the lot next door or 50 miles away," or located on buildings or in parking lots, said John Malloy, vice president of customer service for LG&E and KU Energy.

In a program they also hope to get through the PCS this year, customers would pay a sign-up fee and subscription fees to help cover costs for the construction and operation of what they also call community solar.

LG&E's David Huff, director of customer energy efficiency, said participants would then get a pro-rated share of the electricity produced, similar to net-metering arrangements for customers who install their own solar panels on their homes or businesses.

Net metering credits customers owning solar panels with the electricity they add to the grid.

It's doubtful that the arrangement would result in smaller electricity bills at today's energy pricing, Huff said. Solar is still more expensive than coal or natural gas, LG&E officials said. But customers could find their investment a hedge against future rate increases, Huff added.

It's not community solar, but LG&E and KU Energy is preparing to dedicate its first solar array on April 19, just in time for Earth Day on April 22.

Crews have been erecting 45,000 solar panels on 50 acres in Mercer County adjacent to the company's E.W. Brown power plant. Those 10 megawatts should generate enough electricity for about 1,750 homes.

"It was put in at that size so we can get better experiences how solar is going to work in our company," said Scott Straight, LG&E and KU Energy's director of project engineering. He said it's expected to cost about 10 percent less than the budgeted $35 million, in part because the cost of solar panels fell rapidly during the project.

Electricity generated from that array will flow into the grid, just as at any other of the company's power plants.

LG&E and KU Energy is also this year developing a new program for large-scale industrial or commercial businesses that want to tap the sun while ensuring those costs won't be subsidized by other customers, Malloy said.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission last year approved Duke Energy’s 20-year agreements with two solar developers to purchase up to 20 megawatts of solar power for its Indiana customers. In January, Duke also proposed to construct a 17-megawatt solar facility at Naval Support Activity Crane, a Naval installation southwest of Bloomington.

Community solar obstacles

Indiana has a handful of utility-run community solar projects largely run by electric cooperatives, but the concept has not taken off because of legislative obstacles in Indiana similar to those in Kentucky, said solar advocate Laura Arnold, president of the Indiana Distributed Energy Alliance.

When she and other solar advocates discuss community solar, they describe an entirely different model from one put forward by LG&E and East Kentucky Power, where the utility is at the center.

They see regulated utilities' efforts to create more community-based solar projects as an alternative to supporting better, more open net metering policies and to keep control, Arnold said. That utilities have adopted the community solar name for their efforts even bothers some, said Bills.

Arnold said that different vision places a neighborhood at the center. Residents, businesses and churches come together to establish their own solar installation. And using net metering, the electricity it generates offsets each participant's bills.

But neither Indiana nor Kentucky allows what's called virtual or remote net metering, where customers share benefits of electricity output from a single solar power project.

And to really encourage community solar, Kentucky lawmakers would also need to raise the individual system size cap to require net metering above 30 kilowatt systems, so more than only a few efficient homes could be on one system, Bills added.

Indiana's net metering limit is larger, set at 1 MW systems.

Nationally, there's been tension between solar advocates and utilities, with utilities fighting to make sure all their fixed administration and power line maintenance costs are shared among all their customers, as many customers seek to lower their bills by generating solar power. That played out in a rate increase dispute last year with LG&E and KU.

Berea Municipal Utilities has more freedom because, as a city-owned utility, it doesn't fall under the regulation of the PSC. But it also has limits on its solar generation because of terms of its contract with Kentucky Utilities, said Ed Fortner Jr., the city's utilities director.

Still, he said, the small array has "got a lot of publicity. But this is the future – renewables, along with energy efficiency."

Reach reporter James Bruggers at (502) 582-4645 and at jbruggers@courier-journal.com.

