Author Archives Laura Arnold

Advocates: Language in Ohio bill SB 320 (2016) would ‘basically shut down’ solar

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 23, 2016  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Crews work on a solar farm near Minster, Ohio.

Crews work on a solar farm near Minster, Ohio.

Advocates: Language in Ohio bill would ‘basically shut down’ solar

A bill to extend the “freeze” of Ohio's renewable energy and efficiency standards also contains provisions that would undermine solar growth in the state, advocates say.

SB 320, which was introduced last month, “is unprecedented as far as what it's proposing,” said Amy Heart, senior manager of public policy for Sunrun, a residential solar installer.

Specifically, the bill would undermine net metering and allow utilities to enter the rooftop solar business – essentially competing with private companies that must operate under a different set of rules.

The bill, Heart says, would “basically shut down the competitive solar market so it would freeze the industry in its tracks and give the utilities a blank slate to do what they want without oversight by the (Public Utilities Commission of Ohio).”

The bill would also redefine “renewable” energy to include power generated by nuclear plants and even some fossil fuel technologies.

Sen. Bill Seitz, who introduced the bill, could not be reached for comment.

'It's devastating'

There is almost no chance of the bill passing before the Ohio Legislature adjourns in late May. However, it is almost certain to be taken up during the legislature's lame duck session, which will begin in November.

While solar installers now working in Ohio must comply with a raft of commission regulations, it appears that the bill would invite utilities to begin selling solar systems without having to comply with state rules.

Heart said the 100-page bill's sprawling, obscure language required the help of attorneys and regulatory experts to clarify  “what its impact would be on the industry. And it's devastating.”

Trish Demeter, managing director of energy programs for the Ohio Environmental Council, said the bill “would allow a utility to own a behind-the-meter project. If I'm a homeowner and want to do rooftop solar, the distribution utility that would have a vested interest in not seeing solar move forward would be the owner of that project. It seems like an anti-competitive clause.”

The bill also would give utilities “a tremendous amount of power” in negotiating contracts with solar customers, Demeter said. The utility would have the upper hand in determining, for example, how much excess power it would purchase and at what price, and the terms under which it would connect with a customer's solar panels.

“As a customer, how do I know what to negotiate in my contract if the PUC has no minimum standards?” Demeter said. “I just have to trust what that utility tells me? Maybe what they're telling me is an advantage to them and a disadvantage to me.”

Demeter said the bill also would redefine “renewable” to include nuclear power and various “combustion-based technologies.”

“It blows up what 'renewable' means to make it meaningless,” she said. “And the same thing with energy efficiency. It makes it that much easier for utilities to meet their annual targets.”

Net metering changes

The bill also would change net metering rules in a way that would make distributed generation much less attractive. Utilities now calculate energy use and production by net metering customers each month. They can carry over excess power as credits indefinitely.

SB 320 would require an accounting every hour. Excess power would revert to the utility at the end of every hour.

That change in policy, Heart said, “would devalue the solar power being generated. This doesn't exist anywhere in the country. It doesn't fairly account for the solar production on a home.”

As she sees it, the pieces of the bill that would roll back net metering and allow utilities to unfairly compete on rooftop solar dimensions of the bill are “a huge distraction from the conversation Ohio wants to have” on its energy future.


The Ohio Environmental Council is a member of RE-AMP, which publishes Midwest Energy News.

Residents Launch Round One of Columbus (IN) Community Solar Initiative

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 23, 2016  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Columbus Community Solar Initiative

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 22, 2016

 

Contact: Michael A. Mullett

(812) 376-0734

MullettGEN@aol.com

 

Columbus Residents Launch Round One of Columbus Community Solar Initiative to Go Solar Together, Get a Discount with Third Sun Solar

 

Columbus, IN – A group of homeowners in Columbus and Bartholomew County has launched the first round of the planned Columbus Community Solar Initiative to solarize eight homes in the community using the best equipment, practices and prices available from the most qualified vendor responding to the Initiative’s Request for Proposals.  

The Initiative has selected Third Sun Solar to install solar panels for its first group of participants following a competitive bidding process involving ten firms. The group will hold a public information meeting on Wednesday, June 8 at 7:00 to 8:30 PM at the Columbus Area Visitors Center to further inform the community about “going solar” generally, the Round One process specifically, and future plans for a subsequent second round of the Initiative.