Duke Energy Seeks $120,000 Sanction against Critics in NC Church-Solar Test Case

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 16, 2016  /   Posted in solar  /   No Comments

Duke Energy Seeks $120,000 Sanction against Critics in Church-Solar Test Case

As legal battle begins over nonprofit’s solar sales to church partner, national solar companies, NC industry and faith groups join case over monopoly control of rooftops

As a legal battle begins over whether only Duke Energy can sell electricity in its captive territories, the nation’s largest electric corporation is calling for massive financial punishment of its long-time critic, nonprofit NC WARN, for selling solar power to a community church in Greensboro.

Duke Energy told the NC Utilities Commission in a Friday filing that the regulators should penalize NC WARN up to $1,000 for every day since late June, when the group began selling solar power to Faith Community Church after contracting to have a 5.2 kilowatt photovoltaic system installed on its roof.

Duke Energy is clearly trying to punish and silence one of its most persistent critics.  After joining the Koch brothers in beating down bipartisan legislation that would have allowed solar competition – and which had broad public, business and military support – this attempt to sanction NC WARN shows how intensely Duke will fight to disallow third-party financing for solar power.

Duke’s position is particularly egregious because NC WARN and Rev. Nelson Johnson very publicly announced the unprecedented solar installation as a test case to clarify state policy, and it was accompanied by an NC WARN legal request for a declaratory ruling by the NC Utilities Commission.

We have cited precedents from in-state cases and those in other states, and maintain that the funding arrangement is consistent with state energy policy and with the constitutional ban of monopolies, and that it should be encouraged across North Carolina.  Since that time, numerous other churches have expressed interest in solar power via third party – or “no money down” – solar financing in order to save money and further their Earth stewardship.

Duke Energy is entitled to disagree with us, but seeking to financially hammer this 27 year-old nonprofit is more proof that Goliath wants neither competition, criticism, nor scrutiny.

This case has been joined by the nation’s largest solar company, SolarCity and others interested in offering “no money down” installation of solar on churches, businesses, homes and other customers.  Nonprofit NC Interfaith Power & Light is also an intervener, represented by Southern Environmental Law Center, and supports our position.

North Carolina is one of only four states where third party sales are thought to be disallowed – three of them are Duke states.  Georgia recently joined the rest of the country where either regulators or courts have allowed solar companies to sell power directly to customers from systems on those customers’ property. Until now, no one has tested it in North Carolina.

How can Duke possibly justify a $120,000 penalty based on losing a few hundred bucks in sales to the Faith Community Church?

NC WARN has been openly and persistently critical of Duke Energy’ executives’ climate-wrecking, customer-gouging practices over many years.  That includes its “build plants, raise rates, control government” business model, its coal ash injustices, its distortions about carbon emissions and solar power, and its Koch collaboration to limit solar.  Most recently, we have petitioned Attorney General Cooper to alter Duke’s corporate charter, and are challenging Duke’s incredible stumbling toward a fracking gas future despite its disastrous methane emissions and high-risk financial future.

All these efforts continue to the present day, and it seems clear that Duke is now retaliating, seeking to cast a chilling effect over NC WARN and other critics.  Our long-running criticisms have remained truthful and factual, and directed not toward the many Duke’s workers who do their jobs well.  Our complaints are with the executives who make so many decisions that are incompatible with the physical and economic well-being of the people of North Carolina.

NC WARN will continue seeking to foster honest public debate about Duke Energy’s practices and the need to join the clean energy revolution.  We have offered to the executives many times – and hereby repeat again – that we to would like very much to find ways to stop fighting Duke, and to work together to address the planetary emergency posed by climate change.

As Rev. Johnson stated at the ribbon cutting ceremony in June:  “The time is right for the People of North Carolina to come together around our common goals of stewardship, pollution, and the protection of low-income customers against the rising power bills they face under Duke Energy’s current plans.”

Third party solar could be helping all electricity customers avoid rate hikes for more power plants – if companies offering third party sales are allowed to compete in this state.

Ohio Bill continuing ‘freeze’ on clean energy expected soon

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 14, 2016  /   Posted in solar, wind  /   No Comments

Bill continuing 'freeze' on clean energy expected soon

By Dan GearinoThe Columbus Dispatch  •  Wednesday April 13, 2016 5:06 PM

Legislative Republicans are close to proposing an extension of a freeze on state standards for energy efficiency and renewable energy, an idea that Gov. John Kasich has said he opposes.

Sen. Bill Seitz, R-Cincinnati, has been circulating a draft of a three-year extension of the freeze and could introduce it as a bill as soon as next week, according to lawmakers and lobbyists who are closely following it. The bill would seek to implement some of the recommendations of the Energy Mandates Study Committee, a joint House-Senate panel that issued a final report in September.

Seitz, a key player in passing the original freeze in 2014, was not available for comment on Wednesday.

Senate President Keith Faber, R-Celina, said he is generally supportive of extending the freeze, particularly while waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on the Obama administration's proposed regulations on carbon emissions.

The Sierra Club has reviewed the draft of the bill and says it is "unacceptable."

"Other members of our legislature should not be aligning with this misguided piece of legislation, and it's time for Gov. Kasich to take leadership in developing a reasonable clean-energy standard for our state," said Samantha Allen, conservation program director for the environmental group.

Other groups also are gearing up for a fight.

"The legislature has a clear choice," said Ted Ford, president and CEO of Ohio Advanced Energy Economy. "It can create a business-friendly environment to attract investment in advanced energy or Ohio can keep the door shut on billions of dollars of benefits."

Meanwhile, Sen. Troy Balderson, R-Zanesville, co-chairman of the study committee, says the panel's recommendations should be debated.

"It's something that needs to be done," he said.

The two-year freeze took effect in 2014 and is about to conclude. It covers state rules that require utilities to meet annual benchmarks for investment in energy efficiency and renewable energy.

The freeze was a compromise, as some majority Republicans lawmakers wanted to repeal the rules, arguing that the costs of compliance are greater than the benefits. Opponents said the rules are good for the environment and the economy.

At the time of the study committee report, Kasich's office said the governor opposes an extension freeze, and Kasich has repeated that view while campaigning for president. Kasich spokesman Joe Andrews had no comment on Wednesday.

dgearino@dispatch.com

@dangearino

 

Clifton (Louisville, KY) solar panels OK’d, with conditions

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 14, 2016  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Clifton solar panels OK'd, with conditions

A solar panel case in Clifton that attracted heated attention was largely resolved Wednesday  when a city architectural review committee approved the installation of the panels after-the-fact.

Clifton is a local preservation district, and homeowner Mark Frazar had been cited by the city for installing the panels in December 2014 without applying for a certificate of appropriateness that's required.

He must still obtain a building permit for the installation and was asked to fill in a gap by the chimney where the red roof showed through. Frazar, who works as a project manager for a local architectural office, said he didn't realize he needed approval for the panels.

Many people spoke in support of Frazar at an evening meeting of the Metro Landmarks and Preservation Districts Commission's Clifton Architectural Review Committee, which voted to issue the certificate -- meaning Frazar didn't have to remove or move the panels. Frazar said he was satisfied with the outcome and hoped it would "help people work together" more.

The audience applauded when neighborhood leader Mike O'Leary urged approval.

Committee leader Jay Stottman said it was not a choice between preservation or solar installation but about the importance of finding solutions through the review process.  After-the-fact reviews risk "putting the whole process in jeopardy," he said.

Frazar had said the panels needed to have southeast exposure to work, and Develop Louisville head Jim Mims said the panels were "not offensive, not in-your-face."

David Coyte, a Clifton Community Council leader, praised Frazar for his energy conservation efforts.

"That's they way we need to go," said David Doll, a facilities manager at St. James Church in Tyler Park, which is considering solar panels for its school.

But Phil Samuels, who worked on the 62-page list of guidelines for the district, said people needed to take more responsibility for being aware of the guidelines.

"He should have known," Samuels said. Frazer received staff approval for a new roof he also had put on, and a $100 fine he was issued was waived after he applied last fall for the certificate.