“It is an honor to be selected by the Columbus Community Solar Initiative because we know how meticulously they reviewed each bid,” said Geoff Greenfield, President, Third Sun Solar. “We are thrilled to help more people go solar by providing quality arrays that will accelerate the shift to clean energy.”

The Columbus Community Solar Initiative is a volunteer group jointly sponsored by the Energy Matters Community Coalition and the Winding Waters Group of the Sierra Club focused on identifying and assisting interested residents, businesses, community organizations, and governmental entities to “go solar together” so as to maximize the benefits and minimize the costs for all involved.

Community members involved in the Initiative’s Round One Request for Proposals selected Third Sun Solar because of its extensive experience, sterling reputation, proven solar technology and installation practices, solid warranties, attractive pricing, and sufficient scale of operation to partner with the Initiative to achieve its goal of 1,000 solar panels installed in Bartholomew County by the end of 2016 or soon thereafter.

“I am excited to work with an outstanding installer like Third Sun Solar and see how much I can save with my system by being part of a larger group,” said Initiative Steering Committee member and Round One participant Barry Kastner. “I also appreciate having the support of other interested and knowledgeable members of the community as I go through this process individually.  We are all in this together doing the best we can not only for ourselves but for everyone involved, in true Columbus community spirit.”

The Initiative will be open to new members until September 1. City of Columbus and Bartholomew County homeowners, business owners, nonprofit organizations and governmental entities interested in joining the solarize program can locate sign-up forms at:

http://energymatterscolumbus.org/2016/02/01/solar-initiative-documentation/

Third Sun Solar will provide each Initiative participant with an individualized proposal based on the group rate. By going solar as a group and choosing a single installer, each participant generally saves up to 20% off the cost of their system.


 

Information session details

Wednesday, June 8

7:00 to 8:30 PM

Columbus Area Visitors Center- Barbara Stewart Conference Room

506 5th Street, Columbus, Indiana 47201

 

 


 

 

About Columbus Community Solar Initiative:

The Columbus Community Solar Initiative is a joint project of the Sierra Club Winding Waters Group and the Energy Matters Community Coalition. Affinity groups in the Columbus area, including faith communities and neighborhood centers, are gathering together to address the preservation of our environment through more sustainable use of our limited energy resources by making solar energy a viable option for more households and organizations in our community.

The goal of the proposed Initiative is to install 1000 solar panels within Bartholomew County by December 31, 2016. This goal is based on the demographics of the County as well as the experience of other communities in “going solar” following what is known as the Solarize Model.

 

 

About Third Sun Solar:

Third Sun Solar is a full service clean energy company serving homeowners, businesses, institutions and government entities across the Midwest. We are a licensed electrical and general contractor that has installed more than 600 projects and 10,000 kWs of solar energy systems in 12 states since our start in 2000.  We are a woman-owned, certified B-Corporation with the mission to accelerate the shift to clean energy. Our team of solar consultants, designers, financing experts and NABCEP-certified installers work to make solar easy as we deliver high performance and long lasting solar solutions using our optimized design process.

 

Future of Illinois energy bill still uncertain

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 20, 2016  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Illinois Senator Hunter_573e66bddbb40.image

Democratic Sen. Mattie Hunter of Chicago, chairwoman of the Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee

Illinois Senator Rose_57351b2098882.image

Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet

Future of Exelon-backed energy bill remains unclear

by Dan Petrella,  The Southern, Springfield Bureau

SPRINGFIELD -- It remains unclear whether the Illinois General Assembly will act before the scheduled end of its spring session on legislation that Exelon Corp. says is essential to the future of its financially struggling nuclear power plants in Clinton and near the Quad Cities.

Near the end of a committee hearing Thursday that lasted more than three hours, Democratic Sen. Mattie Hunter of Chicago, chairwoman of the Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee won’t be coming to the Senate floor for a vote anytime soon.

Exelon has said that it will shut down the Clinton Power Station next year “if adequate legislation is not passed that properly values nuclear power for its economic, environmental and reliability benefits during the spring Illinois legislative session scheduled to end May 31.”

Among many other changes, Exelon’s “Next Generation Power Plan” would extend state subsidies similar to those granted to the wind and solar energy industries to nuclear power, which the company says is warranted because, like those power sources, nuclear doesn’t generate carbon emissions.