Reporter Martha Elson can be reached at 502-582-7061 and melson@courier-journal.com.  Follow her on Twitter at @MarthaElson_cj.

Comment

Steve Riggs Representative

This article on the "solar panel civil war" in Clifton is very informative. On Day #1 I contacted the Mayor to plead for reasonable intervention on behalf of those who want solar panels. City bureaucrats shouldn't issue fines in cases like this. It's up to them to properly advise citizens about this overreaching review process and its existence. A normal citizen can't be expected to be expert in something so shadowy as this. City leaders want more solar panels and the old-time bureaucrats need to re-focus their efforts to be more modern and flexible with our energy policies.

Lt. Gov. Holcomb Hosts Media Event on Crane Naval-Duke Energy Solar Project

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   April 13, 2016  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

FullSizeRender

Pictured above from left to right: CDR Timothy Craddock, Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity Crane; the Honorable Dennis V. McGinn, assistant secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations & Environment; Indiana Lt. Governor Eric Holcomb; Melody Birmingham-Byrd, President, Duke Energy Indiana; and Duane Embree, director of the Indiana Office of Defense Development.

FullSizeRender_4

state seal

OFFICE OF THE LT. GOVERNOR
STATE HOUSE
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204-2797

Eric J. Holcomb

LT. GOVERNOR

For Immediate Release  

April 13, 2016

The Department of the Navy and Indiana Lieutenant Governor Host Press Event about Energy Security Initiatives

WASHINGTON (NNS) – Today at the Indiana State Capitol, the Department of the Navy (DON), the office of the Indiana Lieutenant Governor and Duke Energy hosted a press event regarding energy security and resiliency initiatives in Indiana.

This event follows the recent announcement that the DON and Duke Energy are collaborating to develop a 24-megawatt (MW) direct current (17-MW alternating current) solar facility at Naval Support Activity (NSA) Crane. Projected to be one of Indiana’s largest solar facilities, the project is awaiting approval from the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to begin construction.

The press event featured remarks by the Honorable Dennis V. McGinn, assistant secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations & Environment; Eric Holcomb, lieutenant governor of Indiana; Melody Birmingham-Byrd, president of Duke Energy Indiana; and Duane Embree, director of the Indiana Office of Defense Development.

Senior leaders remarked on progress and potential for more public private partnerships as new energy technologies, regulations and tax credit extensions enable agencies to meet critical federal and defense energy and security goals, while also furthering Duke Energy and the state’s commitment to energy resiliency in Indiana.

McGinn emphasized the importance of this project, “We greatly value our partnership with Indiana and with Duke Energy. It is collaborative and mutually beneficial efforts like this that helped the Department of the Navy surpass the Secretary of the Navy’s goal to procure one gigawatt of renewable energy by the end of 2015. On-base projects provide energy security for the host and surrounding communities by physically securing assets, diversifying the local power portfolio and boosting the base’s resiliency with the in-kind consideration received for use of Navy land.”

"We are honored to welcome Secretary McGinn to Indiana as we express our support for the Duke Energy solar installation at Crane,” said Holcomb. “Indiana is home to a number of critical defense assets, and we are proud of the amazing work being done at Crane to support American warfighters with the most advanced equipment in the world. We will continue to build upon our strong partnerships with these important military installations well into the future.”

“Pending regulatory approval, the planned solar installation at Naval Support Activity Crane will be the first large utility-scale solar generating facility on Duke Energy Indiana’s system. It’s a key milestone that advances us toward the goal of operating our company in a sustainable way,” said Birmingham-Byrd.