But Hunter said there are still ongoing discussions among the company, environmental and consumer groups, and other interested parties that must continue before the legislation is ready for a vote.

“It appears our committee is split,” Hunter said. “I don’t know if we even have enough votes to get it passed anyway.”

While acknowledging that there’s no way to please everyone completely, she said there are signs that negotiations are moving in a positive direction.

Indeed, organizations that often oppose legislative proposals from Exelon and other utilities expressed partial support for the current proposal during Thursday’s hearing or said they’re engaged in discussions with Exleon.

David Kolata, executive director of the Citizens Utility Board, a consumer watchdog, said the current proposal “is significantly better than what you’ve seen before from (Commonwealth Edison) and Exelon, ComEd’s corporate parent.

The organization has estimated that 60 percent of ComEd customers would see savings under new rate structures the bill would introduce, Kolata said.

He said one issue that remains is fixing problems with the state’s renewable portfolio standard, which currently calls for 25 percent of Illinois’ energy to come from renewable sources by 2025

Jack Darin, director of the Illinois chapter of the Sierra Club, said his group likewise is at the table with Exleon.

 The Sierra Club wants a comprehensive energy policy that builds on earlier energy conservation efforts, encourages renewable energy development and reduces carbon pollution, Darin said.

“We are working through those issues,” he said. “We have made some important progress.”

But Exelon’s proposal also faces stiff opposition from groups like AARP Illinois, the Illinois Public Interest Research Group and the Illinois attorney general’s office.

Many of their concerns center on the impact the legislation would have on utility customers.

“We think this is a terrible proposal,” said Abe Scarr, director of the Illinois Public Interest Research Group.

Of particular concern to these groups is a proposal to shift from charging customers for energy distribution by the kilowatt-hour to imposing a “demand charge,” which would be assessed based on each customer’s peak usage during the month. Opponents say this could result in wide month-to-month variations in power bills.

“It’s designed to ensure profits and more consistent profits for ComEd and Exelon and not the public policy goals that our state should be pursuing,” Scarr said.

For many in Clinton and the Quad Cities, the issue comes down to jobs and local property tax revenue.

Clinton City Administrator Tim Followell testified that the plant accounts for half of the city’s property tax collections.

Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, who represents the plant, issued a statement during the hearing noting that it also provides $7.6 million in tax revenue to the Clinton School District and $1 million to Richland Community College in Decatur.

The plant also provides nearly 2,000 direct and indirect jobs, Followell said.

Sen. Donne Trotter, D-Chicago, the bill’s sponsor, said it is a work in progress and discussions will continue.

Michigan Conservative Energy Forum Ward: “Create Michigan-first energy plan”

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 19, 2016  /   Posted in Uncategorized  /   No Comments

Ward, Larry

Ward: Lansing could lead state’s energy future


Last September, in the wake of the EPA’s release of the Clean Power Plan, Gov. Snyder announced that, rather than a plan written by bureaucrats from Washington, D.C., Michigan would take charge of our energy future by developing our own Michigan-first plan.

Now, with the retirement of Consumers Energy’s “Classic 7” coal power plants – and more closures of aging DTE plants to come – it is time to put that plan in motion.

Legislative hearings will begin this week in the Senate energy and technology committee, offering conservatives and Republicans a real opportunity to continue our transition to a true “all of the above” energy mix that makes energy efficiency and use of clean, renewable energy top priorities.

Creation of a Michigan-first energy plan allows us to take ownership of our energy future. Proper planning allows the Governor and the legislature an opportunity to save money for Michigan families and businesses by reducing rates – which is important.

Because, as Dr. Gary Wolfram (Hillsdale College’s director of economics) authored in “Improving Michigan’s Electricity Utility Industry, even though our electricity rates are among the highest in the Midwest, our system remains less reliable and more polluting than our neighboring states.

As Michiganders, we are united by the fact that we all use electricity – for businesses and residents alike, we can and must do better.

With a forward-looking, Michigan-first energy plan, we can capitalize on homegrown renewable energy and energy efficiency technology to help further spur Michigan’s economy, create good-paying jobs, protect our environment and give relief to ratepayers.

Investing in more renewable energy and energy efficiency is an investment in Michigan’s economy and workforce. The recently-released “Clean Jobs Midwest” report found Michigan ranked second in the region for the highest percentage of clean energy jobs, and ranks first in clean vehicle jobs. Over 87,000 Michiganders are today employed in the clean energy and energy efficiency industries.

Leveraging our innovative talent and our robust manufacturing sector, we have emerged as a clean energy economic leader in the Midwest, giving true meaning to the Governor’s phrase “Comeback State.” We are now poised to become a national leader.

Michigan’s clean energy industry only has room to grow. Now our energy future depends on sound policy enacted by the state legislature. Bills addressing the state’s renewable energy and energy efficiency standards are being considered in the legislature – and we have a true opportunity to strengthen our economy and protect ratepayers by increasing our use of renewable energy and energy efficiency.

The Flint water crisis has demonstrated our lack of investment in Michigan communities’ infrastructure, and our energy infrastructure is also in dire need of modernization. It’s time for the legislature to show leadership, and work with Gov. Snyder on a Michigan-first energy plan that would make investing in our renewable energy and energy efficiency sectors a top priority.

Michigan is poised and ready to tap the state’s unrivaled innovative talent and manufacturing expertise to fuel the nation’s clean energy economy. Now is the time for Republicans in Michigan to take ownership of our energy future, and help the state move boldly and decisively forward.

Larry Ward is the executive director of the Michigan Conservative Energy Forum.

For more information on the Michigan Conservative Energy Forum, visit http://www.micef.org/.


Download Dr. Gary Wolfram's (Hillsdale College’s director of economics) white paper entitled “Improving Michigan’s Electricity Utility Industry" Sept. 17, 2015.

Improving Michigan's Electric Utility Industry_2015_Wolfram+White+Paper.compressed


 

 

New NC Poll Shows Strong Bi-Partisan Voter Support for Clean Energy

Posted by Laura Arnold  /   May 19, 2016  /   Posted in solar, Uncategorized  /   No Comments

 

CCE logo

NEW POLL FINDS STRONG BI-PARTISAN VOTER SUPPORT FOR CLEAN ENERGY POLICIES & ENERGY SOURCES

NC voters will support leaders who pass stronger clean energy policies & deliver more options

RALEIGH, NC – Conservatives For Clean Energy (CCE), in a poll conducted by Strategic Partners Solutions, today released its findings regarding statewide voter opinions on current energy issues facing North Carolina. The poll revealed widespread support for renewable energy and energy efficiency across all partisan and ideological lines, with voters saying they would vote for legislators and elected officials who are working to expand these energy innovations and economic opportunities. The results were discussed during a poll briefing luncheon in Raleigh on Tuesday, which featured Mark Fleming, President and CEO of Conservatives for Clean Energy, and two of North Carolina’s top Republican campaign consultants – Paul Shumaker, President of Capitol Communications, and Dee Stewart, President and CEO of The Stewart Group – with a broad audience of state legislators, community leaders, energy industry executives, North Carolina citizens, and the media.

The poll was conducted on April 18-19, 2016, of 800 registered voters who were randomly selected with predetermined voter participation in past elections (margin of error: ± 3.46%).Click here to view the complete poll results and click here to view Paul Shumaker’s presentation given at the poll briefing.

“North Carolinians, whether Republican, Democrat or Unaffiliated voters, are overwhelmingly in support of increasing the use of clean energy in our state,” said Mark Fleming, President and CEO of Conservatives for Clean Energy. “Clean energy is creating thousands of new jobs, expanding business opportunities, and giving us more stable, affordable electric bills. These poll results are an important metric and guide for elected officials and candidates running for office regarding voters’ opinions about energy policy and resources in North Carolina.”

The polling results revealed widespread support for renewable energy options across all partisan and ideological lines, including the state’s Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS) law and other policies that would expand access to clean energy for electricity customers.

Of particular note, 86.5% of voters said they want elected officials to encourage renewable energy options such as solar and wind and 87.6% said providing additional options for home and business owners to finance energy efficiency upgrades such as improved insulation, lighting or windows. And, only 27% of respondents said they were satisfied with our state’s current monopoly-controlled electricity market, whereas 67.1% want more options when it comes to their utility and energy choices.

In 2007, North Carolina became the first state in the Southeast and the 25th in the nation to adopt a Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS) law, which requires utilities to incrementally increase their use of renewable energy resources and energy efficiency programs to 12.5% of their energy mix by 2021. According to the poll, 74.8% of voters support the REPS law, 21.1% oppose, and 4.1% did not have an opinion. (Of the voters who said they support the REPS law, 64.7% are registered Republican, 84.0% Democrat, and 72.7% Unaffiliated.) This is a slight increase from CCE’s 2015 poll results, which found 69% supported the REPS law. Furthermore, North Carolina’s legislators have shown their on-going support of the REPS policy by blocking several attempts to repeal it in 2013 and 2015.

The poll also asked several questions regarding North Carolina’s renewable energy investment tax credit, which legislators allowed to expire at the end of 2015, despite extensive debate and bi-partisan support. According to the poll results, 72.1% of voters support the NC General Assembly re-establishing this tax credit for home and business owners installing renewable energy projects; among these supporters, 64.3% are registered Republicans, 69.7% Unaffiliated, and 80.5% Democrat. And, among geographical locations for voters who said they want legislators to re-start the tax credit, 81.1% live in urban areas, 73.6% in suburban areas, and 67.5% in rural areas. Those opposed to the tax credit were 20.1% and 7.8% did not have an opinion.

Other key findings from the poll include:

  • When asked what lawmakers should prioritize when developing new energy policies, voters overwhelmingly said investing in new clean energy sources like solar and wind at 53.6% and 18.6% said allowing for more competition with existing utility companies, which compared to 10.9% who wanted increased oil and natural gas exploration, 5.9% for low cost energy sources regardless of environmental impact, and 5.8% for continued support for coal fired power plants.
  • 72% support policies allowing for third-party energy sales, which would let companies other than a utility to sell power directly to a customer; third-party energy sales is currently illegal in North Carolina and at least seven other states. 69% of voters said they would support a legislator who supported third-party energy sales, which increased even higher to 75.6% support among registered male Unaffiliated voters and 81.8% among all male voters 40 years old and under.

“Support for clean energy can be a winning message for our state’s leaders regardless of political party affiliation. North Carolina is becoming a leader in these new clean energy technologies, voters are noticing and are expressing strong support for it, and they are clearly asking for more,” said Paul Shumaker, a leading political strategist and President of Capitol Communications.

The poll asked voters for their opinions as state leaders are debating policies that would impact current and future energy sources. “When it comes to your opinion about state leaders, would you support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate who supports the following energy resources?”:

Energy Source Support Candidate Oppose Candidate Don’t Know/Refused
Offshore drilling for oil or gas 47.8% 42.3% 10.0%
New nuclear energy 42.1% 47.5% 10.4%
Renewable energy options such as solar & wind 86.5% 10.6% 2.9%
Addtl ways to finance energy efficiency upgrades 87.6% 8.9% 3.5%
Drilling of natural gas also known as hydro-fracking 29.8% 52.6% 17.6%

Legislative leaders have said they do not expect to pass major energy-related legislation during the 2016 “short session” of the NC General Assembly, which began last week in Raleigh; however, 2017 could present new opportunities for in-depth debate and discussions as the state marks a decade since the REPS law was enacted.

“These poll results clearly demonstrate overwhelming conservative support for clean energy policies in North Carolina,” said Dee Stewart of The Stewart Group. “Somewhat surprising, only 27% of respondents said they were satisfied with our state’s current monopoly-controlled electricity market, which presents opportunities for legislators to update our energy policies in 2017. Voters in this poll have clearly expressed their desire for more clean energy options and now legislators have an opportunity to work together and deliver.”

The poll also included a question regarding the upcoming election for Governor, which found 43.6% would vote for Pat McCrory, 40.6% for Roy Cooper, 3.0% for Lon Cecil (Libertarian), and 12.8% were undecided.

About Conservatives for Clean Energy

Conservatives for Clean Energy educates the public about the benefits of clean and renewable energy sources in North Carolina. The organization helps to lead the conversation about the economic benefits of clean energy within North Carolina’s economy.  As conservatives, the organization encourages competition and free markets, which allows for vibrant, sustainable economies.  Clean and renewable energy sources represent the future of energy in North Carolina. Additional information about Conservatives for Clean Energy can be found at: www.cleanenergyconservatives.com

# # #

Copyright 2013 IndianaDG