#


Media Contact:
Dennis Rosebrough
Communications Director
Office of Lt. Governor Eric Holcomb
drosebrough@lg.in.gov
desk: (317) 234-4258


The Lieutenant Governor statutorily serves as the President of the Indiana Senate and chairs the Indiana Counter Terrorism and Security Council. Additionally, he manages the following agencies of State government:

FoB2016

FullSizeRender_3

Lt. Governor Eric Holcomb

FullSizeRender_1

Honorable Dennis V. McGinn, assistant secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations & Environment

FullSizeRender_2

Remarks by Melody Birmingham-Byrd, President, Duke Energy Indiana (photo above)

Crane solar project media availability on April 13, 2016, Indiana Statehouse

The electric utility industry of today and tomorrow is looking less and less like the one most of us grew up with. Change is clearly in the air.

Specifically, I’m referring to the growing trend of generating more of our electric energy from renewable resources, such as wind power, hydropower, and solar power. As I will explain in just a moment, Duke Energy has long been an industry leader in reducing emissions from power plants that run on fossil fuels, while developing and deploying the latest technology that makes renewable energy less expensive to build and operate.

Many of us have heard the saying, “If you’re not at the table, you’ll be on the menu,” which means, in this case, that we can either ignore that trend and keep doing business the way we always have, or we can be an active and engaged participant, even a leader, in shaping the future of electric energy in ways that benefit our customers and our communities.

Fortunately, Duke Energy has chosen the latter.

Solar energy is not new to Duke Energy here in Indiana. Last year, we signed agreements to purchase up to 20 megawatts of solar power from companies who built solar generating facilities in four Hoosier communities.

We announced on Jan. 7 that, pending regulatory approval, we intend to build, own and operate a 17-megawatt solar energy site at Naval Support Activity Crane, located in Martin County about 40 miles south of Bloomington. If regulators give us the green light, we expect that clean, renewable solar power from this site will flow onto the grid by the end of this year.

We are pleased to partner with the Department of the Navy on this project. In North Carolina, Duke Energy has already joined with the Navy to build a 13-megawatt solar facility at the U.S. Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune, near Jacksonville. Our company will continue to explore other opportunities to partner with customers, including the U.S. military, to install additional sources of renewable energy.

As I’m sure you realize, energy from renewable resources is limited because it is intermittent. If the wind doesn’t blow, or the sun doesn’t shine, no electricity is generated. A great deal of research is now underway to improve how we might store large amounts of energy for use at a later time. Toward that end, Duke Energy has granted $1 million to the Battery Innovation Center, also located near the Crane naval base, to advance energy storage research, particularly as it applies to homes, schools and communities.

Pending regulatory approval, the planned solar installation at Naval Support Activity Crane will be the first large utility-scale solar generating facility on Duke Energy Indiana’s system. It’s a key milestone that advances us toward the goal of operating our company in an increasingly sustainable way.

Duke Energy has made a huge commitment to sustainability in all of our operations. We define sustainability as operating our company in ways that are good for people, good for the planet, and good for profits. Sustainability incorporates safety for our employees and our customers, actively finding ways to reduce waste in our offices and at our power plants, and serving our customers in ways that meet, and even exceed, their expectations.

Make no mistake – coal-fired and natural-gas fired plants will be with us for many more years. Those plants provide the power we all need 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, keeping Indiana homes and industries operating, especially during times of high power demand when it’s very hot or cold.

At the same time, the trend toward renewable energy, which now is so prominent, will only grow. Because of our experience with renewables, Duke Energy is well-positioned and better suited to build and integrate renewable energy sources into our grid. As the largest electric utility in Indiana and in the nation, we are preparing for the future. Since 2007, our company has spent over $3 billion to grow our portfolio of wind and solar power projects nationwide. As a company, about 10 percent of our overall generation capacity is from renewable resources, and we plan to add even more renewables to our portfolio.

To sum up, this solar power project, in partnership with the Department of the Navy, will move us even further down the road toward the goal of providing reliable, affordable and increasingly clean electric energy to our customers.


For more information on this proposed project currently pending approval by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC), see http://www.indianadg.net/44734-duke-energy-indiana-crane-solar-facility/

An evidentiary hearing before the IURC is scheduled for May 10, 2016. Watch for more details.


 

 

 

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG